《上海》——“保守”还是“前卫”? |
| |
引用本文: | 奚皓晖.《上海》——“保守”还是“前卫”?[J].日本问题研究,2016(5):54-63. |
| |
作者姓名: | 奚皓晖 |
| |
作者单位: | 华东师范大学 中文系,上海,210000 |
| |
摘 要: | 横光利一1928年上海的跨界旅行,是透过经济资本在上海造成的地区性断裂来表达全球资本一元主义与平民主义知识分子"淳朴的自活"之间的紧张。作为革命理想主义的"芳秋兰"与价值虚无主义的"宫子"共同构成参木心态"表里一体"的一个圆。横光透过"参木"这个形象,流露出通过主动的虚无主义来回归日本传统伦理共同体这一激进的民粹主义意图。
|
关 键 词: | 现代性 《上海》 横光利一 |
Shanghai---“conservative”or “avant-garde”? |
| |
Abstract: | In 1928,during Riichi Yokomitsu’s journey in Shanghai,the tension between monism of interna-tional capital and the “pure self-living”of populist intellectuals was reflected through fractures around the district caused by economic capital.Fang Qiu Lan,symbolized for revolutionary idealism,and Gong Zi,re-presented for nihilism,co-construct Can Mu’s externality and internality of his mentality.The figure of Can Mu is a reflection of Riichi Yokomitsu’s radical populism,with an intention to return the community of Japanese traditional ethics through an active nihilism. |
| |
Keywords: | Shanghai Modernity Riichi Yokomitsu |
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录! |
|