学习贯彻十七届六中全会精神推动司法行政文化大发展大繁荣

党的十七届六中全会从全面建设小康社会、推进中国特色社会主义事业、实现中华民族伟大复兴的战略高度,对深化文化体制改革,推动社会主义文化大发展大繁荣作出了全面部署,充分反映了我们党对当今时代发展趋势和我国文化发展方位的科学把握,体现了我们党在新的历史条件下的高度文化自觉和文化自信。司法行政文化是社会主义先进文化在司法行政领域的具体体现,凝聚着司法行政发展历程中积累沉淀的宝贵精神财富,更是在新的起点上推进司法行政事业全面发展的重要力量。我们必须按照十七大提出的“更加自觉、更加主动”的要求,认真学习贯彻十七届六中全会精神,全力推动司法行政文化大发展大繁荣。     

大力繁荣社会主义司法行政文化

司法行政文化作为社会主义先进文化的重要组成部分，是司法行政系统文明成果的集中体现。按照党的十七大关于“兴起社会主义文化建设新高潮”的部署，大力繁荣社会主义司法行政文化，推进司法行政事业科学发展，已经成为摆在我们面前的历史性课题和刻不容缓的任务。     

关于加强司法鉴定文化建设的几点思考

党的十七届六中全会确立了建设社会主义文化强国的战略目标。山东省省委九届十三次全会指出,深入贯彻落实十七届六中全会精神,必须坚持中国特色社会主义文化发展道路,加快文化强省建设。厅党委要求加强司法行政文化建     

不断完善中国特色社会主义司法行政制度

司法行政制度是一个国家政治制度和司法制度的重要组成部分。我国司法行政制度是中国特色社会主义司法制度的重要组成部分，不断完善中国特色社会主义司法行政制度，是新时期司法行政领域的重大理论和实际问题。本刊本期全文刊发了司法部郝赤勇副部长的文章《我国司法行政制度及其改革发展》，文章系统回顾了新中国司法行政制度建立的过程，概述了我国司法行政制度的职能和特点、地位和作用，介绍了司法行政体制机制改革的进展情况，并对完善中国特色社会主义司法行政制度作了前瞻性的思考。     

新形势下加强司法行政法制工作之思考

党的十八大报告提出,全面推进依法治国,法治是治国理政的基本方式。这是对中国特色社会主义法治理论的完善和发展,同时,对司法行政工作提出了新的更高的要求。司法行政法制工作既是司法行政工作的重要组成部分,又是司法行政工作的重要保障,是一项基础性、综合性、全局性的工作,在推动司法行政事业发展、制度完善中具有重要的地位和作用。司法行政事业要科学发展,各项工作要逐步走上制度化、规范化和法制化轨道,必须进一步加强司法行政法制工作。     

江苏省司法厅出台实施意见 推进司法行政法治文化建设

日前，江苏省司法厅制定下发《关于全省司法行政系统大力推进社会主义法治文化建设的实施意见》，要求全系统充分运用社会主义法治文化强化价值观念、打牢思想基础、激发队伍活力、宣传自身工作、树立良好形象，为推动司法行政事业创新发展，在新的起点上争当全国司法行政系统排头兵提供坚强思想保证、强大精神动力、有力舆论支持、良好文化条件。     

浅谈加强社会主义文化建设的重要意义

我国正处于社会主义初级阶段,建设中国特色社会主义是全国各族人民的共同理想。而社会主义文化建设作为中国特色社会主义事业总体布局的重要组成部分,加强社会主义文化建设就是发展社会主义先进文化,它的发展状况对中国特色社会主义的伟大实践起着不可忽视的作用。     

坚持创新为本 推进法院文化建设

文化建设是中国特色社会主义事业总体布局的重要组成部分。党的十七届六中全会以推进文化改革发展为主题,标志着我国已经作出了建设社会主义文化强国的战略部署。而法院文化作为长期司法实践的产物,也是社会主义文化建设中不可或缺的一部分。最高人民法院王胜俊院长指出:"法院文化建设是全社会的大事,更是人民司     

中国传统行政文化发展简论

中国传统行政文化属于统治型行政文化发展阶段。传统行政文化在历史上虽然发挥了积极的作用,但从根本上已不适应现代行政发展的要求。当代中国行政文化处于传统行政文化向现代行政文化转换的阶段,其发展方向是面向中国特色社会主义现代化的新型行政文化。     

求真务实 开拓创新

《中国司法》多年来立足司法行政、面向法治建设,贴近基层、内容翔实,是交流工作经验、展示司法行政风采、传播法治文明的重要阵地,在指导司法行政业务工作中发挥了十分重要的作用。愿《中国司法》改版后,继续保持自已的办刊特色,不断丰富栏目内容,百尺竿头,更进一步!全面建设小康社会宏伟蓝图的实施和社会主义市场经济体制的逐步完善,为司法行政事业改革发展     

Socially Appraising Justice: A Cross-Cultural Perspective

The impact and effectiveness of organizational justice efforts vary across cultures. Previous justice research has focused on such themes as outcome allocation, process criteria, allocation control, and decision justification largely from a Western point of view. This paper analyzes organizational justice perceptions from a cross-cultural perspective. More specifically, using the Hofstede cultural dimensions (individualism/collectivism, uncertainty avoidance, masculinity/femininity, and power distance), key justice areas are examined. Further, predictions as to the general salience of key justice areas are offered relative to a national culture's overall organizational justice preferences and tendencies.     

司法的中国特色

中国司法在实现现代化的进程中,存在着“本土化”与“普适化”碰撞和平衡的难题与困境.政治制度的复杂多样性、司法文化传统、国情、大国崛起的使命、政治主体的自决性等多元因素,决定了中国司法应当保持自身特色.与世界通行司法规律兼容,体现高效、便捷,满足民众实质正义的心理期待,维护社会稳定,捍卫国家主权,推进法治国家建设目标的实现,是中国司法应当具有的特色.合理平衡和协调政治化的司法与技术化的司法、专业化的司法与大众化的司法、克制化的司法与能动化的司法,是打造司法的中国特色的重要路径.     

儒、道传统文化对生态正义的推助

中国儒、道传统文化中的朴素自然观照应了现代生态正义的应有之义,也就是现代社会所倡导的生态文明观的基本意旨。只有在优秀的生态文化背景之下,中国才能够找到反思生态问题的契机,并在实践中提出加强生态文明建设的倡导。中国儒、道传统文化中的生态思想潜移默化,预示着当代社会文明的新的正义归属。在生态危机与现代文明的冲突中,中国传统文化在孕育着解决这一矛盾冲突的文化力量之时,仍然扮演着作为思想自觉、精神教化的重要角色。     

Urgent issues and prospects at the intersection of culture,memory, and witness interviews: Exploring the challenges for research and practice

The pursuit of justice increasingly relies on productive interactions between witnesses and investigators from diverse cultural backgrounds during investigative interviews. To date, the role of cultural context has largely been ignored by researchers in the field of investigative interviewing, despite repeated requests from practitioners and policymakers for evidence-based guidance for the conduct of interviews with people from different cultures. Through examining cultural differences in human memory and communication and considering specific contextual challenges for investigative interviewing through the lens of culture, this review and associated commentaries highlight the scope for considering culture and human diversity in research on, and the practice of, investigative interviewing with victims, witnesses, and other sources. Across 11 commentaries, contributors highlight the importance of considering the role of culture in different investigative interviewing practices (e.g., rapport building, questioning techniques) and contexts (e.g., gender-based violence, asylum seeking, child abuse), address common areas of cultural mismatch between interviewer–interviewee expectations, and identify critical future routes for research. We call for an increased focus in the investigative interviewing literature on the nature and needs of our global community and encourage constructive and collaborative discussion between researchers and practitioners from around the world to better identify specific challenges and work together towards evidence-based solutions.     

论刑事法的历史分析

历史分析，作为法学重要的研究方法之一，对于刑事法研究具有积极意义。对中国当代刑事法进行历史分析，并非去发现所谓的“民族精神”，而是寻找刑事法律制度得以形成的脉络，以及在法制演进中的政治、经济和文化因素。在刑事法学研究中运用这种分析方法，具体表现为历史比较研究、历史的社会研究以及历史的价值研究。对中国刑事法发展作历史研究，应区分不同时代，并有目的性地进行研究，进而挖掘其中可为当代刑事法发展利用的有益因素。     

Immature offenders. A critical history of the representations of the offender in restorative justice

This paper reconstructs and discusses how the ‘offender’ is represented within policy documents, legal statutes and scholarly literature on restorative justice, published and circulated in England and Wales over the last thirty years. The research first outlines the most wide-ranging and recurrent images and implicit assumptions of the offender in restorative justice. A set of specific offender’s features will be singled out, and the ‘ideal offender’ of restorative justice will be profiled. The final step of this work consists of mapping out the cultural context within which this ideal has emerged, in a historical perspective. The overall goal is to shed light on some taken-for-granted images surrounding the offender in restorative justice, and on the cultural context within which they have developed. In this way, it is possible to contribute toward the critical re-assessment of restorative justice whilst considering implications beyond the British context.     

Cultural Criminology and Sex Work: Resisting Regulation through Radical Democracy and Participatory Action Research (PAR)

Taking a feminist cultural criminological analysis to the regulation of sex work in the United Kingdom, this paper argues against the dominant deviancy and the increasingly abolitionist criminal justice model for regulating sex work. The paper begins by offering a critique of the dominant regulatory regimes which have operated since the Victorian era, amended in part in the 1950s with Wolfenden, and currently being reinscribed with the Home Office strategy on prostitution and various pieces of legislation. The focus is specifically upon research with female sex workers and the usefulness of using Participatory Action research methodologies (PAR) with sex workers, agencies, and policy makers in order to foreground the diverse voices and experiences of sex workers, challenge the current focus on abolitionist criminal justice regimes and outcomes, and offer an alternative framework for a cultural materialist analysis of sex work, drawing upon the work of Nancy Fraser.     

Remembering the children: decolonizing community-based restorative justice for Indian Residential Schools

This article argues for community-based justice to confront the atrocities of residential schools in Canada. After considering the strengths of community-based restorative justice (CBRJ) in relation to state-sponsored transitional justice responses, I examine a case study of the Remembering the Children Society (RCS), an Indigenous church partnership, that has worked to commemorate children who lost their lives at the Red Deer Industrial School. The RCS engages in a decolonizing form of CBRJ by placing primacy on Indigenous cultures through (1) feasts and ceremonies, (2) freeing the spirits of children who died, (3) the centrality of elders, and (4) Aboriginal spirituality and world views on ‘working together’. The centrality of cultures contributes to decolonization through (1) cultural resistance in the face of assimilation, (2) the healing power of cultural resurgence, (3) the development of mutually honoring partnerships, and (4) the telling of decolonizing truths. In conclusion, I consider the broader impacts of the RCS in helping transform official narratives about residential schools.     

变革时代政法人的司法使命——沃伦与王胜俊能动司法哲学观比较

从社会现实出发，寻找正确的司法哲学指导司法活动，积极回应时代的司法需求，是政法人的时代司法使命。作为中关司法能动的主要倡导者，沃伦和王胜俊都主张司法应积极回应政治和变革时代的民众权利需求，高度关注弱势群体的权利保障，关注社会实质正义，注重司法结果衡平。但由于生活的政治、意识形态、文化和社会历史背景等巨大差异，二人对于能动司法的理解当然也不完全相同。