试论“地震天谴论”与“日本暧昧论”——两种截然不同的对日本“国家定位”和“未来走向”的诉求

石原慎太郎的"地震天谴论"和大江健三郎"日本暧昧论"代表了"三一一"巨大地震后日本两种截然不同的对"国家定位"和"未来走向"的诉求。前者的民族主义话语本意和后者的理想主义追求形成鲜明对照。它们的相同点是均要面对沉重的历史负资产和日美同盟关系等尖锐的现实问题,两者构成了极其矛盾即"暧昧"的两极。今后日本在"国家定位"等问题上将在这两极之间摇摆。在这样的情况之下,中国因素将起到重要的作用。

A Discussion on "Earthquake Scourge Argument" and "Ambiguous Japan Argument":Two Entirely Different Appeals for "Country Orientation"and "Future Direction" of Japan

Ishiharashintarou’s "earthquake scourge argument" and Ooekenzaburou’s "ambiguous Japan argument" represents two entirely different appeals for "country orientation" and "future direction" of Japan after the "3·11" great earthquake.The nationalism discourse hidden in the former and the idealism pursuit of the latter forms distinct contrast.The similarity of these two arguments is that they both face the sharp realistic problems,such as heavy historical negative assets,U.S.-Japan alliance relationship,and so on.These two arguments form two contradictory poles or two ambiguous poles.From now on,Japan will sway between these two poles in problems such as "country orientation".In this instance,the factor of China will play an important role.