| 析合同法移植期前违约制度的合同性 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 李祖华.析合同法移植期前违约制度的合同性[J].行政与法,2005(12):116-119. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 李祖华 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 浙江师范大学,法政经济学院,浙江,金华,321004 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 期前违约制度起源于英美法系。我国1999年颁布的《合同法》明确引入了期前违约制度,然而,对我国《合同法》移植期前违约制度,许多学者提出了质疑。笔者通过对英美法系的期前违约制度与大陆法系的不安抗辩权的对比分析,论证了《合同法》移植期前违约制度的合理性。
|
| 关 键 词： | 期前违约 不安抗辩权 合理性 |
| 文章编号： | 1007-8207(2005)12-0116-04 |
| 修稿时间： | 2005年10月15 |
Study on the Reasonableness of the Introduction of Anticipatory Breach of Contract in Chinese Contract Law |
| |
| Li Zu-hua.Study on the Reasonableness of the Introduction of Anticipatory Breach of Contract in Chinese Contract Law[J].Public Administration & Law,2005(12):116-119. |
| |
| Authors: | Li Zu-hua |
| |
| Abstract: | The doctrine of anticipatory breach of contract that originated from Anglo-American law system was introduced into the contract law,1999 in China.But since its introduction,it has been distrusted by some Chinese legal scholars.Through analyzing and commenting the advantages and the disadvantages of the anticipatory breach of contract and the system of inassured pleading of contract in Continental law system,the author holds that the doctrine of anticipatory breach of contract should be introduced into the Chinese Contract Law. |
| |
| Keywords: | anticipatory breach of contract the system of inassured pleading of contract reasonableness |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
