排除危险状态行为之认定

在危险犯中,行为人制造了危险状态后又主动排除危险状态,从而防止实害结果发生的,刑法理论与实务通常认为不值得动用刑罚处罚.因此,不少学者认为,危险犯的既遂标志应当是实害结果的出现,或者认为只要在实害结果出现之前中止犯罪行为的,就应当认为成立中止犯.基于此,承认危险状态是危险犯既遂标志的学者陷入了一种困境:不能认定为是犯罪中止,如何对行为人免除处罚.制造危险状态后又排除危险状态的,并非一定得免除处罚;即使对之免除处罚,也并非以成立犯罪中止为前提,我国及国外的相关立法例都说明了这一点.     

极穷权边界的限定性研究——以一则震区哄抢事件为例说明

震区哄抢事件引发了公众对于灾民哄抢行为罪与非罪界定的讨论,紧急避险和权利冲突理论告诉我们极穷状态下的哄抢行为并非犯罪,因为此时对生命的尊重与保障处于最为优先的地位,而划清罪与非罪界限的关键节点则在于对极穷权的边界进行限定。     

行政相对人的行政受益权法治化探析

行政相对人针对行政主体的行政受益权是公民权利体系中的一项重要内容。在现代福利国家服务行政理念下,行政主体保障该权利的实现成为一种法律上的义务,实现了重要的法治观念的转变。我国对行政相对人的行政受益权的保护还存在一些不足,需要进一步的完善。     

公共财政立法研究

文章以我国财政体制改革为背景,结合公共财政体制建设,就公共财政的基本内容、公共财政的特点和职能、公共财政的法律特征和立法框架进行了探讨。文章指出国家财政体制改革的目标是公共财政和国家财政的统一,只有把公共财政和国家财政结合与统一起来,而不是将两者矛盾或对立起来,才是具有中国特色的公共财政。     

家法族规在明清法律体系中的地位

就宗族法的发展历史看,明清时期准立法、准司法性质的家法族规为中国封建时代的典型。本文以明清家法族规的内容及其与国家法的互动、冲突关系为视角,探讨了家法族规在封建社会中的重要地位。     

Ideology and Polarization Among Women State Legislators

In early work on women in Congress, scholars consistently identified a tendency among women legislators to be more liberal roll‐call voters than male copartisans. Recent changes in Congress point to the polarization of women, where Democratic women remain more liberal than Democratic men but Republican women are no different from, or more conservative than, Republican men. We use newly available state legislative roll‐call data to determine whether women state legislators are more liberal or polarized than male copartisans. We find that while Democratic women state legislators remain consistently more liberal than male copartisans in most state chambers, Republican women legislators are growing more conservative. Thus, women state legislators are increasingly polarized in most U.S. states. Legislator replacement and increasing polarization among state legislators in office contribute to this effect. We argue that polarization among women legislators has implications for the representation of women in the states.     

Creating a State‐Academic Partnership to Advance a Forensic Teaching Service: Benefits and Barriers

In Washington State, like many states, there is a shortage of forensically trained mental health clinicians to work with criminal justice‐involved individuals. At the direction of the state legislature, a collaborative project was undertaken by the University of Washington, the state Department of Social and Health Services, and a state psychiatric hospital to develop a proposal for a jointly sponsored forensic teaching service. The authors reviewed the literature, surveyed and interviewed forensic psychiatry and psychology training directors, and conducted site visits of selected training programs that offer multidisciplinary training or have affiliations with state hospitals. The authors conducted focus groups of additional stakeholders, including clinicians and patients in forensic settings, to better understand the needs in Washington. The authors report on several common benefits and barriers to establishing forensic teaching services. Other states and forensic programs may find this article useful in identifying common considerations for forensic mental health teaching services.     

公证债权文书执行审查程序与破产债权确认之诉的交错与区隔 ——以重庆莱卡斯贸易有限公司破产债权确认纠纷案为视角

具有强制执行效力的公证书确认的债权进入执行程序后,债务人进入破产清算的,围绕债权产生的争议,在规范层面上,存在着公证债权文书执行审查程序与破产债权确认之诉这两种不同的争议解决程序,然而这两种程序性质迥异,相互排斥、无法并行。为协调两种程序之间的关系,应当以裁定受理破产申请与裁定中止执行这两个时间节点为界,对这两种程序的适用范围进行区隔,分别确定两个程序的不同规制范围。     

《监察法》对中国特色反腐败工作的法治影响

《监察法》是反腐败立法,是一部对国家监察工作起统领性和基础性作用的法律,是借鉴古今中外先进经验、经过实践检验、与时俱进的重要制度创新。《监察法》的制定,进一步织密了中国特色反腐败法网,进一步完善了中国特色反腐败体制机制,标志着中国特色反腐败工作已经进入依法反腐和依宪反腐的新阶段,同时也给中国特色反腐败体制机制、新时代纪检监察执纪执法工作、纪检监察机关及其工作人员带来一系列新变化与新要求。     

试论诚实信用原则在公法域的适用

诚实信用原则本为一私法原则,但自20世纪30年代以来,该原则出现了从私法领域向公法领域扩展的现象。文章主要探讨诚信原则在公法领域适用的法理基础,以及从诚信原则本身的局限、诚信原则适用的特定语境和公法领域的特性出发,探讨该原则在公法领域适用的限制。