如何增强检察机关在庭前程序中的主导地位

新的庭审方式要求检察机关强化公诉职能,加强侦查部门与公诉部门的联系,以保障公诉对证据的要求能够充分实现,但由于目前诉讼体制的制约以及工作中存在的一些问题,这项工作尚存在不足之处。应当通过坚持运用提前介入制度以及听证制度等方式,更好地实现上述目标,树立检察机关在庭前程序中的主导地位。     

修改后的刑诉法对反贪污贿赂工作提出了更高要求

修改后的刑事诉讼法适应国家法制发展和打击犯罪的实际需要，对立案管辖、辩护代理、强制措施、侦查手段、庭审方式等一系列问题作了重大修改．这无疑将更加有利于规范和促进检察机关的反贪污贿赂工作。另一方面．修改后的刑诉法对侦查、审查起诉等工作规定了严格的操作程序．庭审方式的改革加重了检察人员出庭支持公诉的责任．对检察机关反贪污贿赂工作提出了更高要求。（一）缩小了检察机关立案管辖的范围．将检察机关反贪污贿赂工作的打击对象主要局限于国家工作人员．而企业人员职务犯罪将不再查处，这样使得检察机关自行发现国家工作人…     

重大案件介入侦查机制探析及完善

正新刑事诉讼法更加注重"庭审中心模式"的构建与强化,并且进一步完善了非法证据排除规则,这无疑对侦查机关和检察机关严格公正规范执法的水平提出了更高要求。而另一方面,犯罪现象也在发生新的变化,智能犯罪、涉众型犯罪等疑难复杂案件日益增加,人民群众对侦查机关和检察机关准确及时有效打     

检察机关与侦查、审判机关配合制约机制的现状分析及完善

在我国刑事诉讼制度中,检察机关与侦查机关之间主要围绕侦查分工和追诉目标形成相应的配合制约机制;检察机关与审判机关之间则围绕查清犯罪事实和管辖程序展开配合、围绕裁判和审理程序展开制约。检察机关主要通过通知立案、通知撤案、不捕、不诉、追捕、追诉、纠正违法等方式对侦查机关进行制约,侦查机关则通过对不捕、不诉决定的复议、复核等方式对检察机关进行制约;检察机关主要通过抗诉和纠正违法对审判机关进行制约,审判机关则通过无罪判决、改变指控等对检察机关进行制约。在司法实践中,检察机关还通过侦诉协作、附条件逮捕、建议撤案和地方政法委协调等方式与侦查机关和审判机关进行配合。总体而言,在检察机关与侦查、审判机关之间的配合制约体系中还存在制约范围不全面、制约手段有限、制约结构不稳定、配合机制缺乏约束力、配合范围不明确、考核评价机制不协调等问题。对此,应当分别加以解决和完善。     

论新形势下反贪模式的转变

随着国家政治经济体制改革的不断深入进行,检察机关的执法环境、执法机制也在不断发生着变化,对检察机关的自侦工作提出了新的要求。各地检察机关以往劳动型、经验型组织侦破案件的方法,已不能适应客观形式的需要,必须及时加以转变,建立功能齐全、结构合理、运作协调、机动灵活、快速反应的侦查体系,方能适应形势的要求,推进职务犯罪侦查工作的深入开展。     

检警一体化模式再解读

我国现行的警察主导侦查模式具有重大缺陷，尤其在控辩式庭审改革的背景下愈益暴露出弊端：不仅难以满足检察机关有效指控、惩罚犯罪的需要，也无法适应侦查监督、保障人权的要求。实践中自发的检察引导侦查的改革是对现行接力型检警关系的突破，其本质是检警一体化，构成了当下诉讼程序改革与司法体制改革的一项重要创新。检警一体化模式的实质是检察机关参与侦查权的行使，而非检警机关在组织上的一体化，亦非二者角色的混同。我国建构检警一体化模式，不仅存在理论基础，而且具有法律依据。采纳这一模式有助于提升侦查质量、强化检察机关指控犯罪的能力，也便于检察机关践行侦查监督职能。     

公诉指导侦查之我见

一、公诉指导侦查的理论依据随着新《刑诉法》的实施，法官不再对检察机关提起公诉的案件进行实质性审查和交换意见，使得检察机关承担举证工作的风险性加大。从诉讼效益、证据风险、公诉的社会效果、公诉人的荣誉等各角度出发，加强公诉机关与自侦部门、公安、安全机关在侦查过程中的交流、协商是势在必行的。公诉指导侦查正是适应新的需要确立的一项诉讼制度。侦查环节由检察机关公诉部门对案件进行把关，履行侦查监督职责，变事后审查为事先提供决策性意见，使二机关的控诉地位在工作制度上形成紧密联系符合现行司法制度的效益和经济原则…     

浅议公诉引导侦查取证

随着庭审方式改革的不断深入，程序公正在司法实践中逐步得到确立，因而对起诉和侦查工作提出了更高的要求，侦查质量的高低、支持公诉是否有力，将直接关系到公诉工作的成败。目前侦查严重游离于起诉的状况已不能适应庭审改革的要求，一种起诉统帅侦查、侦查服从起诉工作的新机制呼之欲出，     

论职务犯罪侦查权的完善——以新刑事诉讼法为视角

刑事诉讼法的修改,既给检察机关提出了严峻的挑战,同时也是检察机关完成转型的一次重大机遇。新刑诉法扩大了职务犯罪侦查的证据来源;完善并拓展了侦查措施;延长传唤和拘传的期限;加强取保候审的监管;完善监视居住的执行和监控;延长自侦案件的拘留期限。同时,新刑诉法继续对职务犯罪侦查权力进行制约与规范,包括通过权力制约权力及通过权利制约权力。故职务犯罪侦查工作应该转变观念、树立信心、积极应对;加强"情报导侦"信息化;初查工作合理强化;侦查行为规范化和创新管理科学化;加快推进侦查信息化建设和装备现代化建设;提高侦查人员素质,实现侦查人才精英化。     

刑诉法修改对职务犯罪侦查工作的挑战

刑事诉讼法的修改必将对检察机关尤其是职务犯罪侦查工作产生巨大而深远的影响。无论是挑战还是机遇,检察机关职务犯罪侦查工作都应积极采取相应措施,及时调整工作思路,主动适应新修订的刑诉法的要求,努力提高办案人员的专业素养,探索出符合新刑诉法要求的现代法治理念的工作模式。     

对比分析美国应急反应指挥系统研究芯片厂应急反应组织架构与流程

芯片厂的应急反应组织属于一个非常设性组织,故在应急反应组织架构与应急反应计划的设计上容易与芯片厂实际的日常运作组织产生矛盾,不易产生有机结合,导致在意外事故处理过程中,无法达成应急反应的最佳预期效果。本文在研究分析美国的事故应急反应指挥系统组织与架构、应急反应逻辑与操作法则的基础上,参考芯片制造厂的日常工作组织与职能,为芯片制造厂规划设计符合芯片制造厂的应急反应组织与流程,分析其间的异同点,并为芯片制造厂建制应急反应体系过程提供参考资料,以有效降低意外事故对芯片制造厂的营运冲击。     

Post-nationalism and the Quest for Constitutional Substitutes

Post-nationalism is suggestive of a number of transformations in the practice of both law and politics. In the case of politics, it implies an assertion of the salience of the organization of scale, time, and individual subjectivity in the practice of politics, yet a corresponding acknowledgement that traditional administrative structures have lost their hegemony over organization of these phenomena. In the case of law, it implies a legal pluralism caused in part by administrative differentiation, but also brought about an increase in the number and types of organization that have private 'law-making' capacities. These processes are particular disruptive for the modern constitution, which has traditionally been identified as a central instrument in the recognition, co-ordination, interaction, and self-legitimation of law and politics. This begs the question as to what processes are carrying out tasks that have traditionally been associated with the modern constitution. This essay argues that the fluidity and complexity of these processes entail that they must lie in the processes of interaction themselves. In particular, it argues that the central 'constitutional substitute' is the individual act of recognizing organizations as having political and legal attributes. For the process of recognition contains two structures which serve to organize and legitimize interaction. Any act of 'constitutional' recognition requires, first, a process of prior evaluation on the part of the observer that requires the organization to justify itself to the observer. The according of recognition, by contrast, entails that the observer respect the organization as having the autonomy to impose and represent itself politically. This respect allow the organization to order legal and political life.     

Relational Justice in Organizations: The Group-Value Model and Support for Change

This paper examines the psychological dynamics of the Group-Value Model for a behavioral orientation which has seldom been considered in the social justice literature: acceptance and support for change. A field study was conducted, with 176 participants members of an organization which was undergoing a change process. Participants were asked (a) to think of a specific relevant conflict situation with their supervisor; (b) to evaluate supervisor's behavior in that situation, with respect to relational and distributive justice; (c) to state the justice aspects most valued in conflict situations with their supervisor. A test of the model was conducted through a mediation analysis. According to the Group-Value Model (GVM), respect experienced within the group and pride in the group were mediating variables between justice judgements and orientation toward acceptance and support for change in the organization. Interactional and procedural aspects (relational judgements) were the only ones to predict pride, respect, and behavioral orientation, and were also the ones most valued in general conflict situations with the supervisor. The model was also tested at three different levels of analysis: organization as a whole, department, and work group. This confirmed pride and respect within the group as mediating variables between relational justice judgements and orientation toward acceptance and support for change at the department and workgroup levels.     

韩国灾难管理体系及其对我国的启示

韩国是一个灾难频发的国家, 为了应对各种灾难及其引发的危机, 韩国在中央政府层面成立了消防防灾厅, 从而揭开了韩国灾难管理工作的新篇章。本文从组织体系和法律体系两个方面对韩国的灾难管理体系进行了分析,在此基础上, 对如何建立健全适合中国国情的灾难管理机制提出了相应的建议。     

Support for public research spin-offs by the parent organizations and the speed of commercialization

We empirically analyze whether support by the parent organization in the early (nascent and seed) stage speeds up the process of commercialization and helps spin-offs from public research organizations generate first revenues sooner. To identify the impact of support by the parent organization, we apply multivariate regression techniques as well as an instrumental variable approach. Our results show that support in the early stage by the parent organization can speed up commercialization. Moreover, we identify two distinct channels—the help in developing a business plan and in acquiring external capital—through which support by the parent organization can enable spin-offs to generate first revenues sooner.     

论构建临时团队的快速信任机制

临时团队的出现是组织应对环境快速变化的结果,已成为未来组织发展的新趋势.但是,临时团队也存在着自身固有的脆弱性,主要表现在目标不够明确、凝聚力相对薄弱、任务具有短期性、绩效比较低下等方面.这就要求在团队建立的最初阶段就应重视构建其快速信任机制,在团队成员之间尽快建立起一种彼此信任的关系,根据国内外有关研究成果,本文提出了应构建包括完善内部沟通机制、合理定位角色、建设知识共享文化等在内的三位一体模式,以加强对临时团队快速信任的管理,提高临时团队的内部凝聚力和运营绩效.     

现代商事信托的组织法基础

从民事信托到商事信托,信托关系的本质完成了从财产无偿移转的手段到企业组织架构的变革。商事信托作为组织法,其具有商事组织的典型共性,而且在制度设计和受托人信义义务的标准上,商事信托也与商事公司制度近年来出现了明显的趋同。我国现行信托立法无论是在受托人承担有限责任的规定上,还是在信托投资的规模上以及在受托人的资格取得上,都离成熟的组织法的要求还都相距甚远。     

单位犯罪与自然人犯罪的界分

由于单位犯罪的复杂性,立法放弃了对单位犯罪的定义权,从而将认定单位犯罪的任务留给了理论和实务界。犯罪是行为,行为表现意志。反过来说,意志支配行为,意志具有根本的判定作用。所以,单位意志是判定单位犯罪的最终指标,所谓以单位名义、违法所得归单位所有、为了单位利益、单位的业务范围、由单位决策机关或者负责人决定,都是单位意志的外在表现形式,是判断单位意志的辅助标志和参考因素,与单位意志之间是现象与本质、局部与整体的关系。而判定单位意志的标准,在于单位成员的行为是否符合单位长期的业务政策、规定、操作习惯,或者具有为单位谋利的动机并经过单位决策机关或者负责人决定。     

网络化：学习型组织的创建路径——以公安机关为例

学习型组织不是简单的组织学习,把公安机关的“大练兵”活动理解为就是创建学习型公安机关的观点是片面的。在组织理论中,学习型组织是针对理性官僚制组织由于职能分工、层级科制所形成的学习智障而提出的新型组织管理模式。因此,学习型组织的创建必须从组织形态的改革入手,把僵化的金字塔式的组织转变成沟通顺畅的扁平化组织。现代化的信息平台和网络化沟通,为我们提供了很好的实现组织扁平化的工具。只有在组织形态发生变革的情况下,结合公安机关建立的一系列长效学习机制,才能真正走上公安干警个人、公安机关自身不断学习、可持续发展之路。     

The Moral Justification for the Preventive Detention of Terrorists

The moral, as opposed to legal, justification for the preventive detention of terrorists is the topic of this article, and, in particular, for the preventive detention of members of extremist Islamist terrorist organizations, such as Islamic State (IS) and Al Qaeda (AQ). The article argues that preventive detention of terrorists is morally justified under certain circumstances. Its argument for preventive detention of terrorists is analogous to that used to detain enemy combatants as prisoners of war. However, rather than relying on the possession of the properties definitive of the legal status of a combatant, it relies on demonstrable possession of constitutive features of functionally integrated membership of a terrorist organization. Membership in this sense of a terrorist organization creates the presumption of a standing intention to commit murder, or at least to assist others to do so, in the service of the organization’s political ends.