首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

海峡两岸职业自由权制度比较研究
引用本文:胡玉浪.海峡两岸职业自由权制度比较研究[J].福建警察学院学报,2013(2):96-103.
作者姓名:胡玉浪
作者单位:福建农林大学公共管理学院,福建福州350002
基金项目:中国法学会部级研究项目“海峡两岸职业自由权制度比较研究”(CLS〈2012〉D220)
摘    要:目前大陆地区《宪法》和台湾地区"宪法"均未对职业自由权作出明文规定,而是通过劳动立法或宪法解释的方式对职业自由权提供保护。职业自由权包括职业选择的自由和职业执行的自由。保障职业自由必须反对强迫劳动。基于公共利益保护的需要,海峡两岸均通过法律对职业自由权的主体及其该权利的行使进行一定的限制,同时明确了职业自由权受侵害时的救济途径和强迫劳动的法律责任。

关 键 词:海峡两岸  职业自由权  保障  限制  救济

Research on the Right of Freedom of Occupation Between Mainland and Taiwan
Authors:HU Yu-lang
Institution:HU Yu-lang(College of Public Management,Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University,Fuzhou 350002,China)
Abstract:In both the constitutions of China mainland and Taiwan territory,none of their language specifically governing the right to free choice of occupation,yet the protection to the right is offered under statute or constitutional interpretations.The construction of the right to free choice of occupation shall cover both the right to select a particular occupation and to performance a particular occupation.In order to protect the right any practice of forced labor should be restricted.Based on public policy,both side of Taiwan Strait placed limitations on the individual to be protected and the way to enforce the right and stipulated the course of action for anyone whose right is injured and the liability for the one who violates the obligation not to commit forced labor conduct.
Keywords:both side of Taiwan Strait  the right to free choice of occupation  protect  restrict  relief
本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号