刑法上认识因素的实用主义法理学分析

"天价葡萄案"引起了人们广泛的讨论,但是法律人应当理性地思考一个重要问题:法律是否应当考虑行为人的心智.根据实用主义法理学,可行性、成本和效果是分析这一问题的三个角度,即:由于法律上难以确定一个客观的意志标准,由于法律考虑行为人意志的成本过高,并且由于法律考虑行为人的意志并没有什么好处,所以,法律应当放弃对于行为人意志的考虑,而是采用一个更为客观、更为实用的理性人标准.

Pragmatistic Analysis on the Cognitive Element of Criminal Law

The case of "expensive grapes" drew great attention.However,We should rationally focus on an important question-shall the mind of human being be considered by the law? Pragmatistic Jurisprudence answer this question based on three factors,namely,feasibility,cost and result.That is,the law should adopt a more objective and pragmatistic standard of rational person instead of considering the mind of human being because of the great difficulty,high cost and unfavorable result of the latter.