漂流“飘”出的健康权官司

激情漂流遭遇不测 提起漂流,位于河南省平顶山市鲁山县境内的山水漂流是旅游的热点.这里河水湍急,落差大,惊险刺激,漂流河道时宽时窄,变幻莫测,最宽处达30m,最窄处只有5m,既有急流险滩,又有平湖深潭,堪称夏季漂流的理想河段.许多游客不远千里而来,为的就是体验漂流的刺激和快感.一到夏天,这里就成了人山人海的世界.然而,在这热闹的背后,却有着一些让人意想不到的隐患.     

失主变被告人,项链盗窃案反转闹剧

为了追回借给好友的项链,安徽籍男青年张通(化名)向北京市公安局朝阳分局小关派出所报案,称好友王虎(化名)在北京市朝阳区某宿舍内窃取自己一条价值3万多元的项链,导致王虎于2015年11月2日被警方刑事拘留.在立案调查过程中,失主张通在接受询问时主动交代了诬告陷害他人的事实.张通非但没有追回项链,反而把自己变身为被告,陷入囹圄中.     

给私生女的50万元白条抚养费

已过天命之年的赵武胜与相差20多岁的女子婚外生下一女儿.他承诺以自家财产作担保,签下了一次性给付非婚生女儿50万元的《抚养协议书》.经过两级法院审理认定,该协议因侵犯赵武胜配偶的合法权益而不具有法律效力. 婚外生女惹纷争 赵武胜家住江苏省海门市,时年53岁,与发妻共同养育的女儿已经成年.凭借熟练的水电工技术,赵武胜走南闯北四处揽活,家境渐渐殷实.不过,家庭财政大权全由赵武胜的妻子把持,赵武胜手头并没有可以支配的资产.     

被礼金“绑架”的乡村

礼尚往来,是中国人悠久的传统习俗,也是中国传统文化的积淀,应该加以宣传和发扬.然而,记者近期走访发现,在农村的个别地区,借各种理由大摆酒席收礼的风气浓厚. 沉重的礼金过度强调了“礼”的价值,却歪曲了“礼”的内涵,本来增进感情、互帮互助的美德,却变了色彩和味道. 无论是辽宁的李明强、江苏的王保山还是山东的孙占发,面对沉重的人情债时都显得有几分不解和无奈.孙占发说:“那又有什么办法呢!在我们农村,名声和面子有时候比性命还重要.”     

监管失职是“毒跑道”屡现的根源

有望终结“毒跑道”的最后一击终于出现了.2016年6月21日,中央电视台财经频道的《经济半小时》栏目播出了“谁制造了‘毒跑道'”专题,记者通过暗访调查曝光了距离北京不到200公里的“毒跑道”黑作坊.这些作坊把废轮胎、废电缆以及说不清来源的工业橡胶废料打碎后生产制造“毒跑道”的原料.     

热烈祝贺陕西省十一届人大一次会议隆重召开坚持科学发展谋求率先突破中共勉县县委书记王隆庆勉县人民政府县长王山稳

"十六大"以来的五年.勉县县委、县政府以科学发展观统领经济社会发展全局,走上了又好又快发展之路,步入崭新的发展阶段.一个昔日名不见经传的农业大县,在"十五"末踏上了又好又快的发展之路,近两年来,全县生产总值年均增长15%以上,增速稳居汉中市各县区之首;近年来,先后2646户无电户告别了煤油灯,265户茅草房住户搬进了新居,34万农民看病不再难……连续4年被评为"全市综合工作先进县".     

物权法与普通民事纠纷

《物权法》的颁布,为维护国家基本经济制度、维护社会主义市场经济秩序、保护权利人的物权提供了民事法律依据,同时也为不久的将来我国民法典的问世打下了坚实基础,其意义重大、深远.但本文的视角是在微观层面,选取几类百姓日常生活中已经出现或者可能出现的民事纠纷,结合《物权法》的相关规定加以分析运用,以飨读者.这些问题,在《民法通则》中未有规定或规定甚少,之所以称"普通民事纠纷"是为了与司法实践中主要发生于单位之间的"经济纠纷"以示区别.……     

跳楼冤案终获赔偿

2007年元旦这天,宣汉县鸡唱乡大坪村一社瘫痪10年的龚维周,委托家人赶了300里路程,将自己亲手绣着"秉公执法,还我公正"的鞋垫,赠送给了宣汉县检察院渎职侵权检察科的干警们,以此感谢检察官严查10年前原鸡唱乡党委书记高泽孝、公安员肖光奎非法控制其人身自由,导致其跳楼致残瘫痪至今的非法拘禁案,使他终于获得了迟到的公正和高额的赔偿金.     

错爱以后

2005年9月的一天,24岁的"环球小姐"中国江西赛区亚军、南昌电视台<今夜侃侃侃>节目主持人高璐,在北京应一家时尚杂志社之约到一家摄影工作室拍广告照片,给她拍照的摄影师叫陈华新.拍照后陈华新对高璐说他跟多家时尚杂志合作,希望高璐经常来拍照,他可以把她的照片上封面,并且很绅士地向高璐索要联系电话.上封面是很多女青年梦寐以求的愿望,高璐就高兴地把自己的手机号码给了他.……     

广东警官学院“升本”表彰大会

2月17日下午，澳大利亚昆士兰州警察学院马克&#183;帕拉斯督察、丹尼尔博士，昆士兰州政府驻香港代表李世荣一行3人到我院参观访问。院党委书记陈玉川主持交流会，向来宾介绍了学院情况。副院长杨卫平，以及办公室，教务处、培训部、图书馆、治安系、公共课部、侦察系等部门负责人与会座谈。客人们参观了校园。此次来访，增进了学院与澳洲昆士兰州警方的交流及联系，     

行政规范性文件之民事司法适用

我国民事司法实践中,行政规范性文件是重要裁判说理依据。行政规范性文件民事司法适用之法理基础,在于其是我国规范等级体系的有机组成部分、是我国民法非正式法源,且在公私法融合的背景下,行政规范性文件也无可避免地需要适用于民事司法。行政规范性文件的民事司法适用分为法源与非法源意义上的适用。非法源意义上的适用,指行政规范性文件"为认定事实之依据"。法源意义上的民事司法适用规则,包括形式、实质、程序三个方面。     

论规范性文件不予一并审查:判断要素及其认定规则——基于1799份裁判文书的分析

规范性文件“能否一并审查”是对规范性文件合法性进行实质审查的先决问题。根据现有的制度规定,可将司法实践中规范性文件不予一并审查的类型划分为基础性要件缺失、附带性要件缺失和例外情形等三类,每种类型都包含多种情形和不同判断要素。法院应当采取更加积极宽容的态度,尽可能地将更多的规范性文件纳入一并审查的范围。对于不予一并审查的规范性文件的认定,应当在区分规范性文件与非规范性文件的基础上,综合运用多种认定标准明确界定规范性文件排除审查的范围。应当赋予第三人一并审查的请求主体资格,并明确当事人延迟提出一并审查请求“正当理由”的判断标准。对于不予一并审查例外情形的认定,应审慎对待,严格约束法院司法裁量权的行使。     

A functional taxonomy of normative conflict

In this paper I argue for three theses. First, most philosophical analyses of the problem of normative conflict, being based on the impossibility-of-joint-compliance test for conflict, are inadequate. Second, expanding on suggestions made by H. L. A. Hart and Stephen Munzer, I develop an understanding of normative conflict which is not tied to the concept of obedience. Such an understanding of normative conflict is expressly functional: normative conflicts arise when one norm interferes with the intended functioning of another. Third, working from a functional concept of normative conflict, I develop a taxonomical classification scheme for the phenomenon of normative conflict. Normative conflict is the genus within which there are three species: normative contradiction, normative collision, and normative competition. Department of Philosophy, Southeast Missouri State University, Cape Girardeau, MO 63701, U.S.A.     

论制定行政规范性文件之行为属性

行政规范性文件违法在我国当前是一个越来越严重的问题,由法院对各种行政规范性文件是否违法进行审查已受到社会各界的重视。对行政机关制定规范性文件的行为属性进行分析,可以看出其行政性、执行性的特征,本质上属于行政行为,而非立法行为,这是我国法院对行政规范性文件进行司法审查的理论前提。     

规范性文件行政复议制度

行政复议法第 7条确立了规范性文件行政复议制度。然而 ,该制度在操作过程中存在较大困难 ,导致该制度形同虚设 ,给行政法治实践制造了诸多新的问题。其根本原因在于 ,规范性文件行政复议的理论困乏。有必要在行政法理论上给规范性文件行政复议一个初步的定位 ,如对公民完全诉愿权的肯定、对规范化层级行政监督权的肯定、对全面司法审查的隐含肯定等。通过定位合乎逻辑地建立起理性的规范性文件行政复议制度 ,该制度的实质在于使规范性文件行政复议独立化、全面化 ,并强化复议机关审查的权威性。     

论中央部委间关系的协调

中央部委作为国务院的职能部门,难以凭一己之力单独执行政策,必须有其他部委、地方政府及地方各部门的配合,形成合力来实现行政目标.在法律有冲突、职能存交叉、部门本位主义、缺乏宏观引导的境况下,多个部门制定的行政规章和规范性文件之间常有矛盾,政策执行过程也时有冲突.因此,协调中央部委间关系的路径在于：优化法治环境,法律主动介入协调；优化组织结构,明确部委职能；平等信任兼容,建立常设协调机构；多方协同联合,成立独立机关或合理授权；规范政策制定和执行程序,促成部委间关系的健康平稳有序发展.     

Bushwhacking the Ethical High Road: Conflict of Interest in the Practice of Law and Real Life

A long‐standing scholarly tradition regards professions, in general, and ethics rules, in particular, as “projects” of market control. It is no surprise, critics charge, that in the latest assault on the monopoly of the American legal profession–waged by multidisciplinary professional service firms–lawyers are hiding behind their ethics rules to protect their turf. In this article, I report on an extensive empirical study of conflict of interest in private legal practice and look comparatively at other fiduciaries, among them, accountants, psychotherapists, physicians, journalists, and academics. I investigate the role of ethics rules that seek to insure fiduciary loyalty in structuring the delivery of services. How does social and institutional change, roiling the fiduciary world, threaten disinterestedness and loyalty and how, if at all, do fiduciaries respond? How is the regulation of conflict of interest accomplished? Where are the conflicts rules most likely to be honored or ignored? What incentive structures encourage compliance? What are the costs and unexpected consequences of compliance? What is foregone? And is it all worth it? In what might come as a surprise to many, I find that the legal profession takes conflict of interest more seriously than many of the rest of us. As the title implies, legal practitioners largely travel alone, bushwhacking through the underbrush snarling the ethical high road. As critical scholarship predicted, lawyers do enjoy a monopoly at the end of the road. But this monopoly is achieved, not by restraint of trade or some other artifice or stratagem of market control, but by lack of competition. It seems that no one else is trudging alongside the lawyers. Lawyers are not necessarily more ethical than the others; they just behave more ethically–at least with respect to conflict of interest. The question is why. And what difference does it make?     

规范性文件制定过程中的法律风险及其防范

规范性文件制定主体在制定规范性文件时面临因操作不规范、制定内容不合理或者有其他不符合法律规定情形的法律风险。因此。规范性文件制定过程中存在因法律风险而带来的责任承担问题。要防范规范性文件制定中的法律风险,必须具备制定主体适格、内容合法合理、程序正当等基本要件。     

地方政府实施商标战略的省思

近年来,国内掀起了一股实施商标战略的热潮,多个地方政府制定并颁布了实施商标战略的规范性文件。然而,地方政府实施商标战略的目标以及地方政府实施的＂重金奖励驰名商标＂、＂政府优先采购驰名商标及著名商标称号获得者的产品＂、＂鼓励商号与商标的一体化＂等商标战略措施都值得省思。     

Training parenting plan evaluators: Looking towards the future

Standards of practice for parenting plan evaluations continue to evolve, informed by advances in research and the development of innovative, evidence-based approaches to assessment and intervention. Parenting plan evaluators are asked to inform the court, parents, and other professionals on how to address the complex needs of increasingly diverse families amid reorganization, high conflict, and crisis. How can we attract and properly train new mental health professionals to do important work in an increasingly strained adversarial system? How can evaluators keep up with these advances over the course of their careers? How can they deepen and refine their skills to work with a diverse array of individuals, family constellations and an enormous range of family circumstances? And how can evaluators care for their own well-being and their colleagues? In this article, the authors describe a multi-dimensional approach to training both new and experienced custody evaluators that includes imparting baseline knowledge on how to conduct quality parenting plan evaluations as a starting point. We discuss a variety of modalities and approaches that can enable evaluators to deepen and expand their skills over the years, contribute to the diverse community of family law professionals, and manage the exceptional demands of working in this field.