| 以罪过理论检视我国过失犯罪的法定刑配置 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 姜涛.以罪过理论检视我国过失犯罪的法定刑配置[J].北方法学,2013(3):36-45. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 姜涛 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 南京师范大学法学院 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 本文受江苏高校优势学科建设工程资助项目“江苏食品安全监管机制创新及实现路径研究”（PAPD）资助,同时也获得了2012年度高校哲学社会科学基金项目（项目编号2012SJB820011）的资助. |
| |
| 摘 要： | 故意与过失的区分之间应有一个衔接的问题,而这个衔接点应体现在间接故意和有认识的过失之间,即有认识的过失与间接故意在法益侵害程度上相互衔接。正是这种衔接,造成了间接故意和有认识的过失在理论与实践中的区别之难。基于这种相互衔接,过失犯罪的法定刑之最高刑,就应和侵犯同类法益的故意犯罪之最低刑之间保持一致,以解决司法实践中的区别不能之谜。
|
| 关 键 词： | 罪过 过失犯罪 法定刑 |
Review on Statutory Sentence of Negligent Offence in China from the Perspective of Theory on Guilt |
| |
| JIANG Tao.Review on Statutory Sentence of Negligent Offence in China from the Perspective of Theory on Guilt[J].Northern Legal Science,2013(3):36-45. |
| |
| Authors: | JIANG Tao |
| |
| Abstract: | A transitional state of mind should exist between intentional and negligent offence. The con- tion between indirect intentional and knowingly negligent offence in theory and practice. Considering this inter- connection, the maximum statutory sentencing of negligent offence should be consistent with the minimum stat- utory sentencing of intentional offence against the same type of legal interests, thus the predicament of distinc- tion in judicial practice can be resolved accordingly. |
| |
| Keywords: | guilt negligent offence statutory sentence |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录！ |
