试析国际政治经济学与国际机制论

国际政治经济学是以国家与市场, 权力与财富为核心来观察世界事务与国际关系的 理论, 它包括三大主流理论:经济自由主义、经济民族主义和马克思主义。经济自由主义与经济民 族主义一直居于政治经济学的主导范畴。从经济民族主义、经济自由主义围绕国家与市场、权 力与货币的争论来分析, 利用国际机制论整合经济自由主义与经济民族主义的观点是可取的, 并且国际机制论采取的研究视角和主题, 构建着经济相互依存与政治权力之间的桥梁, 有着较广 阔的发展前景。     

英文刊物China International Studies

正英文刊物China International Studies于2005年12月12日正式创刊发行。本刊重点探讨国际政治、世界经济、国际安全与全球战略中的热点问题,追求严肃扎实的学风,反映最新学术研究进展,是学术界、研究机构和政府决策者以及关注国际问题人士的良友。栏目设有:中国外交、国际关系、国际政治、国际经济等专栏。     

中国国际问题研究

正英文刊物China International Studies于2005年12月正式创刊。本刊重点探讨国际政治、世界经济、国际安全与全球战略中的热点问题,追求严肃扎实的学风,反映最新学术研究进展,是学术界、研究机构和政府决策者以及关注国际问题人士的良友。栏目设有:外交理论与实践、国际关系、国际政治、国际经济,等等。     

朝鲜半岛国际经济合作的可能性及问题

文章对朝鲜半岛国际经济合作的可能性及问题进行了阐述.作者认为,朝鲜半岛良好气氛的创造,有利于大国关系的良性互动,而促进朝鲜半岛国际经济合作的关键,在于如何实施正确的对朝政策.     

国际形势新变化与中国的战略选择

国际形势正经历冷战结束以来最深刻的演变.全球化进程有所退潮、大国力量对比变化加速、国际战略格局深度调整、各国公共管理遭遇难题、不同社会思潮相互角力.世界正进入一个充满混沌与焦灼的新时期,在和平与冲突、发展与衰退、开放与孤立、自由与保守中,人类再一次面临重大的权衡与选择.中国努力“高举合作共赢旗帜,引领开放变革潮流”,在世界乱局中维护发展的良好外部环境,在国际体系变局中提升地位影响和制度性权利.中国30年来的发展成就是在融入既有国际体系过程中取得的,中国是既有国际体系的参与者、建设者而非挑战者和颠覆者.今后,中国将以更具建设性的姿态,与国际伙伴一道共同推动国际体系朝着更合理的方向发展,以更好地维护世界和平和安全,推动世界可持续发展.     

当前中国面临的国际经济环境

当前美国经济和世界经济正走向复苏，中国面临的国际经济环境趋好；中长期内新一轮的产业结构调整加快进行，新的国际分工体系正在形成。中国拟应适时制定正确战略，积极开展区域经济合作，扩大外国直接投资和对外投资，进一步参与国际生产体系。     

简讯

由上海国际问题研究院和世界“文明对话”公众论坛联合举办的“中俄经济合作与国际经济体系转型国际研讨会”于2010年7月14--16日在上海举行,来自中国、俄罗斯的40余名学者参加了研讨会。世界“文明对话”公众论坛主席、俄罗斯铁路公司总裁B．H．亚库宁和上海国际问题研究院院长杨洁勉出席了研讨会并做了主旨发言。     

国际格局与日美经济竞争态势的演变

国际格局演变必然对国际行为主体的发展产生制约作用,从而对该国的国际经济竞争能力产生影响。战后长达半个世纪美苏争霸和东西方冷战的两极格局,严重削弱了美国的国际经济竞争力;而日本利用这一发展机遇,不断增强经济竞争力,在日美经济竞争中呈现出"日攻美守"态势。冷战后国际格局由两极走向多极,日本面临的国际竞争环境日益严峻,日美经济竞争态势逆转,呈现"美攻日守"态势。     

国际数字经济竞争新态势与中国的应对

数字经济的发展打破了已有的竞争秩序,加速国际经济竞争格局的重塑,跨国公司与非跨国公司、发达经济体和发展中经济体的竞争优势有可能出现重大变化。西方发达经济体从抢占国际数字市场、争夺数字科技优势地位、主导数字贸易规则制定等方面强化自身的竞争力,谋求在国际数字经济竞争中抢得先机。中国应通过“数字一带一路”建设助力其他发展中经济体的数字经济发展,与其他发展中经济体一道积极参与数字贸易国际规则的制定,妥善处理与西方发达经济体在数字经济领域的竞争与分歧,推动各国共享数字经济红利。     

单极还是多极——对当前国际格局的冷思考

冷战结束后，“极”这个概念，无论是在内涵上，还是外延上都发生了变化。在对“极”的概念重新界定的基础上，笔者指出国际格局更替的根本原因是世界经济的发展和世界各大强国经济发展的不平衡性，国际格局最终确立的依据依然是各国的综合国力。当前国际格局是单极格局出当前单极格局的不稳定性客观上能够推动多极格局的早日实现。     

中国—东盟贸易模型的演进和变迁——从亚洲金融危机到东亚一体化加深（1997～2004年）

过去10年间，东亚经历灾难性的亚洲金融危机和之后的蓬勃发展的区域经济一体化加深两个完全不同的阶段，对东亚地区的经济发展以及世界经济格局都产生了迥异而深远的影响。亚洲金融危机导致东南亚国家和除中国外的东亚国家货币大幅贬值，股票价格和资产价格下跌，许多国家多年的经济繁荣毁于一旦，不仅破坏了东亚乃至全球的金融体系，而且对世界经济增长以及贸易流量产生了严重的消极影响。     

东亚贸易演变与产业结构调整

一、东亚经济发展政策的转变 （一）进口替代政策 从二战后到20世纪60年代末，东亚地区整体上处于恢复经济、完善经济结构阶段，重点发展工业，实行进口替代型的工业发展道路。经过20多年的发展，东亚地区建立了比较完整的工业体系，摆脱了对外国产品的严重依赖，     

Sorting out the Conceptual Muddle: The Role of the Japanese Economy in the Asian Financial Crisis

Karel van Wolferen argues that, since Japan's political economy was the main factor in creating the circumstances that led up to the East Asian financial crisis, studies must focus on it to understand this event. The Japanese economy, which is here described as a war economy operating in peacetime, provided the model for East Asia's 'tiger economies' that imitated the Japanese government in its targeting of sectors for investment, especially the construction industry in the 1980s. These other East Asian economies proved more vulnerable to crisis than the Japanese economy because they were more open to foreign investment and did not have Japan's closely knit economic and financial networks and institutions. After presenting this preface to the crisis, van Wolferen then criticizes the current East Asian economic situation, in which international institutions continue to force the Western ideals of transparency and deregulation on most of the East Asian economies while permitting Japan to remain the least transparent economy of the entire region.     

论东亚经济增长模式的特征

东亚金融危机之后,关于东亚经济增长模式纷争不断。东亚宏观经济模式的特征可以概括成高储蓄率、高投资率、高出口比重和大政府,东亚微观经济模式的特征可以概括成企业的家族式管理、企业的规模小而淘汰率高、企业的创新能力低而模仿能力高、企业的初创阶段发展速度快。本文认为,东亚金融危机与东亚经济增长模式不存在内在的必然联系。     

美国金融危机对东亚新兴经济体的贸易传染渠道分析

美国金融危机到底以何种方式在全球传播，以至于演变成全球经济海啸，一直是近几年学术界所关注的问题之一。本文以美国金融危机对外传播的贸易传染渠道为切人点，分析了美国金融危机通过贸易伙伴型传染和贸易竞争对手型传染这两个贸易传染子渠道对东亚新兴经济体的溢出程度。对面板数据进行的GLS实证结果显示，美国金融危机通过贸易传染渠道的溢出，与大部分东亚新兴经济体经济波动之间存在10％以上显著性水平的相关性，因而贸易传染渠道是美国金融危机对东亚溢出的一个重要机制。     

Invisible Linkages: A Regional Perspective of East Asian Political Economy

This article studies East Asian political economy from a regional perspective. The Asian financial crisis showed that East Asian economies are highly regionalized. However, the linkages among Asian economies, mostly informal in nature, often appear "invisible" to many in the West, who focus more on the states and formal institutions. Drawing on a broad set of literature mostly in Asian languages, this paper provides a systematic study of informal integration in East Asia, which consists of not only regional production networks, but also ethnic Chinese business networks and subregional economic zones. It finds that the three informal mechanisms have formed an interrelated pattern of regional integration in East Asia. The nature of the economic networks is very useful in explaining the Asian crisis and the different performances of East Asian economies in the crisis. The crisis has also resulted in profound changes in informal integration. While the Japanese–led production networks have been greatly weakened, the Chinese Economic Area is rising, driven by the ethnic Chinese business networks and subregional economic zones. As a result, the Japan–dominated "flying geese pattern" has been broken. The connections between Greater China and the United States have also been enhanced and are out–competing the Japanese production networks. Many of the new developments have been ignored in the West but they are key factors that will shape the future of Asian and World political economy.     

新兴市场经济体汇率制度的选择与实践：以越南为例

在实行管理浮动汇率制度的东亚新兴市场经济体中，越南的钉住美元的倾向最为明显。本文在回顾越南钉住汇率制实践的基础上，系统地分析了钉住美元制度的货币政策考量及汇率稳定机制。最后分析了越南钉住汇率制度在实践中面临的困境及可能的改革方向。     

Whither East Asian economic integration? Korea��s regionalization cum globalization strategy

The recent regionalization in East Asia can be defined in terms of regionalization cum globalization. In the case of Europe, regionalization was originally intended to create a preferential and protected area. From its inception, however, regionalization in East Asia emphasized open membership and global liberalization. This so-called open regionalism was then adopted as a fundamental principle of the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC). Given that APEC is an inter-regional institution, however, the concept of open regionalism is not applicable to characterize exclusively Asian integration process that gained momentum on the basis of the ASEAN + 3 framework. For many East Asian countries, a regionalization initiative, especially after the 1997 financial crisis, was a natural response to cope with globalization. Indeed, although East Asian economies are increasingly regionalized, the global market remains crucial and exclusively Asian arrangements are still rare. Globalization and regionalization processes are mutually reinforcing. Singapore is one example that developed into a regional economic hub through the regionalization cum globalization strategy. Given that Korea concluded recently two important free trade areas with the USA and the EU, Korea is also capable of building such a regional economic hub. The first step is to strengthen a cooperation network between the three Northeast Asian countries, China, Japan, and Korea. This network, together with ASEAN, is expected to catalyze the regional integration in East Asia and shape its future evolution.     

Regional and multi-level governance: East Asian leadership after the global financial crisis

Although the economies of East Asia emerged from the global financial crisis of 2008 in comparatively strong positions, they remain structurally embedded within global markets. The degree of regional integration that has occurred within East Asia is thus predicated on the on-going interdependence with the economies of Europe and North America. Moves to advance East Asian regional cooperation in the wake of the crisis reflect this global interdependence, as well as intra-regional differences in interests and a lack of strong leadership within the region. Modest cooperation on an East Asian basis has continued since 2008 but the region is very far from realising a substantive regional governance model on economic and financial issues and does not appear to be pursuing a distinctive governance agenda. This article examines recent developments in East Asian regional cooperation, with a view to assessing the significance of current achievements and explaining the mixed and sometimes contradictory nature of initiatives for regional governance in East Asia.     

中韩经贸合作与东亚自由贸易区构建

东亚地区作为21世纪区域发展战略的制高点和经济最具活力的地区,越来越得到世界各国或地区的关注。以中韩两国之间的经济贸易合作推动未来建立一个东亚自由贸易区,是东亚地区各国或地区的一种应对未来挑战的积极探索。新的区域战略支点与运作需要建立和完善有利于区域经济贸易合作的集散功能、配置功能、服务功能和创新功能。有效运用中韩两国政府和市场的双重力量,以“互利双赢”的利益关系为导向,多渠道、多层次、多方式地协调、推进区域内经济合作。