司法决策中的“父爱主义”管制逻辑

在包括赵春华案在内的诸多引发舆论关注的争议案件中,法官或许并非不是不懂得如何利用社科法学的判断能力与法教义学的裁判技术去弥合司法标准与公众认知之间的巨大断裂,而更可能是基于其“父爱”式的社会“管制”取向而对司法后果的实质合理性问题做出了“爱之深,责之切”的价值决断。在中国特色社会主义法律体系已经形成的历史背景下,为了保证良法的颁行能够导向预期的善治,法律必须以其作为“社会交往机制”的系统潜力而彰显其公理性与司法的合理性。只有首先确立基于交往原则和承认社会自主性的权力逻辑与法律决策结构,那种体现“人性化”“人文化”和“人权化”的方法论逻辑才有可能在法律的运作中获得国家体制官僚无法武断拒斥的实效。

The Control Logic of Paternalism in the Judicial Decision

In many controversial cases,including Zhao Chunhua Case,which aroused public concern,it may not be that judges do not know how to use the judgment ability of social science law and jurisprudence to bridge the huge gap between judicial standards and public perception.More likely,it is based on its“paternal”social“regulation”orientation that it makes a value decision on the substantive rationality of“judicial consequences”based on“deep love and close responsibility”.Under the historical background of the formation of the socialist legal system with Chinese characteristics,in order to ensure that the enactment of good law can lead to the expected good governance,the law must highlight the rationality of law and judicature with its systematic potential as a“social interaction mechanism”.Only by first establishing the power logic and legal decision-making structure based on the principle of communication and recognizing social autonomy can we truly embody the methodological logic of“humanization”and“human rights”in the operation of law.