当前保外就医鉴定工作中存在的问题及对策

正保外就医是监外执行的一种刑法制度,保外就医鉴定中存在的问题逐渐显现。笔者结合工作实际,浅谈当前保外就医鉴定工作中存在的问题及建议。1当前保外就医鉴定存在的主要问题1.1鉴定程序规范缺失《暂予监外执行规定》(以下简称"规定")就罪犯保外就医申请鉴定程序等进行了规定,但对于医院环节的鉴定程序、鉴定医院及医师的权利、义务以及法律责任没有作出规定。但对带押干警与鉴定人员的     

看守所收押罪犯保外就医医学鉴定探索

目前有关看守所收押罪犯保外就医医学鉴定的法律规定尚不够规范，看守所收押罪犯保外就医的医学鉴定存在很多问题。要规范看守所收押罪犯保外就医的医学鉴定，就应加快刑罚执行方面的立法完善，规范保外就医等执法行为；建立统一的保外就医鉴定机构准入制度，改变当前鉴定机构的乱、杂局面；针对保外就医出现的新情况，建议尽快构建《看守所收押罪犯保外就医执行办法》及其实施细则和标准.     

保外就医执法活动亟待规范

一是办理程序不合法。《刑诉法》和《监狱法》对办理罪犯保外就医的程序作了严格的规定。《罪犯保外就医执行办法》亦对办理罪犯保外就医的程序亦规定得明确、具体。据调查,某监狱在办理罪犯保外就医时,有的没有严格按照有关法律规定的程序,而是监狱某领导签字后就对罪犯实施了保外就医,严重影响了法律的严肃性。     

罪犯保外就医法医学文证审查278例

总结2006～2008年福建省长乐市检察技术部门所受理的278例＂罪犯保外就医＂文证审查案例,发现：看守所系统的不符合率明显高于监狱系统;在分系统疾病调查中,循环系统、神经系统以及各类传染病的不符合率明显较高。分析原因,可能为：保外就医审批渠道多,缺乏统一规范;鉴定标准陈旧,不符合当前形势;鉴定人适用标准不够严格;缺少鉴定人资质审查机制;鉴定程序不规范,管理混乱。建议从完善鉴定标准、强化审批管理、加强检察监督等方面规范、提高保外就医病残鉴定工作。     

将保外就医鉴定纳入司法鉴定登记管理

保外就医鉴定在罪犯保外就医中处于核心地位、关键环节，罪犯最终能否被裁定予以保外就医，关键取决于医院对其所患疾病是否属于保外就医疾病伤残范围的认定，实践中存在诸多问题。分析当前保外就医鉴定的现状及存在的主要问题．根据我国的司法鉴定登记管理体制，论证将保外就医鉴定纳入到司法鉴定登记管理体制范畴的可行性。     

浅谈高血压病人保外就医

自1990年《罪犯保外就医执行办法》(以下称《办法》)实施以来,罪犯保外就医工作得到了有效规范。但高血压病人的保外就医在医学上有一定争议。本文就高血压病人保外就医的有关法律规定和医学问题进行讨论,旨在引起医学和法医学工作者以及相关部门的重视和关注,规范相关标准和检查,使高血压病人的保外就医有序开展。1高血压病人保外就医的有关法律规定     

保外就医监督中法医不应缺位

有资料显示:在违反法定条件办理保外就医的案件中,与罪犯的病残鉴定直接有关的(如不符合保外就医疾病病残范围规定)占76．9％,与鉴定相关的(如保外就医期限超过法定时间)占17．3％,合计占94．2％;在违反法定程序办理保外就医的案件中, 与鉴定直接相关的(如决定保外就医的医学证明文件不符合法律规定)占44．7％;在保外就医罪犯执行     

浅谈高血压病人保外就医

正自1990年《罪犯保外就医执行办法》(以下称《办法》)实施以来,罪犯保外就医工作得到了有效规范。但高血压病人的保外就医在医学上有一定争议。本文就高血压病人保外就医的有关法律规定和医学问题进行讨论,旨在引起医学和法医学工作者以及相关部门的重视和关注,规范相关标准和检查,使高血压病人的保外就医有序开展。1高血压病人保外就医的有关法律规定     

河北八项要求规范暂予监外执行

河北省高级人民法院日前下发《关于进一步规范全省法院决定暂予监外执行工作的紧急通知》，明确八项要求，就各级法院在决定暂予监外执行工作中需要从严把握的几个方面进行了进一步规范。《通知》要求，必须从严把握严重疾病需要保外就医的范围；对适用保外就医可能有社会危险性，或者自伤自残的罪犯，不得保外就医；妥善处理看守所拒收的问题，绝对不允许降低法律标准，违法做出暂予监外执行的决定；对中央政法委要求从严把握的职务犯罪、破坏金融管理秩序和金融诈骗犯罪、组织（领导、参加、包庇、纵容）黑社会性质组织犯罪的罪犯适用保外就医，要从严把握；各级法院根据案件具体情况，对暂予监外执行的罪犯至多两年期间一次，进行一次考核，并根据考核结果决定是否继续暂予监外执行；充分发挥检察机关的监督职能；严格审批程序；对决定暂予监外执行的承办人、批准人等实行严格责任制。     

当前保外就医病残鉴定工作中存在的问题

保外就医是在押罪犯因病获准在外医治的一种司法制度。《刑事诉讼法》第214条、《监狱法》第25条对暂予监外执行（保外就医）的疾病条件都作了明确规定。为了加强对保外就医的法律监督．2004年福州市监所检察部门委托福州市院检察技术处对2002—2004年“罪犯保外就医”的相关医学资料进行审查。本文结合这次审查的情况．对当前罪犯保外就医鉴定符合率较低的原因进行剖析。希望对完善和加强这项鉴定活动的监督有所裨益。     

A scale for measuring propensity for abusiveness

A brief self-report is described that assesses propensity for male abusiveness of a female partner in intimate relationships. The Propensity for Abusiveness Scale (PAS) items is nonreactive and contains no explicit reference to abusive behavior. The scale has good psychometric properties, with Cronbach's alpha of 0.91 and three distinct factors. Data were provided by 140 men in treatment for wife assault and by 63 of their female partners. In addition, 44 demographically matched men and 33 of their partners were evaluated. The scale was validated against reports of abuse victimization by men's female partners using the Psychological Maltreatment of Women Inventory (Tolman, 1988). The scale correlated 0.51 with women's reports of male Domination/Isolation tactics, and 0.47 with Emotional Abuse scale scores. A discriminant function for high versus low abusiveness indicated that the PAS correctly classified 82.2% of men into high (one standard deviation below) abusiveness. Social desirability corrections do not significantly change the trend of correlations of the PAS with criterion variables. A cross validation of the scale supported the initial results. The scale also correlates significantly with physical abuse.     

Ethics for Lawyers or Ethics for Citizens? New Directions for Legal Education

The Lord Chancellor's Advisory Committee on Legal Education andConduct (ACLEC) has called for the reconstruction of the ethicalfoundations of legal education. However, it has not justified its premisethat teaching legal values at the initial stage will enhance professionallegal ethics. It is argued that the present system of education, given itstechnocratic, individualistic, and authoritarian tendencies, cannot meetACLEC's challenge. A more ethical legal education can be envisagedwithin a neo-Aristotelian framework. This perspective emphasizes thereflexivity between micro and macro ethics, and utilizes the active andparticipatory learning approaches which should enable students to engagein meaningful moral discourse and problem solving.     

外观设计专利授权的实质要件探讨

外观设计专利新颖性有绝对新颖性、相对新颖性和缓和新颖性三种。我国正在修订的专利法宜继续坚持混合新颖性标准,其比较对象原则上应限于产品外观设计.抵触申请也可破坏外观设计专利申请的新颖性。我国外观设计专利应引入创造性标准,对同一申请人同日在相同产品上中请的多个相似外观设计,不宜被认定为重复授权。此外,我国外观设计专利应继续坚持“美感”标准。     

Challenges for teaching interaction skills for law students

Abstract

Are lawyers witty courtroom heroes or professionals working with and for people? Is law only universal judgements and afterthoughts or could it also be preventive and proactive individual planning and dialogue? The traditional legal education could be seen to have been based on the first assumptions. The course “Interaction skills for lawyers”, in the Faculty of Law at the University of Helsinki (Finland), evolves instead from the latter assumptions. In this article we relate our starting points in planning the course and evaluate our challenges and experiences in developing it.     

Cooperation Challenges for the Special Tribunal for Lebanon

While the Agreement between the United Nations and Lebanon providesa solid framework for cooperation between the Special Tribunaland Lebanon, Security Council Resolution 1757 (2007) is silenton the duty of third states to assist the Tribunal. As a result,the Special Tribunal will be confronted with a variety of obstaclesand problems in obtaining their cooperation, which may seriouslyhamper its functioning.     

论刑事审判监督程序的理论基础

对我国刑事审判监督程序进行改革和完善 ,就要对刑事再审制度的理论基础进行深入研究。对于西方国家既判力理论、避免双重危险理论等原则中所体现的有益价值观 ,也应从我国的实际出发 ,在构建我国刑事再审制度的理论基础中加以吸收。通过研究刑事再审制度的理论基础 ,推动刑事诉讼改革 ,逐步建立和完善中国特色的刑事再审制度 ,努力促进在全社会实现公平和正义的目标。     

Association for Conflict Resolution Guidelines for Eldercaring Coordinators

On November 6, 2014, the AFCC Board of Directors endorsed the Association for Conflict Resolution (ACR) Guidelines for Eldercaring Coordination, including ethical principles for Eldercaring Coordinators, training protocols, and court pilot project template. The collaboration between Task Forces created by ACR and the Florida Chapter of AFCC, composed of twenty U.S./Canadian and twenty Florida‐wide organizations, produced both an overarching guide to assist in the development of programs and a more detailed model addressing state/province‐specific needs and characteristics. Eldercaring coordination is a dispute resolution option specifically for high‐conflict cases involving the care, needs, and safety of elders.

Key Points for the Family Court Community:
• There are currently no dispute resolution options for parties involved in high‐conflict cases regarding the care, needs, and safety of an elder.
• The ACR Guidelines for Eldercaring Coordination address the discrepancies between dispute resolution options available for parents in conflict regarding their minor children and mature families with unresolved concerns about the care, needs, and safety of an elder.
• The ACR Guidelines for Eldercaring Coordination provide information regarding the ethical practice of eldercaring coordination including a specific definition, recommended qualifications, ethical practices, grievance procedures, training protocols, and a court pilot project template.
• The practice of eldercaring coordination will address the influx of court cases expected as baby boomers continue to age, reducing delays in court hearings, as parties will have the opportunity to resolve their concerns without continuous court attention.
• As of June 2015, five states began Pilot Projects on Eldercaring Coordination, which will be studied by an independent research group to enhance the progress of the process and to develop the best practices for initiating the programs elsewhere.

     

永远怀念郑成思老师

2006年9月10日,当全中国的教师们还在以各自的方式感受第22个教师节的时候,你走了。我们只是感到突然,但并不意外。因为从你的病情被确诊的那一刻起我们就知道,这一天,正在一步一步向我们逼近。一年多来,每当星期二上班或有其他聚会的时候,我们总是小心翼翼地谈到你,三言两语而已。因为我们深怕对你的健康的担忧和牵挂会让我们没有办法若无其事地工作和生活。我们一直有一种凄然的默契:没有你的消息就是