长春亚泰足球俱乐部诉中国足协案再评析——以公共职能为视角

从权力来源角度并不能充分证明中国足协具有行政诉讼被告资格 ,这是形式主义地理解《行政诉讼法》第 2 5条第 4款和《若干问题的解释》第 1条第 1款所致。借鉴英国司法审查的理论 ,从公共职能角度重析中国足协的被告资格 ,结论是人民法院未必不能对中国足协的行为予以司法审查 ,北京市二中院的裁决或许是错误的

Review on the Case "Changchun Yatai Club v. China Football Association"

We can not think China football association not be defendant in administrative litigation from the source of its power. This understanding of article 25, section 4 of Administrative Litigation Law and article 1, section 1 of the Judicial Interpretation on Administrative Litigation Law is false. If we review China football association's qualification of defendant in administrative litigation from the angle of its public function, we can come to a conclusion that the acts of China football association can be reviewed by the court. So, the adjudication of the second intermediate court of Beijing municipality in the case "Changchun Yatai Club v. China Football Association" may be wrong.