Assessing the results of public expenditure: program evaluation in the Canadian federal government

Abstract. In an attempt to tighten up its financial systems and improve control of expenditures, the Canadian federal government has set up a new office, that of the Comptroller General. One of this Office's responsibilities is to administer the Treasury Board's policy on program evaluation, which says that all government programs should be periodically reviewed for their effectiveness in meeting goals and for the efficiency with which they are managed. The paper describes the Office's approach to program evaluation, reviews program evaluation policy in three other countries and discusses the principles and practical problems which limit the application of evaluation research. Evaluation activity in Canada is endangered in its cradle by two threats: the tendency of proponents to over-exuberance; and the cynics' view that the activity is of such limited applicability that potential savings are negligible. A third problem is a tendency to fuse together policy-related and management-related assessment activity. Evaluation activity conducted from the operational management point of view which takes program goals for granted will surely result in sequences of small victories and economies. This is worth doing well. But the dramatic import of effectiveness evaluation as a ‘bottom line’ for judging the worth of whole programs — that is, as a policy tool — should not be allowed to generate false expectations about the scope for improvement in routine management of the public service. Sommaire. En vue de fortifier ses systèmes financiers et d'améliorer le contrôle exercé sur ses dépenses, le gouvemement fédéral canadien a créé un nouveau poste, celui du Contrôleur général. Une des responsabilités de cette function est d'administrer la politique du Conseil du trésor en matière d'évaluation de programmes. Cette politique exige que les programmes gouvernementaux soient évalués périodiquement afin de déterminer leur efficacitéà rencontrer leurs objectifs ainsi que la capacité de rendement de leur gestion. Ce document décrit l'approche du Bureau du Contrôleur général en matière d'évaluation de programmes; examine les politiques correspondantes dans trois autres pays; et discute des principes et des problèmes pratiques qui limitent l'applicabilité de l'évaluation en recherche.     

A simple checklist,that is all it takes: a cluster randomized controlled field trial on improving the treatment of suspected terrorists by the police

Journal of Experimental Criminology - When it comes to interviewing suspected terrorists, global evidence points to harsh interrogation procedures, despite the likelihood of false positives. How...     

How Ideology Fuels Affective Polarization

Scholars have reached mixed conclusions about the implications of increased political polarization for citizen decision-making. In this paper, we argue that citizens respond to ideological divergence with heightened affective polarization. Using a survey experiment conducted with a nationally representative sample of U.S. citizens, we find that increased ideological differences between political figures produce increasingly polarized affective evaluations, and that these differences are especially large among respondents with stronger ideological commitments and higher levels of political interest. We provide further support for these findings in an observational study of citizens’ evaluations of the U.S. Senators from their state. We also find that the polarizing effects of ideological differences can be largely mitigated with biographical information about the public officials, which suggests that the pernicious consequences of ideological polarization can be overcome by focusing on matters other than political disagreement.     

Introduction: Nation-building in China and Vietnam

This introduction explores the changing nature of Chinese and Vietnamese nation-building in the era of globalisation and specifically, transnationalism. The first part sets out a conceptual framework designed to put contemporary Chinese and Vietnamese nation-building in comparative, international perspective. The second part looks at the borders of nation-building from the point of view of diasporas living the nation-state, while the third part focuses on a series of trends working to reinterpret the nation from within.     

The politics of audit: the federal Office of the Auditor General in comparative perspective

Abstract: The Office of the Auditor General has continued to expand its functions since the legislation of 1977. In March 1985 it was in court against the Government of Canada, pressing a claim that the auditor general (AG) required all of cabinet's papers that may have touched on the acquisition by Petro Canada Limited of Petrofina Canada Inc., a subsidiary of the Belgian company Petrofina S.A., in order to complete his review of expenditures from the Canadian Ownership Account. The rationale presented was that the AG needed to see the whole picture of advice tendered to cabinet by officials in order to assess whether cabinet itself had done its homework before authorizing the deal, after which he could give cabinet a “report card.” The Federal Court Justice's Reason for Decision, released on November 1, initially seemed to give the AG even more than he had asked, while the eventual decision of December 6 reintroduced grave ambiguity. The argument of the paper is that the AG'S move into the advice stream, as opposed to the traditional duties of an auditor, constitutes his Office as a force in policy-making, a factor that cannot be reconciled with responsible and representative government. The article compares the OAGS legislation and operating mandate with those of provincial legislative auditors, and those of Great Britain, New Zealand and Australia. It concludes that the 1977 legislation should be rewritten so that the OAG would once more work from the base of a replicable, objective financial audit, reporting as broadly as it would wish. Sommaire: Le Bureau du Vérificateur général à continue a é largir ses fonctions depuis qu'il a obtenu la nouvelle lé gislation en 1977. En mars 1985, il faisait comparaître devant les tribunaux le gouvernement du Canada, dans le cadre d'un procès réclamant le droit d'accèb, par le Vérificateur général, à tous les documents du Conseil des ministres concernant l'acquisition, par Pétro-Canada Ltée, de la société Pétrofina Canada Inc., une succursale de la société belge Pétrofina S. A., afin de compléter l'exa-men, par le Vérificateur général, des dépenses effectuées a même le Compte de propriété canadienne. D'après l'argument présenté, le Vérificateur général (VG) devait être au courant de tous les conseils fournis par les fonctionnaires au Conseil des ministres, afin que le VG puisse décider si le Conseil lui-même avait bien fait son travail avant d'autoriser le rachat, après quoi le Vérificateur général serait à même d'évaluer les gestes posés par le Conseil. Les raisons de la décision du juge de la Cour fédérale, publiées le 1^er novembre, semblaient initialement donner au VG encore plus qu'il n'avait demandé, mais la décision éventuellement rendue le 6 décembre réin-troduisait d'importantes ambiguîtés. Selon l'argument de l'article, l'entrée du Vérificateur général dans le domaine des conseils prodigués, contrairement aux devoirs traditionnels d'un vérificateur, fait du Bureau du Vérificateur général une véritable instance décisionnelle pour l'adoption de politiques, facteur incompatible avec la notion de gouvernement responsable et représentatif. L'article compare la législation et le mandat fonctionnel du Bureau du VG à ceux des vérificateurs législatifs provinciaux de la Grande-Bretagne, de la Nouvelle-Zélande et de l'Australie. Il en conclut que la législation de 1977 devrait être reformulée afin que le Bureau du VG axe ses travaux de nouveau sur une vérification financeère objective, la portée de son compte rendu pouvant être aussi large qu'il le veut.