论贿款公用的定罪量刑问题——对上海《商业贿赂犯罪法律适用研讨会纪要》的质疑

在对受贿罪的定罪量刑认定中，在法律尚未明确规定受贿款项的用途作为法定量刑的前提下，司法实践中，对贿款公用的数额采取“扣除法”是不科学．也是不合理的。上海市近期出台的《商业贿赂犯罪法律适用研讨会纪要》关于贿款公用的相关规定有违罪刑法定原则，也不符合受贿罪犯罪形态理论。建议在刑法第386条中，将“受贿所得数额”删除，保留“受贿情节”，按照受贿情节对行为人定罪量刑。

On the Crimination and Penalty to the Act of Using Bride Money in Public Utilities——Questioning "Forum Memorandum on the Law Application of Commercial Bribery" in Shanghai

With regard to the crimination and penalty to the crime of accepting bribes, there're no explicit stipulations that the usage of bribe money can be the premise of penalty. Therefore, it's not scientific and reasonable to deduct the amount of bribe money used in public utilities. Recently, there was a "Forum Memorandum on the Law Application of Commercial Bribery" in Shanghai,in which some relevant regulations on bribe money used in public utilities don't tally with the principle of a legally prescribed punished for a specified crime. This paper suggests that the article 386 of the Criminal Law should be revised by deleting the amount of bribe money, retaining the circumstances of crime as the foundation to crimination and penalty.