侵占罪的认定及其与盗窃罪之辨析

侵占罪和盗窃罪是财产犯罪中常见的两种犯罪行为,由于两罪在概念、侵犯的对象及客体、实施的手段和行为方式上都有类似之处,两罪在实践中表现形式又都纷繁复杂,易于混淆。二者的区别在于:非法占有他人财产故意的认识内容不同;犯罪的客观行为表现不同;侵犯的客体不完全相同;适用诉讼程序不同。     

The Need for Effective Dialogue

In common with some other work on the topic of theft of electronic products, the approach of project MARC is to lay considerable responsibility for these crimes at the door of the electronics manufacturers. This seems misplaced and appears to stem from an insufficient appreciation of the nature and drivers of the global consumer electronics market and an ineffective dialogue with the manufacturers. Many options for additional security are possible, but the global nature of the market, the ever-diminishing product lifetimes of electronic products and consumer reluctance to ascribe a high value to such features complicates their introduction. Thought should be given to the establishment of a new quasi-official body to bring together the stakeholders to create a constructive dialogue between interested parties.     

对盗窃数额在认定方面的一点思考

盗窃罪在我国属于常见多发的财产型犯罪。盗窃数额对盗窃罪的定罪与量刑具有关键的作用,立法上规定了“数额较大或者多次盗窃”,“数额巨大或者有其他严重情节”、“数额特别巨大或者有特别严重情节”及“有下列情形之一”几种情形作为定罪及量刑情节。因此正确的认定盗窃数额在司法实践中具有重要的意义。本文从一个小的方面来谈一下对盗窃数额的认定。     

融媒体时代网播组织的法律保护困境与应然路径选择——兼评新《著作权法》第47条

在当今媒体融合时代,网播组织已成为文化产品的主要提供者。现实中网播组织主要有两种类型:传统广播组织的互联网衍生平台和独立网播平台。互联网衍生平台依托于传统广播电台、电视台,具有天然的内容资源优势,而独立网播平台播放的节目通常依据其与第三方签订的合同而定。由于网播组织目前在我国版权法上的地位模糊不清,实践中网播组织遭遇信号盗播时或以传统媒体的被许可人身份起诉,或以独立的著作权人身份起诉,但在司法实践中均遭遇维权困境。为顺应技术发展趋势,保护并促进网络产业发展,我国《著作权法》应将网播组织纳入广播组织权的主体保护范围。     

构建整体打击和防控"两抢一盗"犯罪长效机制的思考

近三年来,上海市的"两抢一盗"犯罪立案数值呈持续走高趋势.各级公安机关应当在2005年全国范围开展的打击"两抢一盗"犯罪专项斗争的基础上,牢固树立持久作战、常年打防的意识,确立专项斗争常态化、情报支撑信息化、警务协作一体化、防控手段多样化、社会防控互动化的"五化"思路,落实情报主导、刑嫌调控、协同严打、综合运作为主要内容的"四个三"工作措施,构建打击和防控"两抢一盗"犯罪的长效机制,尽快有效遏制住此类案件的高发势头.     

From the economy of deficit to the black-market: car theft and trafficking in Bulgaria

Official and victimisation data show that despite falling rates for motor vehicle thefts, much of the EU ‘organized crime’ related thefts have remained almost stable. Nevertheless, the car-theft market in the EU has changed, and so has the role of traditional destinations for stolen vehicles, such as Eastern Europe. The paper examines the demand, supply, and regulation factors that shape the structures of the vehicle theft market in Bulgaria, and smuggling patterns and offender behaviour in source countries, in particular Spain. We argue that such nuanced historical approach that takes into account a wider range of factors in destination countries can help explain the recent transformations in Europe’s vehicle-theft markets.

论盗骗交织犯罪的区分

根据欺骗是为窃取创造条件还是诱导交付,何者对财产转移起决定性作用,可以对盗骗交织犯罪作第一层过滤。再根据被害人控制意识与控制可能性的有无,又可将交付型盗骗交织犯罪分为纯正交付型和不纯正交付型。在纯正交付型盗骗交织犯罪中,起决定作用的是欺诈隐瞒行为,被害人理应辨明真伪但陷于圈套,交付归根结底是缘于欺诈而作出,未脱离骗取的本质,采用"处分意识不要说"以诈骗罪论具有合理性。个别情况下还需考察被害人对于事实之真伪是否具有实质性审核判断义务,若有实质性审核判断义务但因没有认识或者预见到而交付当属受骗,不构成被利用的工具;不具备此义务而作出的交付则属于被利用的工具。"偷换二维码案"中的处分人只是依照交易习惯或者惯例而行动,没有实质性审核义务,事实上与机器无异,因而属于被利用的无意识的工具。"收购水稻案"与"收购废铝案"的被害人本身有处分全部财产的意思,行为人通过做手脚的方式使其对财物的数量和价值发生错误认识从而少支付价款,属于欺骗他人免除债务型诈骗。盗骗交织犯罪只有一个行为对财物转移占有起决定性作用,当属一罪,按照想象竞合处理会不当加重行为人的责任。     

论盗窃特殊对象的认定和处理

金融票证本身没有价值 ,盗窃金融票证行为不构成犯罪。不明知是枪支、弹药而盗窃但事后藏匿的 ,应以盗窃罪和私藏枪支、弹药罪数罪并罚。明知是假币而盗窃嗣后继续持有的 ,不构成盗窃罪 ,而构成非法持有假币罪。     

Vehicle remote keyless entry systems and engine immobilisers: Do not believe the insurer that this technology is perfect

In the 1990s, governments put pressure on motor vehicle manufacturers to provide better security for vehicles. Thieves could steal cars and lorries with relative ease. The manufacturers responded by introducing electronic systems to make it more difficult for vehicles to be stolen without the key. However, as with most forms of technology, the software can be bypassed. In recent years, thieves have manipulated weaknesses in the technology, so that vehicles can be stolen without the key.     

对盗窃自行车、助动车犯罪及其防控的经济分析

从“经济人”的理论来分析“两车”盗窃行为,可以看出,盗窃“两车”的低成本和对“两车”极大的需求是导致“两窃”泛滥的原因。提高“两窃”成本、减少“两车”需求是控制“两车”盗窃的有效对策。