共查询到19条相似文献,搜索用时 890 毫秒
1.
损伤鉴定时间是指在法医临床实践对某一损伤的程度进行评价的最佳时间点。是以临床医学对损伤的自然转归及临床治愈所需时程的认识为基础,结合法医临床检案经验与统计分析而形成的,关于某类损伤形成较为固定的形态所需时间的经验性判断。一、鉴定时间认识与实践的矛盾《人体重伤鉴定标准》第3条第3款和《人体轻伤鉴定标准(试行)第3条均规定在评价损伤程度时不仅要考虑损伤的原发性病变,还要考虑与损伤有直接关系的井发症及损伤弓愧的后遗症,“全面分析,综合评定”。此规定被认为是损伤鉴定时间的法律依据。在此姑且不论应如何从逻辑… 相似文献
2.
3.
4.
抓伤的法医学鉴定(附4例报告) 总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1
抓伤是法医检案中常见的损伤之一。对犯罪分子在被害人身上造成的抓伤进行检验,有时对侦察破案起到很大作用。在排除其他损伤的前提下,根据抓伤部位、形态、施力方向、形成时间,结合被害的现场、彼此相对位置、遇害时间等情况综合分析,可揭示此种损伤的本质。1 案例报道例1 某日,魏某行窃被姑妈发现,魏某将其姑妈扼死。在扼死过程中,其姑妈用右手抓魏某扼颈的右手背,造成多处抓伤。案发第二天,侦查员问及魏某手背损伤如何形成时,魏称碾米时被箩筐边划的。认为有疑点,请法医对魏的损伤进行鉴定。法医检验见魏某右手背第二、三、四掌指关节… 相似文献
5.
6.
法医临床鉴定,俗称法医伤情鉴定,是指运用法医学和临床学专业知识对人体的损伤程度、伤残等级及其他与临床医学及法律有关的各种损伤进行鉴定和评定,并提供鉴定意见的活动.但由于我国司法鉴定实践起步较晚,加上法律条文的滞后以及各种利益的掣肘,我国现行的司法鉴定制度存在诸多弊端,司法鉴定工作也十分混乱,出现了或多或少的问题.本文旨对法医临床鉴定中存存的问题进行分析并就如何提高鉴定质量谈谈个人意见. 相似文献
7.
笔者多年从事法医临床鉴定工作,现就损伤分析在法医临床鉴定中的应用与同行探讨。1损伤形态与鉴定在法医临床鉴定中常见的损伤形态是皮肤的创口形态和骨骼骨折的形态。1.1皮肤创口形态创是致伤物或外力作用于皮肤组织造成皮肤及以下组织解剖学结构完整性破坏的结果,其表现形式 相似文献
8.
9.
正笔者多年从事法医临床鉴定工作,现就损伤分析在法医临床鉴定中的应用与同行探讨。1损伤形态与鉴定在法医临床鉴定中常见的损伤形态是皮肤的创口形态和骨骼骨折的形态。1.1皮肤创口形态创是致伤物或外力作用于皮肤组织造成皮肤及以下组织解剖学结构完整性破坏的结果,其表现形式 相似文献
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
In this paper we describe the first large-scale, long-term study of how hosts connected to the Internet manage their clocks. This is important for forensic investigations when there is a need for correlation of events collected from disparate sources, as well as for the correlation of computer events to “real” time. We have sampled over 8000 web servers on the Internet on a regular basis for a period of over six months. We have found that only about 74% of the hosts we observed were within 10 s of our reference time (UTC). The other hosts exhibited a large variety of different clock behaviors, some of which are explainable by existing clock models, some not, warranting further research in the area of forensic time and clock analysis. 相似文献
18.
19.
Situating events and traces in time is an essential problem in investigations. To date, among the typical questions issued in forensic science, time has generally been unexplored. The reason for this can be traced to the complexity of the overall problem, addressed by several scientists in very limited projects usually stimulated by a specific case. Considering that such issues are recurrent and transcending the treatment of each trace separately, the formalisation of a framework to address dating issues in criminal investigation is undeniably needed. Through an iterative process consisting of extracting recurrent aspects discovered from the study of problems encountered by practitioners and reported in the literature, common mechanisms were extracted and provide understanding of underlying factors encountered in forensic practise. Three complementary approaches are thus highlighted and described to formalise a preliminary framework that can be applied for the dating of traces, objects, persons and indirectly events. 相似文献