共查询到19条相似文献,搜索用时 234 毫秒
1.
一段时间以来,因银行ATM自动取款机故障而发生的许霆盗窃金融机构一案,在社会上引发了极大的争议和讨论,该案一审判决许霆构成盗窃金融机构罪,判处无期徒刑,在许霆上诉后该案被发回重审,目前尚在审理之中。很明显,无期徒刑的刑罚,相对于许霆所实施行为本身的性质和前因后果来说,肯定是过重了,有失公允,即便合乎法律的规定,也与情理相背。 相似文献
2.
2007年末.我所在的公诉二处承办了这样一个案件:原广东省法院保安人员许霆使用其银行借记卡在柜员机上取款时.发现柜员机出现故障,其在明知自己的银行账户只有170余元的情况下.取走了17万余元。我院以盗窃罪对许霆提起公诉.广州市中级人民法院一审判处许霆无期徒刑.这一判决引起了民众的普遍关注。许霆上诉后,广东省高院将该案发回重审。 相似文献
3.
3月31日,备受社会关注的许霆ATM机取款盗窃案重审后在广州公开宣判,广州市中级法院仍认定被告人许霆犯盗窃罪,但将原审判决的无期徒刑改为判处有期徒刑5年,井处罚金2万元。 相似文献
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
2006年4月21日,打工仔许霆用工资卡在ATM机取款时,意外发现ATM机出现故障,取1000元卡里才扣1元!狂喜之下,他连续刷卡,获取现金17.5万元。潜逃一年被抓获的许霆,被广州市中院以盗窃罪判处无期徒刑。许霆案一审判无期的消息引起各界热议,有罪?无罪?应轻判?应重判?……各方观点碰撞,成为读者关注焦点,甚至有法学专家就此召开研讨会。据悉,广东省高院在2008年1月9日撤销了广州市中院的一审判决,我们在等待此案的最新消息。 相似文献
9.
笔者对许霆案判决提出以下几点商榷意见:一是许霆的行为是否是犯罪行为;二是如果许霆的行为是犯罪行为应该定为何种犯罪行为;三是自动取款机是否可以代表银行的意志:四是银行方面是否存在过错?如果存在过错该怎样追究其法律责任,另外,笔者认为许霆的行为应定性为侵占罪。 相似文献
10.
在银行ATM机“多取款行为”的法律定性 从合同法和电子商务法视角对“许霆案”的辨析 总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1
《法律适用》2008,(9)
2007年11月,广州中院审理判决了"许霆在ATM机(即柜员机)多取款"案,由于许霆被认定盗窃金融机构,一审判处无期徒刑。案件公开后,引发了网民、法学专家、律师、社会公众等的大讨论,有认为根本不构成犯罪, 相似文献
11.
目前关于想象竞合犯的三大处断原则均存在不足。对此,必须以全面评价原则与禁止重复评价原则为指导,以行为无价值、结果无价值、主观罪过三要素为核心,构建新的想象竞合犯处断规则,即想象竞合犯的处刑应当是数罪中最重之宣告刑加上余罪之宣告刑的2/3。该处断规则必须在《刑法》第69条之下运行,即遵守限制加重原则,且如果数罪中有死刑或无期徒刑的,采取吸收原则,执行死刑或无期徒刑;如果数罪中有判处有期徒刑和拘役的,同样采吸收原则,执行有期徒刑;数罪中有判处有期徒刑和管制,或者拘役和管制的,采逐次执行原则,有期徒刑、拘役执行完毕后,管制仍须执行。 相似文献
12.
许霆案判决之误的原因,该案的民/刑违法属性差异,采取证伪与证成并举的方法,论证该案作为"刑事犯罪案"的不成立和作为"民事侵权案"的成立。许霆案引致的"刑事犯罪与民事侵权的关系"、"刑事理论与刑事实践的关系"、"刑事实践与刑事政策的关系"等问题,为我们提供了如何会通法治的若干启示。 相似文献
13.
“许霆案”与中国法律的形式主义困境——兼论波斯纳的法律活动理论 总被引:1,自引:0,他引:1
通过许霆案的法学观察,展示学者何以为学者以及学者关注实践的学理方式;并结合许霆案这样一个特殊案例的分析,试图揭示出支配中国法律的形式主义法律观,为救济这种形式主义法律观可能存在的理论困境和实践难题,提出实用主义法律观尤其是波斯纳的法律活动理论可能具有更强的现实解释力和理论正当性。 相似文献
14.
Celesta A. Albonetti 《Journal of Quantitative Criminology》1998,14(4):353-378
Previous research on the punishment of offenders convicted of a white-collar offense estimated models that specify only direct effects of defendant characteristics, offense-related variables, and guilty pleas on sentence severity. Drawing from conflict or labeling theories, much of this research focused on the effects of offender's socioeconomic status on sentence outcomes. Findings from this research are inconsistent about the relationship between defendant characteristics and sentence severity. These studies overlook how differences in case complexity of white-collar offense and guilty pleas may intervene in the relationship between offender characteristics and sentence outcomes. This study seeks to contribute to an understanding of federal sentencing prior to the federal sentencing guidelines by testing a legal-bureaucratic theory of sentencing that hypothesizes an interplay between case complexity, guilty pleas and length of imprisonment. This interplay reflects the interface between the legal ramifications of pleading guilty, prosecutorial interests in efficiency and finality of case disposition in complex white-collar cases, and sentence severity. Using structural equation modeling, a four-equation model of sentencing that specifies case complexity and guilty pleas as intervening variables in the relationship between offender characteristics and length of imprisonment is estimated. Several findings are noteworthy. First, the hypothesized interplay between case complexity, guilty pleas, and sentence severity is supported. Second, the effect of offender's educational attainment on sentence severity is indirect via case complexity and guilty pleas. Third, offender's race and gender effect length of imprisonment both directly and indirectly through the intervening effect of case complexity and guilty pleas. These findings indicate the need to specify sentencing models that consider the direct and indirect effects of offender characteristics, offense characteristics, and guilty pleas on judicial discretion at sentencing. 相似文献
15.
van Zyl Smit D 《International journal of law and psychiatry》2006,29(5):405-421
This article notes that, because understandings of what life imprisonment means are often ambiguous, the life sentence is sometimes perceived to be relatively uncontroversial. Life imprisonment without the prospect of parole for children under the age of 18 years is the most extreme form of this sentence that can be imposed. However, in the United States of America even such sentences have only recently become the subject of public debate. In contrast, in a small but growing number of jurisdictions all life sentences are regarded as constitutionally suspect and contrary to human rights, whilst in the majority of jurisdictions the imposition of life imprisonment is strictly limited. The article traces recent developments in the imposition and implementation of life imprisonment that have evoked some controversy. It pays particular attention to attempts that have been made in practice to ensure that life imprisonment produces punishment that is proportionate to the crime. It points out, however, that a renewed focus on combating dangerous offenders through indeterminate preventive sentences has blunted even this modest safeguard. It warns that this tendency increases the risk of life imprisonment being an unfairly harsh penalty. 相似文献
16.
媒体对定罪量刑活动所带来的负面影响,主要是以舆论为中介,其作用机制表现为:媒体传播引发舆论,舆论会带来民愤与民怜两方面效果,民愤与民怜成为影响定罪量刑的两大因素。媒体对定罪量刑活动所带来的负面影响程度受刑事立法、媒体和司法制度等方面因素影响。 相似文献
17.
在司法实践中,“道德法律化”判决结果混淆了道德与法律的本质区别,其在逻辑前提、价值定位上尚需探讨。本文以许霆案为素材,从其价值层面分析“道德法律化”中隐含的道德标准绝对化、一元化和道德约束强权化的倾向,阐明其对社会道德生活存在的潜在威胁及其对“合法、独立、平等”的司法原则之核心价值的影响。 相似文献
18.
19.
A Welsh appeal court has reduced the sentence handed down to an offender because of his HIV status, despite his lengthy criminal record. The court reduced the sentence from five to three-and-a-half years' imprisonment. 相似文献