全文获取类型
收费全文 | 2796篇 |
免费 | 75篇 |
专业分类
各国政治 | 35篇 |
工人农民 | 105篇 |
世界政治 | 19篇 |
外交国际关系 | 53篇 |
法律 | 1215篇 |
中国共产党 | 56篇 |
中国政治 | 377篇 |
政治理论 | 76篇 |
综合类 | 935篇 |
出版年
2023年 | 7篇 |
2022年 | 32篇 |
2021年 | 32篇 |
2020年 | 61篇 |
2019年 | 31篇 |
2018年 | 62篇 |
2017年 | 34篇 |
2016年 | 27篇 |
2015年 | 27篇 |
2014年 | 162篇 |
2013年 | 171篇 |
2012年 | 198篇 |
2011年 | 196篇 |
2010年 | 184篇 |
2009年 | 233篇 |
2008年 | 224篇 |
2007年 | 251篇 |
2006年 | 215篇 |
2005年 | 200篇 |
2004年 | 200篇 |
2003年 | 113篇 |
2002年 | 85篇 |
2001年 | 61篇 |
2000年 | 47篇 |
1999年 | 12篇 |
1998年 | 4篇 |
1997年 | 1篇 |
1989年 | 1篇 |
排序方式: 共有2871条查询结果,搜索用时 15 毫秒
1.
伊玛堪是赫哲族世代相传的民间说唱艺术形式,2011年被列入联合国教科等“急需保护的非物质文化遗产名录”。运用生命历程理论,结合观察和深度访谈法,选择省级赫哲族伊玛堪代表性传承人尤文凤为个案,考察其学习、传承伊玛堪的具体过程,提出伊玛堪的传承与保护既需要作为个体生命的代表性传承人发挥主观能动性,也需要政府、市场、专家学者、媒体等多种社会力量与其协同合作。 相似文献
2.
法医工作者的职业暴露风险极大,案件现场及尸体上的有毒有害物质、高致病性微生物以及利器、骨折等因素均可能给法医带来身心伤害甚至生命危险。随着经济社会发展,法医的工作环境已经较过去显著改善,但是针对个人防护的重视程度仍需提高。近年来公共卫生事件频发,给法医职业防护带来新的挑战,迫切需要借鉴生物安全领域的先进技术和防护理念,以满足新形势下法医工作的需要。本指南立足当前法医职业防护的实际需求,从暴露风险、防护分级、应急处置等角度阐述,希望能为制定法医职业防护相关标准提供参考,以指导法医工作者开展个人防护工作,为提升法医职业化水平和身心健康提供帮助。 相似文献
3.
漓江是桂林的母亲河,是桂林旅游业的精华和精品。要更好地治理漓江,经营漓江,促进漓江旅游业的可持续性发展,必须注重水生态的保护与修复。 相似文献
4.
完善宪法程序若干问题初探 总被引:8,自引:0,他引:8
我国目前亟需完善的宪法程序为 :各级人民代表选举程序 ;修改宪法程序 ;保护公民宪法权利的宪政立法程序 ;执政党执政程序 ;违宪审查程序 ;其他国家机关对本级国家权力机关负责的程序 ;国家权力机关监督本级其他国家机关的程序。 相似文献
5.
管晓静 《山西警官高等专科学校学报》2003,11(3):37-40
我国对犯罪嫌疑人的权利保护与过去相比已经有所改善,但仍存在不少问题,刑讯逼供、超期羁押、违反平等比例原则、侵犯犯罪嫌疑人获得帮助和救济的权利等现象时有发生.文章主要针对上述现象提出一些相应的对策. 相似文献
6.
刑事诉讼告知义务初探 总被引:2,自引:0,他引:2
告知义务是国家赋予国家机关(含警察、检察官及法官)告知被追诉人(犯罪嫌疑人、被告人)相关的事实、理由及权利的义务,是国家机关在刑事诉讼中承担的关照、帮助被追诉人实现其权利的一项特别义务。设定国家机关的告知义务,有利于保障被追诉人充分行使其权利。不论是国际公约还是一些法治发达国家都有关于告知义务的明确规定。我国刑事诉讼法对于告知义务的规定相对简单,应参照并借鉴国际公约及西方法治发达国家的立法经验,予以修改与完善。 相似文献
7.
设立宪法法院负责宪法监督工作是一种最切合实际的完善我国宪法监督制度的方案。除在中央设立宪法法院外,可在地方设立巡回宪法法院。宪法法院应当具有相对独立性。为保证宪法法院有效行使其宪法监督职能,必须赋予其事前审查权、宪法解释权等职权。宪法监督程序须由相应的主体提起。 相似文献
8.
Handong Wu 《Frontiers of Law in China》2006,1(3):329-348
Legal principle, which underlies the value of the legal system, is supposed to be the origin and basis of concrete legal rules.
It has also resulted from abstracting and summarizing the value and spirit of these legal rules. In light of the universality
and hierarchy of legal principle, the principles of the international protection system of intellectual property rights (IPR)
can be divided into the following two types: one is the fundamental principles applied to the what, why and how a legal system
shall be constructed, such as principles of sovereignty, equality and mutual benefit, joint development, and international
cooperation, which also can be expressed as the principles of sovereignty, international coordination and cooperation, fairness
and justice. The other type includes those existing in the legal system and capable of being applied directly, such as the
principle of national treatment, principle of minimum standard, principle of independence (for industrial property right),
principle of independent protection (for copyright), principle of compulsory implementing patent (for patent right) and doctrine
of priority (for industrial property right), etc.
In my opinion, the principles of the international protection system of IPR shall follow the latter model, indicating that
they shall be provided and written in the international conventions on the grounds that they can be applied directly, and
that they can be universally applied to the whole international protection system of IPR instead of exclusive application
to one certain system. Hereupon, the author believes that principles concerning the international protection system of IPR
should include the principles of national treatment, minimum protection standard and public interest. 相似文献
9.
A. J. Barnard 《Law and Critique》2006,17(2):153-170
The aim of this paper is to identify the possible substructure (looking glass/es) of a critical legal argument for contractual
justice (Wonderland) in the South African law of contract. South African contract law still fails, ten years after the constitutional
transformation, to reflect the constitutional ideals of freedom, equality and human dignity in an acceptable manner. I argue
that this disposition places a question mark over the legitimacy of contract law and marginalizes opportunities for the social
change envisaged by the Constitution. The paper explores Duncan Kennedy’s Form and Substance-argument and indicates that the
reluctance to accommodate these values may be attributable to the fact that the majority of role-players position themselves
on the individualism/rules side of Kennedy’s continuum – a paradigm that perceives the law of contract as a body of positivistic
rules to be applied neutrally and regardless of the social or socio-economic distortions its application may generate. In
an attempt to move away from this traditional approach, the privileged paradigm is criticised. A typical CLS-approach is followed
which employs sociology, psychological jurisprudence and game theory to criticise the law from outside the restrictive realms
of law itself. Simultaneously, I attempt to illuminate the argument for a shift (step through the looking glass) to another
paradigm. I conclude that our judiciary finds itself in a position similar to that of Plato’s prisoners in the cave and will
not reach the point where they apply relevant (constitutional) values directly to contractual disputes. The State is thus
responsible for infusing contract law with contractual justice, by implementing legislation to this effect in order to limit
the hegemonic consequences of the judiciary’s obsession with freedom of contract and utopian rules, which fail in reality
to further the ideal of justice.
Paper presented at the Critical Legal Conference, 4 September 2004, London, UK. This paper is dedicated to the memory of the
late Judge of Appeal, Mr. Justice P.J. Olivier. The paper is based on research conducted for the thesis in partial fulfilment
of the degree LLD in the Faculty of Law at the University of Pretoria under the title ‘A critical legal argument for contractual
justice in the South African law of contract.’ The degree supervisor is Professor Karin van Marle in the Department of Legal
History, Comparative Law and Jurisprudence. The author wishes to thank the following persons for valuable deliberations and
input: Karin van Marle, Graham Bradfield and Anashri Pillay. In addition, the author wishes to acknowledge and thank the University
of Cape Town for financially supporting this research.
†Paper presented at the Critical Legal Conference, 4 September 2004, London, UK. This paper is dedicated to the memory of
the late Judge of Appeal, Mr. Justice
P.J. Olivier. The paper is based on research conducted for the thesis in partial
fulfilment of the degree LLD in the Faculty of Law at the University of Pretoria
under the title ‘A critical legal argument for contractual justice in the South African
law of contract.’ The degree supervisor is Professor Karin van Marle in the
Department of Legal History, Comparative Law and Jurisprudence. The author
wishes to thank the following persons for valuable deliberations and input: Karin
van Marle, Graham Bradfield and Anashri Pillay. In addition, the author wishes to
acknowledge and thank the University of Cape Town for financially supporting this
research. apply relevant (constitutional) values directly to contractual disputes. The State is
thus responsible for infusing contract law with contractual justice, by implementing
legislation to this effect in order to limit the hegemonic consequences of the judiciary’s
obsession with freedom of contract and utopian rules, which fail in reality to
further the ideal of justice. 相似文献
10.
梁宏辉 《天水行政学院学报》2006,(4):90-93
民事起诉权是当事人一项重要的诉讼权利,是公民的基本权利在民事诉讼领域的重要体现。它具有启动民事诉讼程序、维护当事人合法权益、制约法院审判权的滥用等多方面的功能。我国现行的一些制度诸如起诉和受理制度等对于民事起诉权的保障还存在许多不足,有待于进一步完善。 相似文献