不良资产处置模式创新的制度诉求

我国四大国有资产公司成立近五年 ,对国有银行剥离的约 1 40 0 0亿人民币不良资产的处置已初见成效。实践中 ,资产公司处置这些不良资产时 ,缺乏足够必要的制度资源支持。在处置不良资产时的制度性障碍若不及早消除 ,继续处置不良资产的难度越来越大。本文从革新处置模式的角度探讨如何完善不良资产处置的相关法律法规     

评罗尔斯的规则功利主义惩罚思想

罗尔斯在《两种规则概念》一文中 ,提出了一种规则功利主义的混合理论 ,他首先对惩罚的制度层面和实践层面进行区分 ,在此基础上分别从两个层面对惩罚进行证明 ,认为惩罚的制度层面可以用功利主义进行证明 ,实践层面可以用报应主义进行证明。但是 ,由于规则功利主义自身的缺陷 ,以及罗尔斯对传统报应主义、功利主义认识的局限 ,这种调和的努力被证明是失败的。     

中韩民族文化对员工行为模式影响的研究——基于大连中韩合资企业的调查

民族文化对该民族成员行为模式产生影响。本文通过对中韩合资企业员工民族文化的调查,发现其民族文化不尽相同,从而使两国员工表现出不同的行为模式,这对中韩合资企业生产经营活动产生某些影响。本文基于两国员工民族文化及受其影响的行为模式,探讨中韩合资企业管理方法选择问题。     

Fatal suicidal crossbow injury--the ability to act

We report a case of a 58-year-old man who committed suicide using a modern crossbow. The victim shot himself in the chest with a conical field-tip arrow from close proximity. We first presumed that this was a case of homicide committed with a firearm. We were, however, subsequently proved wrong. The reasons for the primary statement were as follows: the external morphology of the entrance wound being typical of a firearm discharged from long distance; the perforation found on the victim's clothing; the absence of the firearm at the place of death; the absence of the arrow in the wound. All of these reasons forced us initially to conclude that the case was one of homicide. In the reported case, the man, after having been shot with an arrow, was further able to act, even though the abdominal aorta and liver were seriously injured. While the arrow was in the wound, the injuries may not have led to massive bleeding because of incomplete tamponade of the defects by the arrow shaft. Pulling the arrow out of the victim's wound track initiated massive bleeding. Despite all these injuries, the man was capable of pulling the bow string again and reloading the crossbow with the arrow used in the first attempt. This case demonstrates that forensic investigations into crossbow injuries can be very difficult, especially when the bolt has been removed from the body.     

How unique is the Western European marriage pattern?: A comparison of nuptiality in historical Europe and the contemporary Arab world

In this article a comparison is drawn between the historical Western European marriage pattern (WEMP), and more recent trends in nuptiality in Arab countries. This comparison makes clear that marriage behavior in the present-day Arab world shows striking similarities to nuptiality patterns which have been described by Hajnal and adherents as typically Western European. Due to a combination of economic hardship, ever growing costs in the marriage ceremony, prolonged education and the emancipation of women, people in the Arab world have started to marry at ever higher ages during the past decades. Moreover, there are indications that universal marriage is in decline. Just as Western European couples in the nineteenth century had to spend years of saving in order to meet the economic requirements for marriage, young couples in today's Arab world have to postpone marriage as they are only at a more advanced age able to bear the economic burden involved in getting married. Striking is also the fact that marriage restriction in both societies started at a moment when the social and legal position of women was improving (in late Medieval Western Europe and today in the Arab world). However, in some ways the historical Western European marriage pattern differs from the contemporary Arab pattern. No other marriage regime has been able to completely reduce fertility and balance population growth to economic development. Whereas population growth in pre-twentieth century Europe was only restricted by nuptiality control, demographic expansion in present day Arab society is also restricted by modern family planning. Declining nuptiality in the Arab world can however not, as some might assume, be put under the header of the Second Demographic Transition observed in Western societies, from the 1960s on. After all, until today, a rise in cohabitation and extra-marital births has not occured in the Arab world.     

警察行政行为的司法控制探讨

我国大陆地区的警察行政行为,在其重要程序环节中基本不受其它公权力的制约,具有相当的＂自主性＂,这极易造成警察行政权力与公民权利的失衡状态。对此,要通过检察机关签发令状的令状制度,对警察的行政强制措施进行控制;通过法院行使行政处罚裁决权的处罚司法化,对警察的行政处罚行为予以控制。     

诈骗罪中的处分行为

诈骗罪中的处分行为是没有记载的构成要件要素,是区分盗窃罪和诈骗罪的关键。处分行为,是指被害人基于认识错误而“自愿”地交付财物或处分财产性利益的行为。诈骗罪的成立需要有处分意思,但是,作为处分行为的主观要件,被骗者应当认识到何种程度,即处分意思究竟包括哪些内容便有待探讨。处分意思的内容要求财产处分者对所处分的财产性质、种类、数量、价值有完全的认识,还是只要认识到财产的外形的转移即可,抑或只要具有某种中间形态的认识内容即可？其实,只要被骗者认识到自己的行为是把某种财产转移给对方占有,而根据自己的“自由”意思作出这种决定,就应当认为已经具备了处分意思的内容。     

中国高新技术产业园区布局评析

该文讨论了世界上高新技术产业园区布局的一般规律及中国布局高新技术产业园区的特殊矛盾,分析了香港与内地在发展高新技术产业方面资源的互补性状况,提出了在粤港交界处布局与建设一个跨越两地的高新技术产业＂共建园区＂建设性意见。     

论对“协助司法机关抓捕其他犯罪嫌疑人”的理解与适用

常见的协助抓捕行为有当场指认、实际带捉、提供线索和按要求联络等,协助抓捕的对象是其他犯罪嫌疑人,应视具体情况决定其他犯罪嫌疑人是否包括同案犯。犯罪分子因交代同案犯个人信息而使得司法机关得以成功抓捕同案犯时,是否认定为协助司法机关抓捕同案犯,应考察个人信息是否在犯罪过程中使用,如果已使用就不应认定,反之则可以。而当犯罪分子交代非同案犯的个人信息时,只要这种个人信息不为司法机关所掌握就应认定为立功。     

论恶意诉讼的认定标准

恶意诉讼是指在民事诉讼领域内,行为人为了追求不法目的以合法形式提起诉讼从而损害他人合法权利的行为。恶意诉讼作为侵权行为的一种,与一般侵权行为相比有其特殊性,其认定标准包括以下几个方面：第一,恶意诉讼行为是被受理的起诉行为;第二,恶意诉讼是通过合法形式起诉以达非法目的的行为;第三,恶意诉讼行为人诉讼请求最终没有得到人民法院的支持;第四,原告的恶意诉讼行为使被告造成了损害。