漂流“飘”出的健康权官司

激情漂流遭遇不测 提起漂流,位于河南省平顶山市鲁山县境内的山水漂流是旅游的热点.这里河水湍急,落差大,惊险刺激,漂流河道时宽时窄,变幻莫测,最宽处达30m,最窄处只有5m,既有急流险滩,又有平湖深潭,堪称夏季漂流的理想河段.许多游客不远千里而来,为的就是体验漂流的刺激和快感.一到夏天,这里就成了人山人海的世界.然而,在这热闹的背后,却有着一些让人意想不到的隐患.     

失主变被告人,项链盗窃案反转闹剧

为了追回借给好友的项链,安徽籍男青年张通(化名)向北京市公安局朝阳分局小关派出所报案,称好友王虎(化名)在北京市朝阳区某宿舍内窃取自己一条价值3万多元的项链,导致王虎于2015年11月2日被警方刑事拘留.在立案调查过程中,失主张通在接受询问时主动交代了诬告陷害他人的事实.张通非但没有追回项链,反而把自己变身为被告,陷入囹圄中.     

被礼金“绑架”的乡村

礼尚往来,是中国人悠久的传统习俗,也是中国传统文化的积淀,应该加以宣传和发扬.然而,记者近期走访发现,在农村的个别地区,借各种理由大摆酒席收礼的风气浓厚. 沉重的礼金过度强调了“礼”的价值,却歪曲了“礼”的内涵,本来增进感情、互帮互助的美德,却变了色彩和味道. 无论是辽宁的李明强、江苏的王保山还是山东的孙占发,面对沉重的人情债时都显得有几分不解和无奈.孙占发说:“那又有什么办法呢!在我们农村,名声和面子有时候比性命还重要.”     

监管失职是“毒跑道”屡现的根源

有望终结“毒跑道”的最后一击终于出现了.2016年6月21日,中央电视台财经频道的《经济半小时》栏目播出了“谁制造了‘毒跑道'”专题,记者通过暗访调查曝光了距离北京不到200公里的“毒跑道”黑作坊.这些作坊把废轮胎、废电缆以及说不清来源的工业橡胶废料打碎后生产制造“毒跑道”的原料.     

给私生女的50万元白条抚养费

已过天命之年的赵武胜与相差20多岁的女子婚外生下一女儿.他承诺以自家财产作担保,签下了一次性给付非婚生女儿50万元的《抚养协议书》.经过两级法院审理认定,该协议因侵犯赵武胜配偶的合法权益而不具有法律效力. 婚外生女惹纷争 赵武胜家住江苏省海门市,时年53岁,与发妻共同养育的女儿已经成年.凭借熟练的水电工技术,赵武胜走南闯北四处揽活,家境渐渐殷实.不过,家庭财政大权全由赵武胜的妻子把持,赵武胜手头并没有可以支配的资产.     

物权法与普通民事纠纷

《物权法》的颁布,为维护国家基本经济制度、维护社会主义市场经济秩序、保护权利人的物权提供了民事法律依据,同时也为不久的将来我国民法典的问世打下了坚实基础,其意义重大、深远.但本文的视角是在微观层面,选取几类百姓日常生活中已经出现或者可能出现的民事纠纷,结合《物权法》的相关规定加以分析运用,以飨读者.这些问题,在《民法通则》中未有规定或规定甚少,之所以称"普通民事纠纷"是为了与司法实践中主要发生于单位之间的"经济纠纷"以示区别.……     

错爱以后

2005年9月的一天,24岁的"环球小姐"中国江西赛区亚军、南昌电视台<今夜侃侃侃>节目主持人高璐,在北京应一家时尚杂志社之约到一家摄影工作室拍广告照片,给她拍照的摄影师叫陈华新.拍照后陈华新对高璐说他跟多家时尚杂志合作,希望高璐经常来拍照,他可以把她的照片上封面,并且很绅士地向高璐索要联系电话.上封面是很多女青年梦寐以求的愿望,高璐就高兴地把自己的手机号码给了他.……     

跳楼冤案终获赔偿

2007年元旦这天,宣汉县鸡唱乡大坪村一社瘫痪10年的龚维周,委托家人赶了300里路程,将自己亲手绣着"秉公执法,还我公正"的鞋垫,赠送给了宣汉县检察院渎职侵权检察科的干警们,以此感谢检察官严查10年前原鸡唱乡党委书记高泽孝、公安员肖光奎非法控制其人身自由,导致其跳楼致残瘫痪至今的非法拘禁案,使他终于获得了迟到的公正和高额的赔偿金.     

热烈祝贺陕西省十一届人大一次会议隆重召开坚持科学发展谋求率先突破中共勉县县委书记王隆庆勉县人民政府县长王山稳

"十六大"以来的五年.勉县县委、县政府以科学发展观统领经济社会发展全局,走上了又好又快发展之路,步入崭新的发展阶段.一个昔日名不见经传的农业大县,在"十五"末踏上了又好又快的发展之路,近两年来,全县生产总值年均增长15%以上,增速稳居汉中市各县区之首;近年来,先后2646户无电户告别了煤油灯,265户茅草房住户搬进了新居,34万农民看病不再难……连续4年被评为"全市综合工作先进县".     

广东警官学院“升本”表彰大会

2月17日下午，澳大利亚昆士兰州警察学院马克&#183;帕拉斯督察、丹尼尔博士，昆士兰州政府驻香港代表李世荣一行3人到我院参观访问。院党委书记陈玉川主持交流会，向来宾介绍了学院情况。副院长杨卫平，以及办公室，教务处、培训部、图书馆、治安系、公共课部、侦察系等部门负责人与会座谈。客人们参观了校园。此次来访，增进了学院与澳洲昆士兰州警方的交流及联系，     

The Roman Law Tradition and Its Future Development in China

In Late Qing Dynasty, the Chinese Law Family was disintegrated and the Western Law was introduced into China. Finally, China adopted the European continental Roman law tradition. This paper analyzes the reason for China’s borrowing of such legal system and probes its development and reform in the later years. It also tries to answer the question of what will be the possible impact upon the current Chinese legal system since China now implements the policy of “one country two systems” in order to realize its reunification with Hong Kong, Macau and Taiwan. In addition, it will make some prediction upon the future development of Chinese legal system. Translated from Tsinghua Law Review, Vol. 2, 1999 (in Chinese)     

沦"儿童最大利益优先原则"在中国的确立——兼论《婚姻法》等相关法律的不足及其完善

International documents like the Declaration of the Rights of the Child (1959) and the Convention on the Rights of the Child (1989) propose that in mediating on children issues, the best interests of the child should be the primary consideration. In China, the Constitution and the Law on the Protection of Minors have already set out the terms in principle for the protection of minors, however, it has not been defined in the Marriage Law (2001). In order to enforce the commitment of respecting and safeguarding human rights, the child’s best interest principle should be established in marriage and family law, along with amending related provisions. Chen Wei is a professor of law, and director of the Research Center for Foreign Family Law and Women Theories in the China Southwest University of Political Science and Law. She is in the teachings of civil law, family law, law of succession, the history of civil law and comparative family law for years. During 2003–2004, Prof. Chen, being a visiting scholar, studied foreign family laws in the Faculty of Law, Sydney University. In academic field, she has published over 50 research articles in China and abroad; and her monograph is Research on the Legislations of Marriage and Family Law of China (2000). Further, she has taken charge of editing over 10 books, for instance, A Comparative Study of Family Laws between the Mainland and Hong Kong, Macao and Taiwan of China (2002), A Comparative Study of Foreign Marriage and Family Law (2006) and A Comparative Study of Succession Laws among the Mainland, Hong Kong, Macao and Taiwan of China (2007).     

论破产法上债务人高管人员民事责任的追究

The Enterprise Bankruptcy Law has designed the regime for debtor’s senior managers to bear civil liabilities, while the framework design concerning the prosecution mechanism of civil liabilities is still unclear. How to establish a prosecution mechanism of civil liabilities of debtor’s senior managers in line with the purposes of the bankruptcy regime is a substantial issue during the implementation of Enterprise Bankruptcy Law. The realization of the civil liabilities regime of debtor’s senior managers depends on the establishment and operation of a relatively well-developed prosecution mechanism of civil liabilities. The focus of the prosecution mechanism of civil liabilities is to determine the subject of prosecution of civil liabilities, the way to realize civil liabilities, and the special hearing proceedings and authorities of the court. Taking steps to clarify and improve the prosecution mechanism of civil liabilities focusing on the subjects of prosecution (debtor’s senior managers) and authorities of the court, is the essence and systematic safeguard of realizing the civil liabilities regime of debtor’s senior managers in the Enterprise Bankruptcy Law. Gan Peizhong, Ph.D, is a professor of law and director of the Research Center for Enterprise and Company Law at Peking University. Prof. Gan is a recognized expert on economic law, company law, bankruptcy law and the reform of state-owned enterprises in China. He has released numerous articles on Chinese law journals and published many books. His major publications include Encyclopedia of Chinese Economic Law (vice editor-in-chief), New Studies on Economic Law (co-editor), New Studies on Enterprise Law (author), Studies on Chinese Economic Adjudication (editor-in-chief), Studies on Foreign Economic Law in Beijing (editor-in-chief), General Theories on Economic Law (co-editor), Legitimate Exercise of the Corporate Control Rights (author). Moreover, he was named the “leading young and middle-aged jurist” by Beijing Law Society in 1999. In addition, Prof. Gan is the deputy-president of the Securities Law Association, a member of the Standing Committee of the Economic Law Association under China Law Society. He also serves as the consultant of the Legislative Affairs Commission of the NPC Standing Committee and Beijing Municipal People’s Congress, as well as the Haidian District Court of Beijing.     

构建中国刑事被害人国家补偿制度之思考

The theory of recovering social justice, public remedy to rights, balance of interests and value of benefits are the basis for the establishment of state compensation system for victim of crimes, which is necessary and feasible in China. In accordance with the principles of obtaining justice and fair treatment, relying mainly on the offender’s compensation, supplemented by state compensation, state compensation with certain conditions, state compensation in due process, and the degree of compensation proportionate to the extent of damage, the related criminal legislation should provide the scope of subjects eligible for compensation, the object and limit of compensation, the competent agency of compensation, the procedure of compensation and so on. Sun Qian, professor and tutor of doctorate candidates, is presently a deputy prosecutor-general of the Supreme Procuratorate with the title of Grand Prosecutor of China. He once held posts as director of former Prosecutor-General’s Secretariat, deputy director-general of the Criminal Prosecution Department, president of the National Prosecutors’ College, and chief prosecutor of Jiangxi Province. Prosecutor Sun, also vice president of China Law Society and vice president of China Society of Prosecutors, specializing in criminal system and criminal law, has released more than 100 theses in academic journals such as Journal of Law and China Legal Science and published more than 20 books as author or editor. In 2004, he was nominated as a member of the “First Group of National Talents Project in the 21^st Century” launched by seven central ministries of China. Moreover, Deputy Prosecutor-General Sun was once a representative of the 10^th National People’s Congress of China.     

中国行政执法困境的个案解读

Due to lack of effective, and adequate communication on the standpoint of the government and the attitudes of civil society in legislative process, this has led to tension between the government and the general public. Within the context of law enforcement, the government sticks to “problem-based strategies” and “campaign-based enforcement”, who believe in the power of coercive force. As a way out of the dilemma in law enforcement, it is required that in the process of rule-making, the government should communicate effectively with the civil society in the institutionalized system, focusing on learning, reflection, and strategic adjustment. Wang Xixin, Professor at Law School of Peking University. Since 1999, Prof. Wang is a working member of China Administrative Legislative Research Group an academic team advising China’s Legal Affairs Working Commission on administrative law reforms. Since 2001, he is a major drafter for China’s Administrative Procedure Act. Since 2002, he is a research consultant for the NPC Standing Committee General Office. Since 2003, he is a research fellow of the China Law Center of Yale Law School. Since 2005, he is a Vice-chairman of Beijing Administrative Law Society. In academia, Prof. Wang is focused on administrative procedure, public participation, rulemaking and comparative administrative studies, whose publications include books, such as “Administrative Procedure: A Theoretic and Institutional Inquiry” (Beijing, 2007) and “Public Participation and Administrative Process” (Beijing, 2007) and some 30 articles for journals published in China and America. Moreover, Prof. Wang often submits papers and gives lectures in academic forums, including Columbia Law School, Yale Law School, the Woodrow Wilson Center for Int’l Scholarship, and Carnige Endowment for Int’l Peace.     

关于完善中国缺陷产品召回制度的若干问题

Defective product recalling system is a new regime in modern civil law, characterized by its special functions to prevent and eliminate the harms concerning consumers’ body and property due to potential defects of products. In legal nature, it is necessary to define “recalling defective products” as the obligation rather than the liability of manufacturers or sellers, so as to encourage both manufacturers and sellers to take effective remedies immediately upon defective products. Product recalling is of two categories, i.e., active recalling and compulsory recalling, and the breach of such recalling obligation will lead to a series of legal liabilities. Considering the importance of the recalling system and the economic development of China, it is strongly proposed that China shall formulate the Law of Defective Product Recalling. Wang Liming, Ph.D of Law, is currently a vice president of Renmin University of China and dean of the Law School. Prof. WANG is also a member of the Law Committee of 10th and 11th National People’s Congress, vice president of China Law Society. Prof. WANG is a leading expert in the drafting and formulating important civil laws in China, such as the Law of Real Rights of PRC. His main research area is civil and commercial law. Quite a number of his monographs won national academic achievements award, including but not limited to Study on Civil Law Regime (Renmin University of China Press, 2008), Study on General Principles of Civil Law (Renmin University of China Press, 2003), Draft of Law of Real Rights and its Interpretation (China Legality Press, 2001), etc. He also has 100 or so articles published in law journals home and abroad.     

论中国和平发展与国际法的交互影响和作用

A peaceful and harmonious world is an important social basis for China’s peaceful development, and international law lays a legal foundation and guarantee for building such a world. In the “village of globe” with co-existence and economic globalization, international law provides China a peaceful development with legal certainty in external environment of peace and security, fair and equal international competitive order, and international cooperation; and on the other hand, it puts on an increasing legal restraint on the internal and external strategies of China’s peaceful development. At the same time, the peaceful development of China deems to make a great contribution to the world, which are the main subject of international law in peace and development, as well as to human rights, rule of law and democracy, which are the universal values pursued by international law. Zeng Lingliang, Ph.D of law, is presently a dean and professor in the Faculty of Law in University of Macau. He is an awardee of the Cheung Kong Scholars Award Program and Jean Monnet Chair of European Union Law in Wuhan University, and one of the first three individuals nominated by the China government on the list of panelists in the WTO. He has published many articles on WTO issues, EU law and international law, and his influenced monographs are European Communities and Modern International Law (1992) and its revised edition—European Union and Modern International Law (1994), Law of World Trade Organization (1996), International Law and China in the Early 21 ^st Century (2005) and the Essentials of EU Law—in the New Perspective of the Treaty on the Constitution for Europe (2007).     

罪刑法定视域中的刑法适用解释

The judicial interpretation of criminal law should be an application interpretation to individual cases that is guided by judges and participated by the prosecutor and the accused, for which the judicial judgment should be combined with the application of criminal law of specific cases, and the criminal precedents should be as a carrier. The Supreme People’s Court should change from the previous practices of issuing normative and abstract interpretation to the dual approaches of the interpretation of criminal law application through direct creation and indirect acknowledgement. Liang Genlin, Professor and Vice Dean of Law School of Peking University and as a visiting professor of University of Tuebingen (2001–2002). His main research focuses on criminal law and criminal policy, and his important publications include “On the Structure of Punishment”, “Liang Genlin’s Review on Criminal Policy, Volume I, Criminal Policy: Standpoint and Category”, “Liang Genlin’s Review on Criminal Policy, Volume II, the Arm of the Law: Expand and Limit”, “Liang Genlin’s Review on Criminal Policy, Volume III, Criminal Sanction: Manner and Choice”. Besides, he has also published over 40 discourses on criminal law and criminal policy since 1996.     

中国内地与香港诉讼离婚法律制度比较研究

香港在法律渊源上属于普通法系,现行法律主要沿用英国法律.其<婚姻诉讼条例>关于离婚法定理由、离婚条件、离婚限制、离婚的诉讼程序及法律效力等方面均与内地婚姻法有着很大区别.在香港回归祖国后,两地居民通婚的情形日渐趋多,由此带来的婚姻家庭纠纷也日益凸现,如何协调两地因法律规定的差异所生"司法冲突",是今后一段时间内两地法律界需认真探讨的问题.     

Legal countermeasures for domestic violence: From the perspective of family law in China

Domestic violence, as its great harm to family members and family relationship, is one of the important issues to be tackled by family law. In this regard, China’s Marriage Law mainly adopts non-litigation measures, including dissuasion and curb of perpetrators, mediation for the parties concerned and imposition of administrative punishment. From the legal techniques in family resource sharing, the diversity of interests within a family, the complexity of family relationships and the privacy of family determine the non-antagonistic, nonlinear and non-proactive measures for adjusting family relationship. Further, in the principle of “family priority based on personal independence” and with the prerequisites of the prevention framework set up in the Marriage Law, it is suggested to make restrictive provisions on parental rights in protecting the minors, fully utilize the current civil mediation system to settle family disputes, and set up a system of “personal protection and behavioral correction.”