| 非法鉴定意见排除规则研究 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 贾治辉,孔令勇. 非法鉴定意见排除规则研究[J]. 铁道警官高等专科学校学报, 2014, 0(4): 18-25 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 贾治辉 孔令勇 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 西南政法大学刑事侦查学院,重庆401120 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 2012年度西南政法大学研究生科研创新计划重点资助项目“新《刑事诉讼法》技术专家出庭质证制度研究”（2012-XZYJS052）阶段性研究成果 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 我国非法鉴定意见排除规则的定义是指在诉讼过程中,由于鉴定的前、中、后程序出现严重违法或瑕疵,使得鉴定意见非法或者不合法,经过法官审查或合法当事人提出,使相应鉴定意见的证据能力或者证明力失效的规则。非法鉴定意见排除规则由鉴定前、中、后三个程序规则构成,对诉讼理念、制度、程序与社会等各个层面均有重要的意义。
|
| 关 键 词： | 非法证据排除 鉴定意见 证据规则 |
A Study of the Exclusionary Rules of Illegal Expert Opinion |
| |
| Jia Zhihui,Kong Lingyong. A Study of the Exclusionary Rules of Illegal Expert Opinion[J]. Journal of Railway Ministry Zhengzhou Police College, 2014, 0(4): 18-25 |
| |
| Authors: | Jia Zhihui Kong Lingyong |
| |
| Affiliation: | (Institute of Criminal Investigation, Southwest University of Political Science and Law, Chongqing 401120, China) |
| |
| Abstract: | The definition of China＇s exclusionary rules of illegal expert opinion is a kind of rule whichmakes competence and probative force of evidence become invalid because of the flaws or serious illegalbehaviors in pre-procedure, interlocutory and follow-up proceeding of judicial authentication practice followingjudge＇s review or competent litigant＇s appeal. Exclusionary rules of illegal expert opinion consist of three rulesof pre-procedure, interlocutory and follow-up proceeding of judicial authentication practice. These rules aremeaningful to concept, system and procedure of litigation as well as the society. |
| |
| Keywords: | exclusionary rules of illegal obtained evidence expert opinion evidence rule |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录！ |
|
