| 违约责任精神损害赔偿之通说辩驳与适用设计 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 黄金桥. 违约责任精神损害赔偿之通说辩驳与适用设计[J]. 广东行政学院学报, 2007, 19(3): 38-42,46 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 黄金桥 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 湖北行政学院,政法系,湖北,武汉,430022 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 关于违约责任精神损害赔偿的理论通说的辩驳可以揭示,违约责任精神损害不适用赔偿的种种理由难以令人信服,不足以构成否定赔偿的法理依据。因此,立法上可以确立违约责任适用精神损害赔偿的制度。同时,为了克服理论障碍,将可能产生的负作用降到最低,需要进行严格而审慎的适用该赔偿的制度设计。
|
| 关 键 词： | 违约责任精神损害赔偿 通说辩驳 适用设计 |
| 文章编号： | 1008-4533(2007)03-0038-05 |
| 修稿时间： | 2007-02-26 |
Arguments against No Compensation for Default Spiritual Damage and Its Application Design |
| |
| HUANG Jin-qiao. Arguments against No Compensation for Default Spiritual Damage and Its Application Design[J]. Journal of Guangdong Institute of Public Administration, 2007, 19(3): 38-42,46 |
| |
| Authors: | HUANG Jin-qiao |
| |
| Abstract: | The discourse that refutes the prevalent remarks against compensation for default spiritual damage indicates all arguments against compensation for default spiritual damage don't hold water,and then can't be the legal arguments for no compensation.So legislation should establish the system of compensation for default spiritual damage.For overcoming the theoretic obstacle and at the same time reducing the side-effect at lowest,it is necessary to design with strictness and circumspection a set of system that is proper to this sort of compensation. |
| |
| Keywords: | compensation for default spiritual damage refutation about common remarks application design |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
