"侵权"概念辨析及我国的立法选择

"侵权"这一基本概念的界定是我国民法典编纂所不能回避的问题.然而,"侵权"一词在大陆法系、英美法系和我国有着不同的含义大陆法系都将侵权行为作为债的发生根据,与损害赔偿紧密联系在一起;英美法系有两个概念与"侵权"相对应一个是Tort,一个是Infringement,两者含义各不相同;而在我国,侵权则是与包括损害赔偿在内的民事责任相联系的.我国民法典如何界定"侵权"概念亟须理论上的研究.我国民法典编纂中应当采用将停止侵害等作为侵权行为的效果的"侵权"概念,而不应像大陆法系那样仅将"侵权"的责任形式限于损害赔偿.

The Definition of Torts and Suggestion for Legal Choice In China

How to make correct definition for torts, the basic word in civil law, cannot be avoided in the way to make civil law. However the word has different legal definitions in Civil Law countries, Common Law countries and our country China. Tort causes the debts in Civil Law System, and has close relationship with damage indemnity. Whereas in Common Law system, counterparts are two different words, Tort and Infringement, with different conditions. In our country this word is usually referred to civil liabilities including damage indemnity. We should refer Torts to a series of outcomes including stopping damages, rather than refine the liability forms within indemnity.