使用假币罪比较研究

对于使用假币的行为 ,各国刑法大多规定为犯罪。对于本罪的构成要件 ,中外刑法除对主体要件认识一致外 ,对于该罪其他要件的规定 ,则存在着一定差异。在侵害法益上 ,外国刑法普遍认为是公共信用 ,笔者认为是国家对货币的流通管理制度。在犯罪对象上 ,外国认为是伪造、变造的硬币、纸币或银行券 ,我国认为是伪造的货币 ,不包括变造的货币。在客观要件上 ,中外刑法均认为是将假币冒充真币投入流通领域 ,但我国还有数额较大的程度要求。在主观要件上 ,中外刑法均认为是出于故意 ,笔者认为还须具有“使用”之目的。

Comparative Research on the Use of Counterfeit Note

The use of counterfeit note was viewed as criminal behavior in the most countries' criminal law. Except for the agreement on the subject essentials, there exist some differences of the other essentials between the criminal laws home and abroad. As for the infringement of object, the foreign criminal laws prefer to public credit while currency circulation management system is our opinion. For criminal target, foreign criminal law is for counterfeit coin, paper currency and bank bonds .As far as objective essentials are concerned , both view it as the behavior of putting the counterfeit note into the realm of currency circulation.However, in our country large amount is emphasized. Intentional act is the subjective essentials held by criminal laws . The author still points out the intention of "use" for this problem.