法理天空 用精取宏——评《法理学:法律哲学与法律方法》

《法理学:法律哲学与法律方法》一书运用整体论的方法,描述了西方从古希腊到二十世纪七十年代的各种法哲学流派的思想、理论和主义,论证了法律是秩序与正义的综合体,探讨了解决法律问题的方法论,从而完整地构建了综合法理学体系。     

公共管理者的角色与知能探究

公共管理者的效能直接影响着社会经济的发展与国力兴衰。公共管理体制的规范在很大程度上影响着公共管理者的实际表现,它对公共管理者进行角色定位,并提出知能要求。对公共管理者来说,从政治、法律与道德责任及知识技能的维度上理解这些要求非常有意义。     

试论女性领导的自我修养

加强自身修养,是女性领导提高素质的重要途径。面对时代和形势的发展要求,女性领导要用正确的观点认识自我,用人类社会丰富的知识充实自我,用坚强的党性战胜自我,用与时俱进的精神超越自我。     

国际经济法理论的多元视角

当代国际经济法应该具有多元开放的法学视角和理论进路,例如,法律视角、经济视角、政治视角、历史视角、人权视角、哲学视角、发展视角、可持续发展视角,等等。Jackson的实用主义宪法制度分析、Petersmann的理想主义自由宪政分析、Qureshi的全球化多元综合法律分析为国际经济法学术领域的三种主要视角。国际经济法的理论多元标志着国际经济法学术开始走出理论的幼稚和贫困,迈向理论的成熟和繁荣,进而超越概念之争,进入理论之争,乃至开启范式之争。     

浅论“传染病防治失职罪”

从中国广东省出现第一例非典型性肺炎的感染病例至今,我们付出的代价是巨大的。血与泪的教训迫使我们回过头去,重新审视过去。我国的政治、经济、法律中存在的弊端也暴露了出来。非典事件中暴露出来的刑法关于“传染病防治失职罪”规定有一定的弊端,从犯罪构成要件客观方面以及对该法条规定的犯罪主体的范围加以分析,希望刑法能够随着国家和社会情况的变化而改善,从而为中国的传染病防治工作提供更坚实的法律依据。     

Multi-resolution image fusion technique and its application to forensic science

Image fusion is a process of combining two or more images into an image. It can extract features from source images, and provide more information than one image can. Multi-resolution analysis plays an important role in image processing, it provides a technique to decompose an image and extract information from coarse to fine scales. In some practical forensic examinations (such as the cartridge image check), we cannot obtain all information from just one image; on the contrary, we need information from images with difference light sources (or light ways). In this paper, we apply an image fusion method based on multi-resolution analysis to forensic science. Synthetic and real images (such as images from closed-up photography and flash photography) are used to show the capability of the multi-resolution image fusion technique.     

The Trap

A professor is brought before a secret tribunalin his law faculty for the purpose of decidingthe appropriateness of a student's grade. Thegrounds of the grade appeal are that theprofessor had taught critically instead ofpractically and that he had done so with anacademic bias and prejudice. He is also allegedto have taught philosophy rather than law. After many hours of examination andcross-examination as a defendant and as anexpert witness, the professor, Flink, begins adialogue with a spirit in an effort tounderstand the nature and identity of law. Flink comes to appreciate that law is adisplacing discourse rather than a structure ofcategories signified in an official writing. The analytic method familiar to officials incommon law jurisdictions, Flink comes tounderstand, excludes the experiential meaningsthat are manifested through unwritten gesturesand rituals. Officials embody signs withexperiential expectations and past assumptions.The embodiment of meaning brings life intolegal language. But such an embodiment isforgotten as officials decompose textualfragments and reported social events intoanalytic units. Legal analysis is so successfulthat officials even forget that they hadforgotten something so important as theembodiment of meaning.The professor and the spirit also ask whetherjustice is an `ought' and where one can locatesuch an `ought'. They conclude that there is astructure within which legal officials reason.The exteriority of the structure is anunwritten `ought' realm. But the structurepossesses a gap, which enters into such anunanalysable object-less realm. Analyticreasoning has assumed that reason can take anofficial only so far until she or he mustjourney outside the structure to anunanalysable realm of personal values. However, the embodiment of meanings alsoincorporates unwritten collective values ofwhich officials, precisely because of thesuccess of the analysis project in forgettingthat something was forgotten, have never beenconscious. It is such an unanalysable realmthat grounds or authorises the analyticproject. The exterior authorising origin of theanalytic units of the structure rests upon apossibility that requires faith on the part ofthe officials, a faith that there exists afoundation, radically different from theanalytic units, on the other side of thestructure. The officials can, at best, imagineor picture the authorising origin, located asit is in the unanalysable object-less realmexterior to the written language of thestructure. The imagined origin takes the `form'of a bodiless spirit. The officials (and theprofessor and spirit) are haunted by thepossibility that the structure of humanlyposited rules are ultimately authorised by aspirit.     

合同解释制度的法理分析

现代合同法解释出现了一些新特点。合同解释的目的不是纯粹的认识和描写,而是重在其规范的机能,即决定判决的基准。在合同解释实践中,法官是在运用而并非是援用解释规则。合同解释规则是在长期审判实践中形成的,但这些规则上升为法律规范,并形成合同解释法律制度是与解释学及法学理论的发展紧密相关的。     

试论中国帝王文学

中国帝王文学是一种独立于中国文学主流但又起着特殊作用的文学类群 ,应当从文学自身本质规律出发来进行解析。作为一种文学类群 ,它是一种十分独特而又悠久的客观存在。这种畸形的阳刚文学的产生是中国特有的现象。它有着突出的特征 :政治化极强的文学内容 ,唯我独尊的个体精神心理 ,主体表现的阳刚雄壮 ,符合艺术本质的自我表现等     

对我国法制发展战略的反思--以西方法律传统的形成为背景

无论东方西方,现代社会有其共性,所以应该充分重视西方法治化过程中形成的普遍性制度和有效经验;中国的法治建设有其特性,因此外国的经验不能代替中国自己的实践。