首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

康德的法权哲学基础
引用本文:叶秀山. 康德的法权哲学基础[J]. 江苏行政学院学报, 2012, 0(1): 5-11
作者姓名:叶秀山
作者单位:中国社会科学院哲学研究所,北京,100732
摘    要:康德的法权哲学思路是和他的三个《批判》所述一致的,“科学知识”要发现“自然(关系)”中的“必然性”,而“法权学”则是要在“人”的“关系”中发现“必然性”,也就是关于“法权”的“先天综合”何以可能的问题.“法权”问题又和《实践理性批判》里所论述的“自由”密切相关.“自由”的“限制”“关系”就《实践理性批判》所涉及的“道德”来说,“根据”在于一个“形式”的“应该”,而就现实的“国家-法律”来说,则是“自由者”之间的“法权”关系.“法权”“本体的所有”既“悬搁”又“范导”“现象的所有”.“自由者”在“人格-格位”“平等”基础上“限制”着各自的自由,由此而形成的“共同体”乃是“自由的共在”.

关 键 词:先天综合判断  自由  法权  限制  平等  自由的共在

Foundation of Kant's Philosophy of Legal Right
YE Xiu-shan. Foundation of Kant's Philosophy of Legal Right[J]. The Journal of Jiangsu Administration Institute, 2012, 0(1): 5-11
Authors:YE Xiu-shan
Affiliation:YE Xiu-shan(Philosophical Institute,Chinese Academy of Social Sciences,Beijing 100732,China)
Abstract:Kant’s philosophy of legal right is consistent with his three books of criticism: "scientific knowledge" should find the "necessity" in "natural(relations)" while "legal right science" is supposed to find the "necessity" in the "relations",i.e.,how congenital comprehensiveness of legal right becomes possible."Legal right" is closely related to the "freedom" in Criticism of Practical Rationality.In terms of the "moral" in Criticism of Practical Rationality,the "limit" of "freedom" is based on a "supposed form" while in terms of actual "country-law",it is the relations of "legal right" between "free people"."Ontological possession" of "legal right" not only "suspends" but "guides" "phenomenal ownership"."Free people" "limit" their freedom on the foundation of "equal character" and therefore,the formed "community" is called "free coexistence".
Keywords:Judgment of Congenital Comprehensiveness  Freedom  Legal Right  Limit  Equality  Free Coexistence
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号