日美贸易摩擦中三大谈判机制的对比研究

"市场导向的个别领域谈判"、"日美结构性障碍协议"、"日美经济框架对话"是战后日美双方缓解贸易摩擦的三大谈判机制。对三大谈判机制及其各自内部子议题的对比研究发现,贸易谈判中外压强度和谈判有效性之间并不存在对称关系。在这些谈判机制中,美国对日外压与日本国内的内压之间形成了动态的双层博弈。内压的结构与价值诉求、利益指向是分析贸易谈判的重要变量。     

国际公共安全评价体系：理论与应用前景

在典型的国际公共安全评估框架中,存在能力和脆弱性评价2个构面。2者的评价指标关系互相补充,分别承担识别易致风险因素和衡量对抗危机弹力的评价任务。基于能力与脆弱性评价取向的国际公共安全评价模式,在评价目标、评估水平、评价指标与模型、统计数据源的设计上,同一般模式有所区别。根据能力与脆弱性评价理论模式,建立中国区域安全评价模型,显示了该理论的应用技术价值。     

我国气候变化立法的缺陷及其对策分析

我国气候变化立法存在着一些较为明显的缺陷,这在一定程度上制约着我国温室气体排放控制战略的实施。目前,气候变化问题已经成为威胁人类生存和发展的一大国际环境问题。温室气体的排放控制战略是《气候变化框架公约》所确立的应对气候变化问题的根本举措。我国应当按照《气候变化框架公约》和《京都议定书》的法律要求,健全和完善气候变化立法以进一步控制温室气体的排放量,从而为全球气候变化问题的应对做出更大的贡献。     

Setting Standards for Children

In September 2004, the publication of a National Service Framework (NSF) for children set standards for what children and their families, young people, and expectant mothers can expect from the National Health Service. This article describes some of what the NSF includes, and why it is important.     

仲裁协议效力扩张若干问题研究

近年来,仲裁在民商事争端解决中的地位得以不断提升,可仲裁事项、仲裁主体范围等仍在不断扩大。一个突出表现为仲裁协议的效力在特定情况下,可以向非书面签约第三人延伸。这是一个在仲裁制度发展中重要而复杂的新课题,需要从理论上进行探讨和阐释。本文对仲裁协议效力扩张的情形进行归纳和总结,着重介绍仲裁协议效力扩张的法理基础和政策考虑,对仲裁协议效力扩张所面临的法律障碍进行了分析。     

The UK's Prudential Borrowing Framework: Professional Discipline and Control

Since 2004, governance and accountability arrangements for UK local government borrowing under the new Prudential Borrowing Framework (PBF) have been based on the professional discipline and control model of governance. It supplements the earlier centralised discipline and control model whereby municipal borrowing had to be specifically approved by central government and provides an alternative to Private Finance Initiatives (PFIs) and Public-Private Partnerships (PPPs) for capital procurement. Incorporating a case study of the use of PBF by Glasgow City Council, this paper considers the strengths and weaknesses of the PBF as a control mechanism for borrowing.     

“多源流框架”对中国政策过程的解释力——以江浙跨行政区水污染防治合作的政策过程为例

"多源流框架"作为西方公共政策过程分析中应用较为广泛的工具,对我国公共政策过程分析的解释力如何?通过跨行政区水污染矛盾比较突出、水污染防治合作具代表性的江浙边界为例,选取1993-2005年间较为典型的13次水污染事件,采用"多源流框架"为理论工具对事件的规律性进行归类梳理,分析江浙两省在跨行政区水污染防治合作中的政策过程.主要观点是:"多源流框架"在解释江浙边界跨行政区水污染防治合作的政策演变过程中具有一定适用性:"政策之窗"的打开,是问题、政策、政治三源流共同出现的结果;"政策之窗"未形成,是由于三源流中某一条或两条源流的缺失.同时,该理论在解释我国政策演变过程中,其解释力具有一定局限性:三源流并非彼此独立,各源流的出现存在一定先后顺序.因此,在使用"多源流框架"分析我国政策过程时,必须与政治体制、管理体制等特点相结合,才能更科学地分析我国公共管理过程中的政策问题.     

Policy Stalemate and Policy Change in Israel's Water Sector 1970–2010: Advocacy Coalitions and Policy Narratives

This paper seeks to explain policy stalemates that persist despite recognition of their risks and damages, as well as the factors and processes that enable a breakthrough and lead to policy change. The paper seeks to fill a gap in the Advocacy Coalition Framework (ACF) theory by supplementing it with Narrative Analysis (NA). We claim that NA provides a link missing in the ACF that is required for the transformation of “necessary” conditions—like external and internal shocks to the system—into “sufficient” conditions for policy persistence or change. We use the ACF to delineate coalition members and their belief systems and policy positions, as well as external, internal, and structural shocks to the system. We rely on NA to analyze the narratives employed in the public arena, which turn conditions necessary both for hurting stalemates and for policy change into sufficient conditions. We illustrate the benefits of combining the two approaches through a study of Israel's water policy during four decades (1970s–2000s) based on government records and on information from interviews with key players.     

基于ASP.NET的网络课程体系结构和技术研究

本文介绍了ASP.NET的运行机制及其优点,通过阐述现有网络课程的特点和不足,结合ASP.NET先进的动态网页开发技术,提出了基于ASP.NET的网络课程设计架构,并对网络课程功能模块和开发过程中的关键技术进行了详细的分析。     

Japanese civil society in global governance: the case of 2015 UN World Conference on disaster risk reduction

In 2015, the Hyogo Framework for Action on disaster risk reduction (DRR) expired, necessitating the introduction of a new international agreement. This article investigates the activities and achievements of the Japan civil society organization coalition for the 2015 UN World Conference on DRR (JCC2015) from the point of view of its involvement in the shaping of the new Sendai Framework for DRR. Although JCC2015 contributed to agenda setting and policy development processes and managed to secure recognition for its position on nuclear risk at a regional level, its participation did not translate into impact on the Sendai Framework to the extent it wished to achieve. The article’s findings testify to the on-going and active inclusion of non-governmental stakeholders in the UN-led global policy-making processes concerning reducing disaster risk, but they also illustrate difficulties that actors who aim to introduce new elements into the agenda need to tackle.