首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

司法能动主义与我国民事司法审判的规范与创新
引用本文:杨荣馨,邱星美.司法能动主义与我国民事司法审判的规范与创新[J].政法论丛,2010(6):72-76.
作者姓名:杨荣馨  邱星美
作者单位:中国政法大学民商经济法学院,北京100088
摘    要:司法能动主义传入我国后,引起我国学界特别是司法界的重视,但目前我国司法界所倡导、推崇的司法能动或能动司法与发源于美国的司法能动内涵并不相同,司法能动主义被异化。建议在原意上使用司法能动一词,遵循原意前提下的司法能动应当予以承认并肯定其创新司法的积极意义,但是不可将其泛化,就广义而言我国民事审判工作应当强调规范化。

关 键 词:司法能动  能动司法  审判规范  审判创新

Judicial Activism and the Standardization and Innovation of Civil Trial in China
Yang Rong-xin,Qiu Xing-mei.Judicial Activism and the Standardization and Innovation of Civil Trial in China[J].Journal of Political Science and Law,2010(6):72-76.
Authors:Yang Rong-xin  Qiu Xing-mei
Institution:Yang Rong-xin Qiu Xing-mei(Civil and Economic Law School of China University of Political Science and Law,Beijing 100088)
Abstract:Being introduced into China,the judicial activism has risen a great attention from China's academic circles,especially the judiciaries.But the judicial activism or dynamic administration of justice advocated by China's judiciary does not mean the same thing with the original one in the United States.The judicial activism has been dissimilated.We recommend the use of the term of judicial activism following the original meaning.Under the premise of this,the positive innovation of judicial activism should be acknowledged and affirmed.However,it cannot be generalized.In broad terms,the work of civil trial should emphasize the standardization.
Keywords:judicial activism  dynamic justice  trial standardization  trial innovation
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号