| 监听措施的法律规制 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 石浩旭.监听措施的法律规制[J].新疆警官高等专科学校学报,2008,28(4):19-21. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 石浩旭 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 江西九江学院法学系,江西,九江,332005 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 监听措施的采用是各国在面对日益复杂的犯罪形势的一种必然的有效的选择,但监听措施是以侵犯公民基本权利为代价.因而,监听措施的适用必须进行利益衡量与价值选择,遵循比例原则,进行法律规制.我国刑事程序立法应明确规定监听应遵循必要性原则、监听的适用范围、适用主体及监听措施的核准权主体.应当建立对被监听者的权利救济机制.
|
| 关 键 词： | 监听 冲突与选择 利益衡量与价值选择 法律规制 |
Legal Regulations on Wiretap |
| |
| SHI Hao-xun.Legal Regulations on Wiretap[J].Journal of Xinj iang Police Officers’Academy,2008,28(4):19-21. |
| |
| Authors: | SHI Hao-xun |
| |
| Institution: | SHI Hao-xun(Law Dep.,Jiujiang College,Jiujiang,Jiangxi 332005,China) |
| |
| Abstract: | The application of wiretap is a kind of inevitable valid choice that all countries adopt,facing increasing complicated criminal situation.But using wiretap is at price of infringing the citizens' basic right.As a result,the application of wiretap has to weight the benefits and values,follow a comparison principle and carry on law rules and regulations.The procedure lawmaking of criminal law should definitely prescribe the necessity principle and application range of wiretap.The department of authorizing wir... |
| |
| Keywords: | conflict and choice benefits weight and values choice laws and regulations |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
