| 关于商标的显著性问题 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 潘勇锋. 关于商标的显著性问题[J]. 山东警察学院学报, 2001, 13(6): 30-33 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 潘勇锋 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 北京大学法学院,北京,100871 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 商标必须具有显著性,但一个不具有显著性的标记在长期使用后会形成"第二含义"而获得显著性.我国司法实践中存在此种情况,现行商标法的规定却从法律上堵塞了这种实现合法化的可能性.本文建议对有关条文进行修改,以符合市场经济发展的要求.
|
| 关 键 词： | 商标 显著性 第二含义 禁用标记 |
| 文章编号： | 1008-5246(2001)06-0030-04 |
| 修稿时间： | 2001-09-27 |
About the Distinctiveness of Trademarks |
| |
| PAN Yong-feng. About the Distinctiveness of Trademarks[J]. Journal of Shandong Police College, 2001, 13(6): 30-33 |
| |
| Authors: | PAN Yong-feng |
| |
| Abstract: | It is necessary that a trademark should have distinctiveness. Having been used for a long time, a indistinctive symbol will gain "secondary meaning" and become distinctive. It has been recognized in our judicial practice but the trademark law in effect make it impossible to legitimize this kind of judicial practice. The author puts forward her own legislative proposals. |
| |
| Keywords: | trademark distinctiveness secondary meaning forbidden symbol |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
