两大法系行政诉讼审前程序模式比较及对我国的启示——以美国和德国为例

随着我国审判方式改革的推进,行政审判实践中出现了庭前证据交换等审前程序改革的有益探索。但是由于我国行政诉讼审前程序规则的不完善,审前准备工作存在诸多问题,这些问题的存在提示着我国审前准备工作程序化的必要性。本文在比较分析了德国和美国的审前程序后,对我国审前程序模式选择提出了建议。

The comparison of pretrial procedure between America and Germany

with the advancement of the trial form reformation in China,pretrial exchange of evidence and other issues have been tried out in the pretrial procedure in administrative judicial practice.However,regulations of pretrial procedure are insufficient and unreasonable in China,as a result,lots of problems exist in pretrial preparation activities,which implies a great necessity to make corresponding reformations in China's administrative pretrial procedure.The theoretical significance to study the pretrial procedure in administrative litigation is to alter the random and fragmentary regulations and rebuild reasonable pretrial procedure in administrative litigation.On the basis of Chinese judicial practice,the author puts forward a scheme on improving the pretrial procedure in administrative litigation in China.