加强检察机关执法办案自身监督制约机制的思考

强化自身监督制约,提高严格、公正、文明执法的能力,是提高检察机关法律监督能力的重要组成部分,也是检察机关正确行使权力、防止权力滥用的重要保证.虽然近年来检察机关在加强和完善执法办案自身监督制约方面做了大量工作,也取得了一定成效,但仍然存在一些问题,面临一些挑战.因此,如何构建完善我国检察机关执法办案的自身监督制约机制,如何加强检察机关自身建设、建立自身监督制约体系,是检察改革的重中之重和亟待解决的重要问题.     

抓好“四个围绕” 推进领导干部廉洁自律

检察机关作为法律监督机关和反腐斗争的重要职能部门，必须做到严格、公正、文明执法。要始终坚持以教育、制度、监督、保障为一体的工作思路，紧密结合检察机关特点和检察工作实际，通过构建“四个围绕”防控机制，有效保障和促进检察机关领导干部廉洁清正。     

强化内部自身监督筑牢检察工作发展之基

检察机关的自身监督是促进严格公正文明执法．推动检察工作和队伍建设全面健康发展的有力保障。 一、目前检察机关自身监督的现状 一是外部监督过于“软”,失于“宽”,监督效果不佳,监督流于形式。近年来,一些地方探索的人大代表视察检察工作、检察公开日活动、阳光检务和人民监督员制度等大都体现在一种形式或者具体个案方面。     

强化内部监督 提升执法公信力

执法公信力,是人民群众对司法机关维护法律公平正义能力的信任程度。检察机关作为宪法确定的国家法律监督机关,肩负着行使法律监督职能、维护社会公平正义的重任。加强执法公信力建设,是社会主义民主和法制建设的必然要求,是检察机关特别是基层检察院共同面临的重要课题。在新的形势下,基层检察机关提升执法公信力必须本着"监督者必先接受监督"的原则,切实把强化内部监督放在与法律监督同等重要的位置上来抓,用比监督别人更严的要求来监督自己,突出抓好自身监督制约机制建设,确保严格、公正、文明、廉洁执法,以其"自身正、自身硬、自身净"赢得公众的信任和支持。     

检务督察科学发展的路径选择

检务督察,是检察机关强化内部监督,加强队伍建设,确保检察机关严格、公正、文明执法,提高执法公信力的一项改革举措。北京市人民检察院第一分院自2006年开展检务督察工作以来,以科学发展观为指导,紧密结合本院的工作特点和职能定位,适应     

浅析如何提高检察机关执法公信力

执法公信力是执法能力的主要标志,具体到检察机关,就是指检察院通过公正严格文明执法、全面履行职责,赢得党、国家和人民群众的信任的能力。现阶段,我国正在着力推进民主法治建设,群众的民主权利意识不断加强,在这样的社会语境下,检察机关在建设执法公信力的过程中,就必须不断提高三项能力来应对越来越严格的挑战。     

检察机关全面正确履行法律监督职责浅谈

作为基层人民检察院，提升法律监督水平，必须从树立符合科学发展观要求的法律监督观入手，就是要坚持以科学发展观为指导，全面正确履行法律监督职责，努力树立严格公正文明执法的检察形象。     

检察机关全面正确履行法律监督职责浅谈

作为基层人民检察院,提升法律监督水平,必须从树立符合科学发展观要求的法律监督观入手,就是要坚持以科学发展观为指导,全面正确履行法律监督职责,努力树立严格公正文明执法的检察形象.     

简论加强法律监督说理

检察机关是国家法律监督机关,担负着维护国家法律统一、正确实施,保障在全社会实现公平正义的重要职责。对于检察机关来说,执法公正或者说司法公正是其法律监督工作的必然要求。在检察机关各项法律监督工作中加强说理,是提高法律监督能力的具体举措,是实现司法公正、充分发挥法律监督职能所不可或缺的重要手段,应该采取教育培训等具体措施,全面加强法律监督说理性,切实提升监督实效。     

在提高女检察官法律监督能力上下功夫

女检察官要深化对加强法律监督能力建设、促进执法规范重要意义的认识,刻苦学习,深入钻研,勤于实践,在提高法律监督能力上下功夫,做规范执法的模范。日益复杂繁重的检察任务,要求女检察官不落后、不懈怠,通过自学与培训,以及开展岗位练兵等多种途径,提高自身的能力素质,并转化为推动检察事业的动力。各地女检察官协会要千方百计为女检察官素质能力的提高创造学习交流的机会,提供实践锻炼的平台。各地女检察官协会和女检察官在当前开展的专项整改活动中,努力争做为民执法、公正执法、严格执法、文明执法的模范,为展示忠诚、公正、清廉、严明…     

流浪乞讨与管制--从贫困救助看中央与地方权限的界定

随着《收容遣送办法》的废止,个人自由权利与社会治安秩序之间的现实冲突比过去更为突显。应转变中央和地方关系的传统思维,在允许地方更多自主权和选择权的同时,更充分地保障公民个人的宪法基本权利。无论是中央和地方关系的法律界定,还是公民权利的宪法保障,都要求建立独立的司法机构以审查地方立法的有效性。     

International aid,trade and investment and access and allocation

International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics - The access to goods and their allocation (who gets what, when, where and how) is one of the analytical problems of the 2009...     

Implementing and evaluating crime prevention and control programs and policies

The history of crime prevention and control efforts in the United States has demonstrated little progressive improvement in our ability to deter crime. The major obstacles to implementing effective interventions and policies have been a weak scientific knowledge base about how to prevent crime, the research community's inability to effectively disseminate what is known about the causes of crime and to translate this knowledge into operational programs and policies, and a resistance on the part of practitioners and policy makers to evaluate programs and policies and to use this information in the development of new programs and policies. In the last decade, there have been major advances in our understanding about the causes of crime and we have now demonstrated the effectiveness of selected prevention programs. But there is little evidence that this scientific knowledge is informing current practice or policy. Problems in the dissemination of this information and the resistance to utilizing it remain. These problems are discussed and suggestions are made for addressing them. Our knowledge base remains modest, but it is now sufficient to inform policy and practice. The research community must work to do a better job of disseminating this information and overcoming the resistance to utilizing it before we will be successful in implementing effective crime prevention programs and policies. This revised version was published online in July 2006 with corrections to the Cover Date.     

Accommodation and Satisfaction: Women and Men Lawyers and the Balance of Work and Family

This study of graduates of the University of Michigan Law School from the late 1970s reports on the differing ways that women and men have responded to the conflicting claims of work and family. It finds that women with children who have entered the profession have indeed continued to bear the principal responsibilities for the care of children, but it also finds that these women, with all their burdens, are more satisfied with their careers and with the balance of their family and professional lives than other women and than men.     

油气储运防火安全分析及预防措施

本文主要从设备故障与维护、防静电、动火作业、执行操作规程等几个方面引起的爆炸和火灾进行分析,制定对应的防护措施。提出了以做好设备维护保养、防静电处理、做好防火设计及安全装置、落实动火作业措施及强化安全培训等方面进行综合防控,消除油气储运过程中引起的爆炸和火灾,以实现安全生产。     

Truth and Justice, Inquiry and Advocacy, Science and Law

Abstract. There is tension between the adversarialism of the U.S. legal culture and the investigative procedures of the sciences, and between the law's concern for finality and the open‐ended fallibilism of science. A long history of attempts to domesticate scientific testimony by legal rules of admissibility has left federal judges with broad screening responsibilities; recent adaptations of adversarialism in the form of court‐appointed experts have been criticized as “inquisitorial,” even “undemocratic.” In exploring their benefits and disadvantages, it would make sense to look to the experience of other legal systems.     

真相与正义，探究与辩护，科学与法律

在美国法律文化塑造下的对抗制诉讼制度和科学的调查程序之间存在着紧张关系（tension），在法律所关注的裁决终局性（finality）和科学所追求的持续性纠错（oven—minded fallibilism）之间存在着紧张关系。长期以来，法律界都试图通过可采性法律规则归化科学证言，结果导致联邦法官担负起广泛的审查职责；近期，法庭指定专家的制度实践导致对抗制度做出某些修正，这种制度实践已经被批评为“带有纠问色彩”（inquisitorial），甚至“违背了民主的要求”（undemocratic）。在分析这些制度利弊的过程中，我们有必要考察其他法律系统的经验教训。