| 正确的观点缺憾的论证--评郝铁川先生《中国依法治国的渐进性》一文 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 李龙,黄锫.正确的观点缺憾的论证--评郝铁川先生《中国依法治国的渐进性》一文[J].河北法学,2004,22(9):2-7. |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 李龙 黄锫 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 1. 武汉大学,法学院,湖北,武汉,430072;浙江大学,法学院,浙江,杭州,310028
2. 武汉大学,法学院,湖北,武汉,430072 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 认为郝铁川先生《中国依法治国的渐进性》一文的论点是正确的 ,但是论证过程中存在的缺憾使该论点所质有的说服力有所削减 ,且文中三个论据———“穷国无法治”、“愚昧无法治”、“乱世无法治”———显得有些偏激的表述方式不但催生了对表述内容本身的怀疑 ,而且存在被人误解以至利用的危险 ,进而无意间隐含了颠覆法治的力量
|
| 关 键 词： | 法治 穷国无法治 愚昧无法治 乱世无法治 |
| 文章编号： | 1002-3933(2004)09-0002-06 |
| 修稿时间： | 2004年5月18日 |
Right Argument but Wrong Ground of the Argument--Comment on Pro.Hao's article:Gradually Improvement of Rule of Law in China |
| |
| LI Long,HUANG Pei.Right Argument but Wrong Ground of the Argument--Comment on Pro.Hao''''s article:Gradually Improvement of Rule of Law in China[J].Hebei Law Science,2004,22(9):2-7. |
| |
| Authors: | LI Long HUANG Pei |
| |
| Institution: | LI Long~1,HUANG Pei~2 |
| |
| Abstract: | We think that the argument of the article:Gradually Improvement of Rule of Law in China, which wrote by Pro. Haotiechuan is right, but three grounds of the aforesaid argument: no 'rule of law' in poor nations,no 'rule of law' in illiterate nations, no 'rule of law' in disordered nations, are suspicious. |
| |
| Keywords: | rule of law no 'rule of law' in poor nations no 'rule of law' in illiterate nations there no 'rule of law'in discordered nations |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
