首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

环境侵权民事诉讼举证责任分配之比较研究
引用本文:张睿. 环境侵权民事诉讼举证责任分配之比较研究[J]. 河北法学, 2009, 27(3)
作者姓名:张睿
作者单位:河南省政法管理干部学院,民商法系,河南,郑州,450002
摘    要:在环境侵权民事诉讼中,举证责任分配的合理与否关系到环境法目的的实现和环境诉讼程序价值的发挥.但传统举证责任分配理论对环境诉讼而言具有不适应性.因此,两大法系对环境诉讼都发展了举证责任分配理论.通过比较考察发现,环境诉讼的举证责任分配应当按照公平正义原则,结合环境诉讼的特点,从举证难易程度、环境立法宗旨、平等保护和环境侵权纠纷的多样性等因素来综合衡量.相比之下,我国环境案件举证责任分配的慕本规则还存在诸多缺陷,因此应规定较为开放的举证责任分配制度原则.

关 键 词:环境侵权民事诉讼  举证责任分配  比较研究

A Comparative Study of Evidential Burden Distribution in Civil Actions of Environment Torts
ZHANG Rui. A Comparative Study of Evidential Burden Distribution in Civil Actions of Environment Torts[J]. Hebei Law Science, 2009, 27(3)
Authors:ZHANG Rui
Affiliation:Department of Civil and Commercial Law;Henan Administrative Institute of Politics and Law;Zhengzhou 450002 China
Abstract:In the civil action of environment tort,to properly distribute evidential burden will affect the realization of the aim of environmental law and the exertion of the value of environment action procedure.However,the traditional theory of evidential burden distribution does not apply to environment action.Thus,the two genealogies of law developed that theory.By comparative studies,it is found that civil action as to the distribution of evidential burden should be balanced comprehensively in accordance with eq...
Keywords:civil action of environment tort  evidential burden distribution  comparative study  
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号