全文获取类型
收费全文 | 85篇 |
免费 | 12篇 |
专业分类
各国政治 | 7篇 |
工人农民 | 1篇 |
世界政治 | 5篇 |
外交国际关系 | 27篇 |
法律 | 35篇 |
政治理论 | 22篇 |
出版年
2023年 | 2篇 |
2022年 | 2篇 |
2020年 | 2篇 |
2019年 | 3篇 |
2018年 | 3篇 |
2017年 | 7篇 |
2016年 | 7篇 |
2015年 | 4篇 |
2014年 | 3篇 |
2013年 | 7篇 |
2012年 | 1篇 |
2011年 | 1篇 |
2010年 | 4篇 |
2009年 | 2篇 |
2008年 | 2篇 |
2007年 | 3篇 |
2006年 | 4篇 |
2005年 | 6篇 |
2004年 | 3篇 |
2003年 | 5篇 |
2002年 | 2篇 |
2000年 | 3篇 |
1999年 | 1篇 |
1998年 | 1篇 |
1996年 | 1篇 |
1993年 | 2篇 |
1991年 | 1篇 |
1990年 | 1篇 |
1989年 | 1篇 |
1987年 | 1篇 |
1986年 | 5篇 |
1985年 | 5篇 |
1984年 | 1篇 |
1977年 | 1篇 |
排序方式: 共有97条查询结果,搜索用时 93 毫秒
1.
Conclusion With the passage of the Administrative Dispute Resolution Act, the stage was set for innovation and change in federal agencies. Now, part way into the five-year life of the Act, a new administration has the potential to encourage even wider use of ADR at the federal level, providing still more examples from which to develop a clearer sense of best practice. Additional funds, both for ACUS and individual agencies, are vital to providing the level of experimentation, innovation, and documentation needed to ensure success.MIT ProfessorLawrence E. Susskind is director of the MIT-Harvard Public Disputes Program, 512 Pound Hall, Harvard Law School, Cambridge, Mass. 02138.Eileen F. Babbitt is associate director of the Public Disputes Program.Phyllis N. Segal is a practicing mediator with Endispute, Incorporated.The authors would like to acknowledge the federal dispute resolution specialists who contributed greatly to our work by providing interviews and materials for this article: Cathy Costantino of FDIC; David Batson of EPA; John Settle and Ron Walczak of HHS; David Drabkin of DLA; Jim Jones of DOL; Sheldon Guttman of FCC; Charles Pou of ACUS; Jeff Domber of GSA; and Diane Liff of DOT. 相似文献
2.
3.
4.
Noah L 《Connecticut law review》2004,36(4):1133-1161
5.
6.
What We Have Learned About Teaching Multiparty Negotiation 总被引:1,自引:1,他引:0
Lawrence Susskind Robert Mnookin Lukasz Rozdeiczer Boyd Fuller 《Negotiation Journal》2005,21(3):395-408
This article grows out of our experience teaching an advanced course on multiparty negotiation. The main question underlying the course is: “How can experts in two‐party negotiations make themselves effective multiparty negotiators?” In this article, we describe what and how we taught, what we think worked, and what we decided to change after the first year of teaching. 相似文献
7.
8.
9.
10.