恶意透支型信用卡诈骗罪相关问题研究

信用卡诈骗罪逐渐成为高发的金融犯罪。建议根据登记持卡人和实际持卡人不一致的具体情况,确定恶意透支信用卡诈骗罪主体,谨慎推定持卡的人非法占有的目的,区分恶意透支和善意透支,统一对催收要件行为认定和时间计算的认识,完善对恶意透支信用卡诈骗罪的法律规制。     

论金融诈骗罪的非法占有目的

金融诈骗罪不仅破坏国家金融管理秩序 ,而且侵犯财产所有权。“非法占有目的”是所有金融诈骗罪必备的主观要件 ,而不是选择要件。对于金融诈骗罪这种目的犯而言 ,非法占有目的的有无 ,直接决定行为人是否构成犯罪以及构成何种犯罪。准确把握非法占有目的的涵义并适用司法推定理论才能够正确认定非法占有目的 ,从而有助于金融诈骗罪的认定和惩处     

Simplification： A single tax and a single entitlement

The United States is experiencing a very serious economic downturn. It is now necessary to consider some significant changes in government policy. The system of revenue collection should be simplified with a single tax levied and itemized at the national, state, and local levels. Likewise, the system of benefit distribution should be simplified with a single entitlement paid to each individual at every level with absolutely no strings attached. Such simplification would save a massive amount of time and money even if it was neutral in terms of overall revenue and expenditure. And, it would minimize fraud, waste and abuse. The gains in efficiency and accountability would be enormous.     

The industrial regulation： Experiences and lessons in China＇s telecommunication,electricity and public utilities

We trace the development of the regulatory policy in China＇s telecommunication, electricity and public utilities. We find that different characteristics of industry result in different policy evolution processes, different reform strength and methods, which lead to different effects. Some industries have just established the competitive structure, and some others have already formed sufficient competition. Reasons for these differences among industries include： regulatory promise, technical progress and substitutive competition. According to the analysis, the foundation of the regulatory system and the coordination of the regulators＇ behavior can improve the industrial regulation in China.     

论我国《消费者权益保护法》中的惩罚性赔偿

我国在1994年开始实施的《中华人民共和国消费者权益保护法》中规定了惩罚性损害赔偿制度,该制度具有惩罚经营者的欺诈行为和激励消费者维权的功能。但在司法实践中围绕该制度的适用却出现了问题,主要表现为知假买假者能否要求惩罚性赔偿,对适用惩罚性赔偿的条件———“欺诈”应如何理解以及惩罚性赔偿的数额等问题。认可知假买假者的消费者身份,对“欺诈”作有别于《民法通则》与《合同法》中的解释以及重新确定惩罚性赔偿的额度将有助于发挥惩罚性赔偿制度的功能。