首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

试论相对不起诉及其不当性
引用本文:姚任,黄固锋.试论相对不起诉及其不当性[J].政法学刊,2005,22(1):83-85.
作者姓名:姚任  黄固锋
作者单位:1. 拿摩拉公司,广州代表处,广东,广州,510000
2. 海珠区人民检察院,广东,广州,510000
摘    要:随着相对不起诉制度于1996年在我国的确立,免予起诉制度在运行了十七年之后终被废止。该制度旨在追求司法效率,但却以牺牲司法公正为代价,不仅表现在对被害人与被不起诉人之间的保护失衡,而且存在着损害二者合法权益的隐患,甚至对检察机关与审判机关的公信力也产生了不同程度的减损。鉴于此,该制度的完善或存废问题值得我们进行深刻反思。

关 键 词:相对不起诉  法律效果  不当性  公正  效率
文章编号:1009-3745(2005)01-0083-03
修稿时间:2004年11月12

On Relative Nol Pros System and Its In Properness
Yao Ren,Huang Gu-feng.On Relative Nol Pros System and Its In Properness[J].Journal of Political Science and Law,2005,22(1):83-85.
Authors:Yao Ren  Huang Gu-feng
Abstract:With the establishment of relative nol pros system in china in 1996, immunity from prosecution system which was adopted seventeen years ago was abolished. The purpose of the adoption of relative nol pros system is to increase efficiency while at the cost of judicial justice. The system not only reflects the imbalance of protection between the victim and person who is spared from prosecution but also possibly damages the legal rights of the two parties. What' s more, it will also damage the public conviction to prosecutorial organization and trial organization . Due to the reasons mentioned, the issues concerning the perfection or abolishment of the system should be reconsidered.
Keywords:relative nol pros system  legal effect  incorrectness  justice  efficiency  
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号