首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

浅议刑事责任的本质
引用本文:余松龄,李景城.浅议刑事责任的本质[J].湖南公安高等专科学校学报,2007,19(3):79-82.
作者姓名:余松龄  李景城
作者单位:湖南大学法学院,湖南长沙,410006
摘    要:对刑事责任的本质进行阐述的学说,西方刑法理论界主要有道义责任论、社会责任论和规范责任论等三种学说,我国刑法理论界主要有刑事法律关系说、国家与个人之间的利益冲突说、最高层次否定价值判断与最严厉的惩罚性义务统一说、伦理性与社会性的辩证统一说、国家评价与个人负担说等几种。由于学者们研究的方法、角度和立场各不相同,从整体而言,这些学说都有其合理性,但也有其缺陷,刑事责任的本质应是社会危害性。

关 键 词:刑事责任  本质  社会危害性
文章编号:1008-7575(2007)03-0079-04
修稿时间:2007年3月19日

On the Essence of Criminal Responsibility
YU Song-ling,LI Jing-cheng.On the Essence of Criminal Responsibility[J].Journal of Huan Public Security College,2007,19(3):79-82.
Authors:YU Song-ling  LI Jing-cheng
Abstract:As for the Chinese and foreign theories of criminal responsibility,there are such three different theories as the theory of morality and justice responsibility,the theory of social responsibility and the theory of regulation responsibility in western criminal theory.In our country,there are theory of criminal legal relations,theory of benefit conflict between country and individual,theory of united obligation of the highest stratification denying value judgment and the severest punishment,theory of dialectical unification of ethics and society,theory of national appraisal and individual burden.Due to scholars' different methods,angles and standpoints of research,all the theories have their own defects though they have somewhat rationality on the whole.The essence of criminal responsibility is social harmfulness.
Keywords:criminal responsibility  essence  social harmfulness
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号