欠修理费能扣押被修理物品吗

我的维修部为王某修理了两台笔记本电脑。王某来取电脑时称手头紧,只交了一半的修理费要把两台电脑都取走。我做的是小本生意,怕要不回修理费,就扣下了他的一台笔记本电脑。王某说我无权这样做。请问我可以扣押他的电脑吗？ 杨法官：我国法律明确规定,债务人不履行债务时,债权人可以留置标的物,拒绝债务人交付标的物的请求。从你的叙述来看,你的做法无可非议。     

代位诉讼程序问题的探讨

我国《合同法》第７３条规定：“国债务人怠于行使其到期债权,对责权人造成损害,债权人可以向人民法院请求以自己的名义代位行使债务人的债权,但该债权专属于债务人自身的除外。代位权的行使范围以债权人的债权为限。债权人行使代位权的必要费用,田债务人员担。”该法条首次将代位诉讼以法律的形式明示规定了其构成要件以及适用的范围。但是,在具体实践中如何操作,尚存在一些争议。笔者试就代位权的行使及相关的程序问题,结合有关的法学理论,从诉讼角度,作如下探讨。在代位诉讼中,债权人行使代位权时是原告（代位人）,是代债务人…     

论债权质权中第三债务人的保护

文章以债权质权性质的确定为前提 ,以债权质权中第三债务人的存在为基础 ,针对我国法理与立法上忽略对债权质权中第三债务人保护的现状 ,以主要大陆法系国家立法为例 ,对我国立法进行了检讨。认为应在借鉴其他国家立法的基础上 ,对我国现行权利质权中的规定加以完善补充 ,使之适应经济生活的需要。     

浅析负债经营的利与弊

随着人类步入知识经济时代,以资本和技术为主导的世界经济结构调整,使各国经济的发展成为全球竞争的焦点,伴随着我国具有中国特色的社会主义市场经济的建设特别是中国成功地加入了WTO,中国经济融入国际经济一体化的进程也在逐渐加快,各跨国公司国际投资引起的国际资本流动以及国际资本市场的不断扩大,与之相配套的经营活动也显得日益重要,而作为国际国内最常见的经营形式之一--"负债经营"战略也被企业广泛采纳和成功运用,它的优势与不足及其应对策略同时也逐渐被企业熟悉掌握和成功运用.研究负债经营,提高负债经营成功率,是企业面临的一项重要课题.本文试就负债经营相关的问题作一简要分析研究.     

论我国的破产和解制度

破产和解制度是现代破产法律体系中不可缺少的组成部分,对于即将破产的企业具有重要的挽救作用.<中华人民共和国破产法>以专章的形式对和解制度作了规定,但还存在法院外和解的司法认定、和解的监督、和解申请等方面的问题.我国应根据国情,借鉴国外关于破产和解制度的立法,进一步完善我国的破产和解制度.     

债务人迟延催告要件的制度功能与体系定位

若债务人迟延以催告为要件,则仍有必要区分不同的违约形态,催告要件因而具有违约责任体系建构的意义。《民法典》第511条第4项在文义上存在“自动到期+无需催告”“催告到期”“自动到期+催告迟延”等多种解释可能。认为不采催告要件可以督促债务人主动履行、遏制“支付道德恶化”现象的新近有力观点有违《民法典》第511条第4项的立法原意;此外,舍弃催告要件意义微弱,“支付道德恶化”现象的成因在于公共机构和大型企业的市场垄断地位,需要通过转变损害填平思维、加大制裁力度、降低程序成本等手段解决。坚持催告要件具有两重实质正当性：其一,如无特别情事,当事人未约定履行期时,大多期待由债权人根据自己的需求情况嗣后指定履行期,催告到期规则构成当事人的应有合意;其二,当个案情事表明当事人期待从速履行时,催告要件能够缓和债务人迟延法的制裁性后果,更加符合比例原则。对催告与债务到期的关系也应针对上述两种情形分别讨论。     

论债权让与和对抗要件

债权让与若要拘束债务人及其他第三人,必须符合法定要件.在对抗债务人的问题上,我国民法以让与通知为要件,但在日本民法上,除此之外还承认债务人承诺发生对抗效力.我国民法可以借鉴.日本民法另外规定了对抗债务人以外的第三人的要件,以解决债权无公示性的问题,我国民法也可借鉴.当然,对日本民法存在的问题,我们须有清醒的认识.     

离婚协议中第三人利益条款法律效力研究

离婚协议是因当事人之间身份关系的变化而引起,当事人在协议财产分割、平衡双方利益的过程中,必然会关注其子女的利益。实践中的离婚协议在约定承担子女抚养费条款之外,普遍存在将夫妻共同财产分割给子女或对子女给付一定财物等条款。这些条款为离婚协议相对方之外的第三人设定了利益,对于这些第三人利益条款的合法性、第三人直接请求权的享有、当事人变更、撤     

论破产法上债务人高管人员民事责任的追究

The Enterprise Bankruptcy Law has designed the regime for debtor’s senior managers to bear civil liabilities, while the framework design concerning the prosecution mechanism of civil liabilities is still unclear. How to establish a prosecution mechanism of civil liabilities of debtor’s senior managers in line with the purposes of the bankruptcy regime is a substantial issue during the implementation of Enterprise Bankruptcy Law. The realization of the civil liabilities regime of debtor’s senior managers depends on the establishment and operation of a relatively well-developed prosecution mechanism of civil liabilities. The focus of the prosecution mechanism of civil liabilities is to determine the subject of prosecution of civil liabilities, the way to realize civil liabilities, and the special hearing proceedings and authorities of the court. Taking steps to clarify and improve the prosecution mechanism of civil liabilities focusing on the subjects of prosecution (debtor’s senior managers) and authorities of the court, is the essence and systematic safeguard of realizing the civil liabilities regime of debtor’s senior managers in the Enterprise Bankruptcy Law. Gan Peizhong, Ph.D, is a professor of law and director of the Research Center for Enterprise and Company Law at Peking University. Prof. Gan is a recognized expert on economic law, company law, bankruptcy law and the reform of state-owned enterprises in China. He has released numerous articles on Chinese law journals and published many books. His major publications include Encyclopedia of Chinese Economic Law (vice editor-in-chief), New Studies on Economic Law (co-editor), New Studies on Enterprise Law (author), Studies on Chinese Economic Adjudication (editor-in-chief), Studies on Foreign Economic Law in Beijing (editor-in-chief), General Theories on Economic Law (co-editor), Legitimate Exercise of the Corporate Control Rights (author). Moreover, he was named the “leading young and middle-aged jurist” by Beijing Law Society in 1999. In addition, Prof. Gan is the deputy-president of the Securities Law Association, a member of the Standing Committee of the Economic Law Association under China Law Society. He also serves as the consultant of the Legislative Affairs Commission of the NPC Standing Committee and Beijing Municipal People’s Congress, as well as the Haidian District Court of Beijing.