Popular perceptions of political regimes in East and Southeast Asia |
| |
Authors: | Matthew Carlson Mark Turner |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Department of Political Science , University of Vermont , 509 Old Mill, 94 University Place, Burlington , VT , 05405-0114 , USA matthew.carlson@uvm.edu;3. Faculty of Business and Government , University of Canberra , Australia |
| |
Abstract: | Political regimes in East and Southeast Asia run the full spectrum from liberal democracy through various hybrid democratic-authoritarian types and on to full-blown authoritarianism and totalitarianism. While political scientists have invested much effort and ingenuity in creating typologies of regimes to better understand the empirical diversity of political structures and processes, much less attention has been paid to what the citizens think. How do people in East and Southeast Asian countries perceive their own institutions and performance of governance? This article uses public opinion data derived from the AsiaBarometer 2006 and 2007 Surveys of 12 East and Southeast Asian countries to map what citizens actually think about their structures, processes, and outcomes of governance and compare these with the regime classifications of political scientists. The results revealed universal commitment to elections but disillusionment with political practice, positive estimations of the institutions of governance in Southeast Asia but much less enthusiasm in East Asia, and a preference for moderate opinions. There is no clear overall correlation between regime type and popular perception. |
| |
Keywords: | East and Southeast Asia democracy authoritarianism totalitarianism political structures political processes AsiaBarometer citizens elections regime |
|
|