阿普唑仑在家兔体内的分布研究

建立生物检材内阿普唑仑的薄层扫描定性定量检测方法，研究阿普唑仑在染毒家兔体内的分布情况。家兔按21mg/Kg剂量灌胃染毒后4h，其体内肝、脾、肾、肺、心、脑、血、胆汁和尿内阿普唑仑的浓度分别为19．6±6．1、3．3±0．5、3．5±0．3、0．4±0．1、0．4±0．1、1．6±1．8、4．0±1．3、20．4±8．5和8.6±2．4（ug／g或ug／ml）。阿普唑仑在染毒家兔体内的分布不均匀，血、胆汁和尿是阿普唑仑中毒死者毒物分析较好的检材。     

家兔玻璃体和脑脊液中异烟肼的高效液相色谱分析

目的　建立玻璃体和脑脊液中异烟肼的高效液相色谱分析方法。方法　以香草醛为衍生化试剂 ,经柱前衍生为异烟肼 -香草醛腙 ,直接对体液样品中的腙进行定性、定量分析 ,并以空白兔体液添加标准异烟肼对样品的前处理方法、仪器条件、线性范围、精密度、回收率进行全面考查后 ,测定急性染毒家兔玻璃体和脑脊液中的异烟肼浓度。结果　用上述方法分析兔玻璃体和脑脊液中异烟肼 ,其线性范围为 0 2～ 12 0 μg/ml,检测限 0 2 μg/ml,日内、日间精度均小于 4 9% ,回收率均在 97 1%以上。异烟肼在急性染毒家兔玻璃体中的浓度为 74 60± 7 40 μg/ml;脑脊液中为 88 95± 10 12 μg/ml。 结论　本文所建方法适用于异烟肼中毒者玻璃体和脑脊液中异烟肼的检测。     

尿中香豆素类抗凝血杀鼠剂的固相萃取-紫外导数光谱测定

尿中杀鼠灵、杀鼠迷、溴敌隆、大隆等4种杀鼠剂用GDX403大孔树脂吸附，二氯乙烷洗脱。通过洗脱液二阶导数光谱，测定杀鼠剂含量。4种杀鼠剂尿中回收率分别为96．3±4．1％、95．6±3．3％、　85．2±4．0％、77．5±3．6％（mean±S．D），检出限分别为0．6、0．6、1．0、1．0mg／L。适用于司法毒物分析。     

三种安定类药物在中毒家兔体内的分布研究

为探求安定类药物在急性中毒家兔体内的代谢分布，采用固相萃取法和HPLC同时测定氯硝安定、佳静安定和安定。家兔按一定剂量将三种药物同时灌胃造成急性中毒2小时，处死后测定血、胆汁、尿液及其它脏器的三种药物浓度。结果表明，氯硝安定在胆汁和尿中含量较高，为0．82μg／ml和0．68μg／ml，而佳静安定及安定在胆汁和肝中浓度高，分别为9．32μg／ml和13．81μg／g。提示三种药物在家兔体内分布既有相同点也有显著差别。因此，利用本方法既可同时测定三种不同药物，也可为法医检案中毒案例的最佳检材采取和毒物分析结果评价提供了科学依据。     

盐酸曲马多在大鼠体内的分布特点

目的观察盐酸曲马多在大鼠体内的分布及其特点。方法大鼠以3倍和6倍LD50228mg/kg剂量盐酸曲马多灌胃染毒致死,取材,薄层色谱法检测其心、肺、肝、脾、肾、大脑和血内盐酸曲马多的浓度。结果3倍LD50剂量组大鼠肾、肺、血、肝、大脑、脾和心组织盐酸曲马多的浓度分别为112±15、59±17、53±31、32±19.7、22±11.5、20±20、16.7±8.3μg/g或μg/ml;6倍LD50剂量组大鼠血、肺、肝、心、肾、大脑和脾中盐酸曲马多的浓度分别为107.6±7.2、26.3±20、11.7±6.6、11.2±7.2、10.3±3.6、6.38±0.2、6.1±0.3μg/g或μg/ml。结论3倍LD50剂量组大鼠,肾、肺、血内盐酸曲马多浓度最高;6倍LD50剂量组大鼠血、肺、肝中盐酸曲马多的浓度最高。盐酸曲马多中毒时,血、肝、肺和肾可以作为法医毒物分析的检材。     

甲氰菊酯在家兔体内的死后分布研究

目的建立甲氰菊酯家兔灌胃染毒致死模型和生物检材中甲氰菊酯的气相色谱和气相色谱-质谱联用检测方法,研究甲氰菊酯在家兔体内的死后分布规律。方法家兔6只,甲氰菊酯经口灌胃染毒,死亡后迅速解剖,取心血、外周血、肝等组织,气相色谱和气相色谱-质谱联用法检测甲氰菊酯含量;部分组织经甲醛固定,HE染色,光镜观察其病理改变。结果家兔染毒后2～3h出现中毒表现,染毒后4.5～8h死亡。气相色谱和气相色谱-质谱联用法均检测到甲氰菊酯。甲氰菊酯在家兔体内死后分布为胃壁（458.92±32.82）μg/g、肾（46.47±6.30）μg/g、肝（35.79±20.11）μg/g、大脑（28.77±10.52）μg/g、心（26.49±4.10）μg/g、脾（22.23±5.37）μg/g、胆汁（10.87±1.42）μg/mL、肺（10.32±0.78）μg/g、周围血（8.14±1.12）μg/mL和心血（8.20±1.83）μg/mL。结论甲氰菊酯的灌胃染毒致死模型、气相色谱和气相色谱-质谱联用检测方法及死后分布规律可应用于甲氰菊酯中毒死亡案件的法医学鉴定及法医毒物动力学研究。     

生物试样中巴比妥类药物固相提取柱上衍生化GC/MS分析

建立生物试样中常见巴比妥类药物的固相提取和柱上衍生化GC／MS分析法。将预制的血或肝分别在pH6．0和pH2.2的条件下过预活化的GDX－403吸附小柱，再用缓冲浪和蒸馏水各4ml顺序洗柱。最后用4ml丙酮／氯仿（1：1）溶剂洗脱样品，离心弃除水相，80℃挥至近干，用50μl乙醇定溶、取净化的样品2～4μl挥至近干，加20μl0．2molTMAH衍生化试剂，直接进样0.5μl，柱上衍生化GC／MS（GC）分析。在试验条件下，当血和肝分别添加2．0μg和5．0μg混合药物，回收率≥80％，相对标准差（RSD）优于±10％，检测限优于5ng（信／噪比≥2）。该法能有效地排除类脂物和组胺的干扰，可用于治疗量级药物分析和婴幼儿中毒案检验。     

血中苯酚及甲酚的固相萃取-GC/MS分析

用固相萃取－GC／MS对人血中的酚和甲酚进行定性和定量分析。采用GDX403对分析物和邻氯酚（内标）进行固相萃取，并采集总离子流色谱。根据分析物在血中的浓度，通过总离子流色谱峰的质谱和保留时间或特征离子质量色谱峰保留时间进行定性分析。实验采用特征离子质量色谱进行定量分析，线性范围0．02～10μg／ml。本方法检测限为10ng／ml，CV％为2.11～4.20％，分析物和内标的萃取率为68．6～89．5％，血中添加测定回收率为97．8～104％。本法测定健康人血中苯酚含量为2．2±0．4μg／ml．     

生物组织检材内异烟肼的薄层色谱扫描检测研究──附1例异烟肼中毒死亡者体内分布报告

改进血清中异烟肼的提取方法，建立了生物组织检材内异胭肼的提取和薄层色谱扫描检测方法，线性范围为2～32ug／ml或g，检出限为0．5ug／ml或g。l例异烟擀中毒死亡者体内异烟肼分布：肾31．6mg／100g、肝26．6mg／100g、脾22．1mg／100g、心21．3mg／100g、胃16．6mg／100g、脑15．5mg／100m、肺12．6mm／100g、小脑11．7mm／100g和10.5mm／100ml。     

氯氮平在家兔体内死后再分布规律研究

目的阐明死后48h内家兔体内氯氮平再分布规律,为相关法医鉴定工作提供借鉴。方法取家兔15只,随机分为5组,以氯氮平灌胃,分别于死后0、6、12、24、48h取心血、外周静脉血、尿液、肝组织检测氯氮平浓度。结果家兔死亡后心血、外周静脉血、肝脏氯氮平浓度不断升高,尿液氯氮平浓度不断降低;死后早期浓度变化率大于晚期浓度变化率。死后48h心血、外周静脉血、肝脏、尿液氯氮平浓度分别为死后0h各检材氯氮平浓度的418%、193%、154%和29%。结论死亡一段时间后,提取生物检材,检测出的氯氮平浓度并不能准确反映刚死时的实际浓度。     

Bhartṛhari and Maṇḍana on Avidyā

The concept of avidyā is one of the central categories in the Advaita of Śaṇkara and Maṇḍana. Shifting the focus from māyā, interpreted either as illusion or as the divine power, this concept brings ignorance to the forefront in describing duality and bondage. Although all Advaitins accept avidyā as a category, its scope and nature is interpreted in multiple ways. Key elements in Maṇḍana’s philosophy include the plurality of avidyā, individual selves as its substrate and the Brahman as its field (viṣaya), and the distinction in avidyā between non-apprehension and misapprehension. A closer investigation shows that Maṇḍana is directly influenced by Bhartṛhari’s linguistic non-dualism in developing the concept of avidyā. This study also compares other key constituents such as vivartta and pariṇāma that are relevant to the analysis of avidyā. As the concept of counter-image (pratibimba) emerges as a distinct stream of Advaita subsequent to Maṇḍana, this study also compares the application of pratibimba in the writings of Bhartṛhari and Maṇḍana.     

Immigration,intermarriage and the changing face of Europe in the post war period

In this article we compare the propensity to intermarry of various migrant groups and their children who settled in Germany, France, England, Belgium and the Netherlands in the post-war period, using a wide range of available statistical data. We try to explain different intermarriage patterns within the framework of Alba and Nee's assimilation theory and pay special attention to the role of religion, colour and colonial background. We therefore compare colonial with non colonial migrants and within these categories between groups with ‘European’ (Christian) and non-European (Islam, Hinduism) religions. First of all, religion appears to be an important variable. Migrants whose faith has no tradition in Western Europe intermarry at a much lower rate than those whose religious backgrounds correspond with those that are common in the country of settlement. The rate of ethnic endogamous marriages in Western Europe are highest in Hindu and Muslim communities, often regardless if they came as guest workers or colonial migrants. Whereas differences in religion diminish the propensity to intermarry, colour or ‘racial’ differences on the other hand seem to be less important. This is largely explained by the pre-migration socialisation. Furthermore, the paper argues that the attention to institutions, as rightly advocated by Richard Alba and Victor Nee, needs a more refined and layered elaboration. Institutions, often as barriers to intermarriage, do not only emanate from the receiving society, but also—be it less formalized—within migrant communities. Especially religions and family systems, but also organized nationalist feelings, can have a profound influence on how migrants think about endogamy. Finally, strong pressures to assimilate, often through institutionalized forms of discrimination and stigmatization, not only produce isolation and frustrate assimilation (with resulting low intermarriage rates), but can also stimulate assimilation by 'passing' mechanisms. These factors, together with a more comparative perspective, are not completely ignored in the new assimilation theory, but—as this study of Western European intermarriage patterns stresses—deserve to be included more systematically in historical and social scientist analyses.     

Unraveling the <Emphasis Type="Italic">Kāvyaprakāśa</Emphasis>: Jayadeva Pīyūṣavarṣa’s idiosyncratic sequence of topics in the <Emphasis Type="Italic">Candrāloka</Emphasis>

In his twelfth century alaṃkāraśāstra, the Candrāloka, Jayadeva Pīyūṣavarṣa reverses the sequence of topics found in Mammaṭa’s Kāvyapr-akāśa, an earlier and immensely popular work. With such a structural revisionism, Jayadeva asserts the autonomy of his own work and puts forth an ambitious critique of earlier approaches to literary analysis. Jayadeva investigates the technical and aesthetic components of poetry in the first part of the Candrāloka, prior to his formal semantic investigations in the latter half of the text, thus suggesting that aesthetic evaluations of poetry beneficially inform scientific investigations of language. Jayadeva’s organization of his chapters on the semantic operations, moreover, intimates that the study of suggestive and metaphoric functions of language clarifies our understanding of denotation, which is conventionally understood to be the primary and direct path of verbal designation.     

Turning a Madhyamaka Trick: Reply to Huntington

Huntington (2007); argues that recent commentators (Robinson, 1957; Hayes, 1994; Tillemans, 1999; Garfield and Priest, 2002) err in attributing to Nāgārjuna and Candrakīrti a commitment to rationality and to the use of argument, and that these commentators do violence to the Madhyamaka project by using rational reconstruction in their interpretation of Nāgārjuna’s and Candrakīrti’s texts. Huntington argues instead that mādhyamikas reject reasoning, distrust logic and do not offer arguments. He also argues that interpreters ought to recuse themselves from argument in order to be faithful to these texts. I demonstrate that he is wrong in all respects: Nāgārjuna and Candrakīrti deploy arguments, take themselves to do so, and even if they did not, we would be wise to do so in commenting on their texts.     

Illumination,Imagination, Creativity: Rājaśekhara,Kuntaka, and Jagannātha on <Emphasis Type="Italic">Pratibhā</Emphasis>

Sanskrit poeticians make the visionary faculty of pratibhā a necessary part of the professional poet’s make-up. The term has a pre-history in Bhartṛhari’s linguistic metaphysics, where it is used to explain the unitary perception of meaning. This essay examines the relation between pratibhā and possible theories of the imagination, with a focus on three unusual theoreticians—Rājaśekhara, Kuntaka, and Jagannātha Paṇḍita. Rājaśekhara offers an analysis of pratibhā that is heavily interactive, requiring the discerning presence of the bhāvaka listener or critic; he also positions pratibhā in relation to Bildung (vyutpatti) and practice. For Kuntaka, pratibhā, never an ex nihilo creation by a poet, serves as the basis for the peculiar forms of intensified insight and experience that constitute poetry; these may also involve the creative scrambling and re-articulation of the object in terms of its systemic composition. At times, Kuntaka’s pratibhā comes close to a strong notion of imaginative process. But the full-fledged thematization of the imagination, and of pratibhā as its support and mechanism, is best seen in the seventeenth-century debates preserved for us by Jagannātha. A link is suggested between the discourse of poetic imagination in Jagannātha and similar themes that turn up in Indo-Persian poets such as Bedil.     

Preventing Homelessness for System‐Involved Youth

Too many youth and young adults find themselves on the streets, couch‐surfing with friends, in emergency shelters or worse, after exiting the child welfare and juvenile justice systems. In some circumstances, youth have had court hearings until their exit from the legal system, but those hearings have not focused on long‐range plans of youth and emergencies youth may encounter. In other circumstances, there has been little or no planning prior to discharge, especially for young people who leave the juvenile justice system. Courts can and should prevent, alleviate or end youth homelessness for youth who appear before them through strategies that are enumerated in the recently‐passed NCJFCJ resolution. This article expounds on three of these strategies – coordinating transition and re‐entry plans, insisting on effective legal representation of youth, and utilizing sound judicial leadership. It also describes the concurrent efforts of the Coalition for Juvenile Justice and the American Bar Association's Homeless Youth Legal Network to remove legal barriers and improve outcomes for youth and young adults experiencing homelessness.     

Best practices for structuring a family court parenting plan evaluation under the 2022 AFCC Guidelines

Evaluation appointment orders provide enforceable scaffolding for conduct of family court parenting plan evaluations, and use of the evaluator's reports, feedback, file, and testimony. Unlike a contract, a stipulated or adjudicated appointment order is directly enforceable by the family court. It unambiguously positions the evaluator as the family court's appointee – answerable directly to the court and, in some jurisdictions, protected by quasi-judicial immunity from damages claims. A well-crafted appointment order governs the roles and expectations of the court, the evaluator, the parties, the lawyers, and the collateral witnesses. An appointment order mandates the legal duties, rights, powers, and responsibilities of the professionals, the parties, and the collateral witnesses. At minimum, an appointment order articulates the legal basis for the appointment, the purpose and scope of the evaluation, compensation of evaluator, and the duty of the parties to participate in the process. A written evaluation protocol or procedures statement discloses in advance the methods of investigation and assessment that the evaluator intends to use. Together, the appointment order and written protocol help the evaluator, lawyers, parents, and judge manage the complexity of the evaluation process.     

The Supreme Array Scripture: A New Interpretation of the Title “Gaṇḍavyūha-sūtra”

This article argues for a new interpretation of the Sanskrit compound gaṇḍa-vyūha as it is used in the common title of the Mahāyāna text the Gaṇḍavyūha-Sūtra.The author begins by providing a brief history of the sūtra’s appellations in Chinese and Tibetan sources. Next, the meanings of gaṇḍa (the problematic member of the compound) are explored. The author proposes that contemporary scholars have overlooked a meaning of gaṇḍa occurring in some compounds, wherein gaṇḍa can mean simply “great,” “big” or “massive.” This general sense is particularly common in the compound gaṇda-śaila (a “massive rock” or “boulder”) and is found in such texts as the Bhāgavata Purāṇa, the Harivaṃśa and the Harṣacarita. Following the discussion of Gaṇḍa, the author examines the term vyūha (“array”) as it is used in the Gaṇḍavyūha-sūtra. The article concludes with the suggestion that a more appropriate translation of the Gaṇḍavyūha-sūtra would be “The Supreme array Scripture.”     

The Mūlāvidyā Controversy Among Advaita Vedāntins: was Śaṅkara Himself Responsible?

The concept of avidyā or ignorance is central to the Advaita Vedāntic position of Śȧnkara. The post-Śaṅkara Advaitins wrote sub-commentaries on the original texts of Śaṅkara with the intention of strengthening his views. Over the passage of time the views of these sub-commentators of Śaṅkara came to be regarded as representing the doctrine of Advaita particularly with regard to the concept of avidyā. Swami Satchidanandendra Saraswati, a scholar-monk of Holenarsipur, challenged the accepted tradition through the publication of his work Mūlāvidyānirāsaḥ, particularly with regard to the avidyādoctrine. It was his contention that the post-Śaṅkara commentators brought their own innovations particularly on the nature of avidyā. This was the idea of mūlāvidyā or ‘root ignorance’, a positive entity which is the material cause of the phenomenal world. Saraswati argues that such an idea of mūlāvidyā is not to be found in the bhāṣyas (commentaries) of Śaṅkara and is foisted upon Śaṅkara. This paper attempts to show that although Śaṅkara may not have explicitly favoured such a view of mūlāvidyā, his lack of clarity on the nature of avidyā left enough scope for the post-Śaṅkara commentators to take such a position on avidyā.     

Evaluation of six presumptive tests for blood, their specificity, sensitivity, and effect on high molecular-weight DNA

Luminol, leuchomalachite green, phenolphthalein, Hemastix, Hemident, and Bluestar are all used as presumptive tests for blood. In this study, the tests were subjected to dilute blood (from 1:10,000 to 1:10,000,000), many common household substance, and chemicals. Samples were tested for DNA to determine whether the presumptive tests damaged or destroyed DNA. The DNA loci tested were D2S1338 and D19S433. Leuchomalachite green had a sensitivity of 1:10,000, while the remaining tests were able to detect blood to a dilution of 1:100,000. Substances tested include saliva, semen, potato, tomato, tomato sauce, tomato sauce with meat, red onion, red kidney bean, horseradish, 0.1 M ascorbic acid, 5% bleach, 10% cupric sulfate, 10% ferric sulfate, and 10% nickel chloride. Of all the substances tested, not one of the household items reacted with every test; however, the chemicals did. DNA was recovered and amplified from luminol, phenolphthalein, Hemastix, and Bluestar, but not from leuchomalachite green or Hemident.