深入开展普法依法、治理扎实推进法治理工作

武汉市于2006年正式启动“五五”普法依法治理工作，市、区、各部门、各单位围绕中心、服务大局，突出重点，大胆创新，深入开展法制宣传教育，扎实推进依法治理工作，全市500万对象接受了普法宣传教育，“五”普法工作任务圆满完成。广大公民法律意识明显增强；     

“五个一”构建法治社区

做好社区普法依法治理工作，始终是基层普法工作的重头戏。伴随着社区发生新的变革，和县自“五五”普法以来，在全县32个社区开展了“法律进社区”活动，以法制教育为先导，扎实推进社区依法治理工作，取得了良好成效。     

实施“五五”普法宣传教育的若干思考

新时期的“五五”普法教育,应该本着继承与提高、借鉴与创新的原则,认真处理好继承与创新、一般与重点、短期与长期、政府主导与公众参与的关系,积极探索普法依法治理工作的新理念、新方法、新途径,努力实现新时期普法依法治理工作的新突破和新跨越。一、处理好继承与创新的关系,开创“五五”普法新局面“五五”普法既要开拓创新,又要加强基础,既要求发展又要继承过去普法的优秀成果及其成功经验,继续按照“四五”普法“党委领导、政府主抓、人大政协监督检查、各部门齐抓共管、全社会共同参与”的普法工作机制,来推动“五五”普法规划的落…     

加强法制宣传教育 推进“三项重点工作” 服务经济社会发展

2009年,在司法部党组的正确领导下,在各地各部门共同努力下,普法依法治理工作紧紧围绕党和国家工作大局,全面推进“五五”普法规划的贯彻落实,取得显著成绩。     

加快建设“法治平遥”服务转型跨越发展

2011年12月2日，山西省平遥县召开“五五”普法总结表彰暨“六五”普法启动会，对“五五”普法和依法治理工作中做出突出贡献的先进单位和个人进行表彰，对“六五”普法和依法治理各项工作做出全面部署。县委书记、县依法治县领导组组长李非忠，县委副书记、县长、     

新形势下普法依法治理工作的几点思考

明年是“五五”普法依法治理工作的总结验收年，新一轮普法和依法治理规划正在筹划之中，普法依法治理工作进入了发展的关键时期。当前，有关普法依法治理工作的争议很多，突出表现在两个方面，一方面是全民普法开展近25年了，普及法律常识的阶段早已经过去，公民的法律意识有了很大的提高，普法教育有没有必要继续搞？     

合肥市包河区人大扎实推进“五五”普法工作

今年是“五五”普法工作检查验收年。自2006年“五五”普法开展以来，包河区人大常委会认真履行法定职责，深入扎实开展形式多样的普法教育活动，充分发挥了地方国家权力机关在普法和依法治理工作中的作用。     

普法春雨遍洒江淮 依法治理硕果满枝——我省形成依法治理工作新体系

一个“党委领导、人大监督、政府组织实施、各部门齐抓共管、全社会广泛参与”的大普法工作格局在我省已初步形成，一个以基层依法治理为基础、行业依法治理为支柱、地方依法治理为主体的依法治理工作体系已初见规模。全省各地蓬勃开展的“五五”普法和依法治理工作，有力促进了经济社会健康发展和社会和谐稳定。     

和县：用“金钥匙”打开法律之门

6月4日和5日，本刊记者随“江淮普法行”采访团在和县进行了采访。该县在“五五”，普法中创造性地实施农民普法“金钥匙”工程，可谓抓住了“五五”普法的重点，破解了农民普法的难点，创新了基层普法工作的机制，扩展了普法，依法治理的平台，取得了许多新经验。     

以科学发展观统领法治城市创建活动

法治城市、法治县（市、区）创建是普法依法治理工作的进一步深化，也是全面落实依法治国基本方略的生动实践。最近，全国普法办副主任、司法部副部长张苏军在“法治江苏建设高层论坛”开幕式致辞时强调，开展法治城市、法治县（市、区）创建活动，是“五五”普法规划确定的一项基本工作，是深入推进普法依法治理的重要载体，     

流浪乞讨与管制--从贫困救助看中央与地方权限的界定

随着《收容遣送办法》的废止,个人自由权利与社会治安秩序之间的现实冲突比过去更为突显。应转变中央和地方关系的传统思维,在允许地方更多自主权和选择权的同时,更充分地保障公民个人的宪法基本权利。无论是中央和地方关系的法律界定,还是公民权利的宪法保障,都要求建立独立的司法机构以审查地方立法的有效性。     

Implementing and evaluating crime prevention and control programs and policies

The history of crime prevention and control efforts in the United States has demonstrated little progressive improvement in our ability to deter crime. The major obstacles to implementing effective interventions and policies have been a weak scientific knowledge base about how to prevent crime, the research community's inability to effectively disseminate what is known about the causes of crime and to translate this knowledge into operational programs and policies, and a resistance on the part of practitioners and policy makers to evaluate programs and policies and to use this information in the development of new programs and policies. In the last decade, there have been major advances in our understanding about the causes of crime and we have now demonstrated the effectiveness of selected prevention programs. But there is little evidence that this scientific knowledge is informing current practice or policy. Problems in the dissemination of this information and the resistance to utilizing it remain. These problems are discussed and suggestions are made for addressing them. Our knowledge base remains modest, but it is now sufficient to inform policy and practice. The research community must work to do a better job of disseminating this information and overcoming the resistance to utilizing it before we will be successful in implementing effective crime prevention programs and policies. This revised version was published online in July 2006 with corrections to the Cover Date.     

International aid,trade and investment and access and allocation

International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics - The access to goods and their allocation (who gets what, when, where and how) is one of the analytical problems of the 2009...     

Accommodation and Satisfaction: Women and Men Lawyers and the Balance of Work and Family

This study of graduates of the University of Michigan Law School from the late 1970s reports on the differing ways that women and men have responded to the conflicting claims of work and family. It finds that women with children who have entered the profession have indeed continued to bear the principal responsibilities for the care of children, but it also finds that these women, with all their burdens, are more satisfied with their careers and with the balance of their family and professional lives than other women and than men.     

真相与正义，探究与辩护，科学与法律

在美国法律文化塑造下的对抗制诉讼制度和科学的调查程序之间存在着紧张关系（tension），在法律所关注的裁决终局性（finality）和科学所追求的持续性纠错（oven—minded fallibilism）之间存在着紧张关系。长期以来，法律界都试图通过可采性法律规则归化科学证言，结果导致联邦法官担负起广泛的审查职责；近期，法庭指定专家的制度实践导致对抗制度做出某些修正，这种制度实践已经被批评为“带有纠问色彩”（inquisitorial），甚至“违背了民主的要求”（undemocratic）。在分析这些制度利弊的过程中，我们有必要考察其他法律系统的经验教训。     

油气储运防火安全分析及预防措施

本文主要从设备故障与维护、防静电、动火作业、执行操作规程等几个方面引起的爆炸和火灾进行分析,制定对应的防护措施。提出了以做好设备维护保养、防静电处理、做好防火设计及安全装置、落实动火作业措施及强化安全培训等方面进行综合防控,消除油气储运过程中引起的爆炸和火灾,以实现安全生产。     

Truth and Justice, Inquiry and Advocacy, Science and Law

Abstract. There is tension between the adversarialism of the U.S. legal culture and the investigative procedures of the sciences, and between the law's concern for finality and the open‐ended fallibilism of science. A long history of attempts to domesticate scientific testimony by legal rules of admissibility has left federal judges with broad screening responsibilities; recent adaptations of adversarialism in the form of court‐appointed experts have been criticized as “inquisitorial,” even “undemocratic.” In exploring their benefits and disadvantages, it would make sense to look to the experience of other legal systems.