首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

现代诉讼的法理性透视
引用本文:常怡,黄娟.现代诉讼的法理性透视[J].现代法学,2001(1):33-38.
作者姓名:常怡  黄娟
作者单位:西南政法大学,
摘    要:现代社会的诉讼制度设计根据社会冲突的性质可主要划分为三种类型。即民事诉讼制度、刑事诉讼制度和行政诉讼制度。这三大诉讼在程序设计上有着共通的法理 ,即公正与衡平。文章从程序结构法理以及程序运作法理这两个方面对此进行了论述。随后 ,本文通过对诉讼中引入“合意机制”的思考 ,对现代诉讼的价值导向进行了反思 ,指出弘扬个体自治的深远意义。

关 键 词:否定之否定  公正  衡平  合意机制
文章编号:1001-2397(2001)01-0033-06
修稿时间:2000年10月2日

A Thorough Jurisprudential Exploration Into Modern Litigation
Chang Yi,HUANG Juan.A Thorough Jurisprudential Exploration Into Modern Litigation[J].Modern Law Science,2001(1):33-38.
Authors:Chang Yi  HUANG Juan
Abstract:Viewed from the emergence and development of litigation, which is a typical form of the public relieves in a society, the history of human civilization has experienced a process of "the negation to negation", that is, the negation to the ignorant and barbarous dispute-resolving manner when public relief replaced private relief and the negation to judge's arbitration and centralizing of power when the "adversary system" replaced the "inquisitorial system". According to the nature of the social conflicts, the design for the litigation system of modern society can be mainly divided into three types: civil procedural system, criminal procedural system and administrative procedural system which have the common principle of law-impartiality and equity which are expounded in this essay from two aspects: the structure of procedure and the operating of procedure. Lastly, a review is made on value-orientation of the modern litigation through pondering over the leading of "agreement mechanism" into litigation, and points out the significance of advocating individual autonomy.
Keywords:negation to negation  impartiality  equity  agreement mechanism  
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号