我国家族企业内部纠纷的起因与规范——以家族企业内部的产权关系为视角

随着家族企业对社会经济发展作用的日益增强,我国家族企业内部纠纷已经不再是婚姻、家庭内部的事情,它关涉企业的发展与壮大甚至存活.本文认为,家庭财产与企业资产的混同,家庭生活与企业生产的重叠,个人投资与家庭投入的模糊,体力付出与脑力贡献的混淆等是家族企业内部纠纷产生的根源.因此,资产归属的事先明确是避免家族企业内部纠纷的关键.     

违反合同附随义务的解决路径

我国《合同法》借用合同概念对不同阶段的附随义务分别作出规定,并分别针对不同阶段的附随义务,各自适用独立的请求权基础、归责原则和法律责任.《德国民法典》用债的概念对附随义务进行法定化,实现了各阶段附随义务请求权基础、归责原则的统一.这值得我国立法借鉴.     

“坐牢补偿费”的法律定性及司法规制

给予和收受"坐牢补偿费"是对法律秩序和司法制度的挑战和冲击。它削弱了刑罚威慑力和司法公信力;作为一种新的腐败动向,它降低贪官腐败成本,影响整个惩贪治腐进程;它助长了"行业潜规则"肆意横行,严重败坏社会风气,混淆了正义标准。基于目前学术界和实务界对"坐牢补偿费"的期权腐败、继续犯罪、补偿赠与等法律定性问题,建立结构合理、制约有效的权力运行机制和事前反腐机制,加强对行贿人的打击力度及惩治力度,完善行贿罪的立法势在必行。     

论量刑程序中的法官自由裁量权

量刑阶段法官自由裁量权是直接影响被告人人身、自由权利状态的一项司法权力。由于法律的概括性、模糊性、滞后性等原因,导致了法官自由裁量权范围过宽,幅度过大。同时立法水平的限制,现行法律缺乏一个统一、详尽、具体的量刑标准,从而有可能破坏司法公正。然而自由裁量权在审判过程中是无可避免的,因此只有从加强司法解释,确立统一量刑规则,定罪和量刑程序分离,建立检察官量刑建议权等方面予以适当规定,才能更好的发挥其积极作用,为实现量刑公正提供保障。     

古文点校智力成果可版权性的证伪与保护路径简

古文点校的本质在于最大程度复原古文原意,因此必然受到上下文内容、时代背景、历史事实、古文语法等诸多限制,点校青在事实上无法做到任意取舍,在表达结果上必然是趋同的 . 而只存在有限表达方式的智力成果不能构成作品,对于此类智力成果的保护,可以寻求邻接权的保护.     

Keeping the rascals in: Anti‐political‐establishment parties and their cost of governing in established democracies

Coalition governments in established democracies incur, on average, an electoral ‘cost of governing’. This cost varies across coalition partners, and is higher for anti‐political‐establishment parties. This is because, if such a party participates in a coalition, it loses the purity of its message by being seen to cooperate with the political establishment. In order to demonstrate that anti‐political‐establishment parties suffer an additional cost of governing, this article builds on the work by Van der Brug et al. and refines the standard cost of governing theory by ‘bringing the party back in’. The results of the analyses, based on 594 observations concerning 51 parties in seven Western European countries, cast doubt on the conventional concept of a cost of governing that pertains to all parties equally. The findings call for a major revision of the standard cost of governing literature, while adding a significant contribution to the debate on strategies against parties that may constitute a danger to democracy.     

试论国家对健康权与药品知识产权保护制度的平衡简

健康权在任何与健康熙护议题有关的政策上（包括药品知识产权制度）都不可忽略.然而, 《多哈宣言与2003年决议仍未触及药品知识产权保障与健康权冲突的核心问题,这就需要将健康权作为一项政策工具对药品知识产权的影响做补充性的解释.国家保障药物获得权利的义务应根据其实质内涵的多样性与复杂性掺入防卫权的特色；换言之,药品获得权应区分为国家仅有义务渐进实现的受益权与国家有义务立即实现的受益权.这种通过细化国家保障药品获得权的义务,在具有相同重要性的健康权及药品知识产权产生冲突时,便有足够的基础从权利本质审视两者在冲突时的平衡关系是否适当.     

论西方国家公民对政府的监督与制约

主权在民是西方国家宪法的一项重要原则,其实质是公民对政治过程的参与和监督,由此构成了西方民主制度的实质与核心。从静态的结构来讲,公民监督权是体现主权在民的一系列制度;从动态的过程来看,公民监督是一系列的政治参与活动。公民监督构成了西方国家监督体系的基础,是监督体系有效运转的动力源泉,在国家政治生活中发挥着不可替代的重要作用。     

Gender,populist attitudes,and voting: explaining the gender gap in voting for populist radical right and populist radical left parties

Empirical studies have demonstrated that compared to almost all other parties, populist radical right (PRR) parties draw more votes from men than from women. However, the two dominant explanations that are generally advanced to explain this disparity – gender differences regarding socio-economic position and lower perceptions regarding the threat of immigrants – cannot fully explain the difference. The article contends that it might actually be gender differences regarding the conceptualisation of society and politics – populist attitudes – that explain the gender gap. Thus, the gap may be due, in part, to differences in socialisation. The article analyses EES 2014 data on voting for the populist radical right and the populist radical left in nine European countries. Across countries, the gender gap in voting for the PRR is indeed partly explained by populist attitudes. For populist radical left parties, the results are less clear, suggesting that populism has different meanings to voters on the left and on the right.     

“速度与激情”事件引发的民法思考

四川绵阳“速度与激情”事件多方位反映出民法的问题。公民的隐私权、肖像权等人格权应当得到法律保护；公权力机关在对公共场所进行合法监控时必须保护好被监督公众的隐私权等人格权；公权力机构对依法获得的公民信息因过错而公开的侵权责任。这些反映出的民法问题都应该进行深入思考研究。