我以为我会忘记

偶尔想起村庄,我会想起那些“蒹葭苍苍、白露为霜”的句子。村庄一味宽容,从不计较我心里嘀咕的啥,是不是跟耕地撒种扯得上,是不是关系到虫害和收成。我在城里这么久,慢慢地变成了一个有闲人。估计这要是在村里,会被归结为不侍弄庄稼、好吃懒做不过日子的二流子。     

我信仰,因我敬畏——拉德布鲁赫《社会主义文化论》译序

如果说思想者就是能够以其睿智和思想启迪社会人生的人,那么我认为拉德布鲁赫就是离我们最近的思想者之一.当然,如果说不同的人从不同的角度去判断会举出完全不同的、很可能是更多的思想者,那么我就说拉德布鲁赫是离我个人最近的思想者之一.我读拉德布鲁赫的文章著述,每每有接受启蒙、开发心智的感觉.     

Should I stay or should I go?

Legal context: The European Patent Convention inherently allows parallel revocationproceedings to take place in the EPO and the domestic patentcourts. As a result, parties to UK patent proceedings frequentlyapply for a stay pending the outcome of proceedings in the EPO.There is commonly assumed to be a presumption in favour of thisstay, so long as it does not amount to an injustice. Key points: This article reviews the UK case law that has followed the Courtof Appeal decision in Kimberly-Clark, to see if this presumptionin favour of a stay is sustained. These cases show that, whendeciding whether to order a stay, judges perform a balancingexercise of a number of considerations. In practice it appearsthat these considerations easily topple the presumption. Practical significance: By providing a comparison of the considerations put before thecourts in the past, this article seeks to aid practitionersin judging those factors likely to affect the success of a stayapplication. It also highlights the lack of authority at appellatelevel on whether it is lawful for patent courts not to ordera stay.     

Me Voici,here I Am,Here I Stand,I Can Do No Other

This article offers a Levinasian reading of the case of Airedale N.H.S. Trust v Bland (1993). My contention is that the judicial reasoning that gave rise to the decision that Anthony Bland should die was driven by an ontological imperative I submit from a Levinasian perspective the decision was ethically indefensible because it failed to recognise Anthony Bland as the other. This revised version was published online in July 2006 with corrections to the Cover Date.     

Reconciliation: I Know It When I see It 1

States emerging from conflict increasingly seek ways in which to address the violence and human rights abuses of the past in order to move forward into a more peaceful future. The initial responses to mass atrocities were based in legal processes focused on the punishment of the person responsible for the harm. The inadequacy of such an approach resulted in the introduction of a variety of new goals in the transitional period, including the abstract notion of reconciliation which is increasingly advanced as the central goal in dealing with the legacy of the past. This article argues that the failure to examine the relationship between a discourse originally based on human rights and legal approaches and the introduction of reconciliation has only added new challenges rather than resolved existing ones and therefore must be re‐examined. The article also argues that no single approach should take prominence in addressing mass atrocities. Rather a range of options should be available to victims, in particular given the relative youth and inexperience of approaches to violent conflict.     

印度:莫迪式反腐

腐败问题影响着印度的国家形象
　　印度崛起是本世纪国际社会最引人注目的现象之一，但伴随着高速发展，印度的腐败现象也与日俱增，各种规模巨大的贪腐案件相继曝光，给印度崛起蒙上了巨大的阴影。     

I have a Facebook account,therefore I am – authentication with social networks

ABSTRACT

Social login is the use of a social network account to get access to other services. Since the internet in its architecture does not have the possibility to identify the internet user, for many services, social logins are the solution to authenticate users without the need to set up individual identity management systems. Social logins are not useful for all types of services, however, and the potential lock-in and lock-out of users needs to be considered.