首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

中西司法权的比较
引用本文:邢晓晖.中西司法权的比较[J].甘肃政法学院学报,2004(3):30-34.
作者姓名:邢晓晖
作者单位:天津商学院法学系,天津,300134
摘    要:司法权虽然是近现代社会的许多国家都相继接受的政治话语之一 ,但是 ,它在各国的含义并不完全相同。本文对中国和西方主要国家的司法权 ,在裁判权、救济权、法律解释权和审查权四个方面的内容差异进行了比较 ,因为分析并认识这些差异 ,既有利于避免概念的混淆与误用 ,也有可能进一步明确我国司法改革的方向 ,司法权司法改革的重中之重。

关 键 词:司法权  裁判权  救济权  审查权

Compare between Chinese Judicial Power and Western Countries' Judicial Power
Xing Xiaohui.Compare between Chinese Judicial Power and Western Countries' Judicial Power[J].Journal of Gansu Political Science and Law Institute,2004(3):30-34.
Authors:Xing Xiaohui
Abstract:Although judicial power is an accepted political expression by one country after another in modern society,it represents some differences in different countries. This article compares Chinese judicial power with west chief countries' judicial power form four aspects such as arbitrary power,relief power,law explanation power,checkup power. Analyzing and knowing these differences not only is favorable to avoiding confusion and misuse of concepts,but also to defining clearly the direction of the judicial reform in our country. Judicial power is the most important content of the judicial reform after all.
Keywords:judicial power  arbitrary power  relief power  checkup power  
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号