侦查人员出庭作证制度运行效果的考察 ——基于383份判决的分析

庭审实质化改革下,侦查人员出庭作证的重要性日益彰显。考察2012年1月至2019年11月中国裁判文书网收录的383份裁判文书,发现侦查人员出庭率低、出庭作证效果不明显。侦查人员出庭作证运行效果不佳的原因主要有:立法规范的模糊性、检察机关的消极态度、侦查人员出庭作证的意愿低。应采取以下措施完善侦查人员出庭作证制度:界定侦查人员出庭作证的范围、明确侦查人员拒绝出庭作证的诉讼法后果、强化侦查人员出庭作证的保障等。

System Operation Effect of Investigators' Testimony in Court based on Analysis from 383 Judgments

Investigators’ testimony in court has become increasingly important in the essentialism of court trial. It is found that attendance rate of investigators’ testimony in court is low and the effect of testimony is not very good based on a review of 383 adjudication documents included in the China Judgment Documents Network from January 2012 to November2019, which is caused by the ambiguity of legislative norms, the negative attitude of prosecutorial organization, and the low willingness of investigators to testify in court. The scope of investigators’ testimony in court should be defined, the consequences of refusing to testify in court should be clarified in the procedural law, and the guarantee for investigators to testify in court should be strengthened to improve the testimony system.