对加强"三基"建设的探索与思考

“三基”①建设是一项牵涉到公安工作根基的综合性系统工程,需要各级组织和全体民警积极投入。结合厦门铁路公安处新建处的特点,提出了围绕“当好领导、精简机关、夯实基层”的全新“三基”工作思路。     

窘境与突围：选择性罪名的命运

我国刑法分则体系经司法解释之后涌现出大量的选择性罪名，此举虽属无奈，但毕竟给司法实践带来了诸多不便。为此，有必要剖析其生成的原因或被选择的理由，以及其在客观上存在着哪些价值与不足，并寻找解决问题的办法。在尽可能减少产生选择性罪名的情况下，对那些不得不使用的选择性罪名，也要进行论证和提出必要的防范措施，从而终结不加限制地使用该罪名的法律历史，让刑法理性的光芒伴随着选择性罪名走完它的过渡时期。     

关于我国民事再审程序指导思想之反思

“实事求是、有错必纠”是我国民事再审程序的指导思想。但是实践中一直不能解决的“申诉难”、“再审滥”等问题的存在却一再对该原则提出质疑。原因是通常所谓的“实事求是、有错必纠”原则在民事司法中缺乏现实基础和具体操作性;进一步,真正的“实事求是”要求尊重民事诉讼的独特规律,对生效裁判错误区别对待,而不是机械地“有错必纠”。总之,民事再审制度之改革与完善,要求我们必须对这一原则进行重新认识和创新     

我国民事简易程序的反思与发展进路

我国法院目前适用简易程序审理的案件,实际上已经包含了国外第一审程序所有的三种类型案件,即普通程序、简易程序和小额诉讼程序。三种诉讼标的数额差别很大的案件适用同一种程序,与国际上公认的按照案件的类型设置民事纷争的处理程序的原理发生了明显的冲突。笔者认为,此次《民事诉讼法》修改,首先应将目前按照简易程序审理的案件按照一定的数额标准一分为三;其次,在基层法院要专门设立简易诉讼法庭、小额诉讼法庭,以防止不同类型案件审理上的混同;最后,简易、小额诉讼程序的设置要有助于人们接近司法,有助于法治社会的形成。     

The changes of fourier transform infrared spectrum in rat brain

Estimation of the time since death (postmortem interval [PMI]) is one of the most difficult problems in forensic investigations, and many methods currently are utilized to estimate the PMI. The goal of this study was to investigate the changes of attenuated total reflection-Fourier transform infrared (ATR-FTIR) spectra of rat brain from postmortem time 0-144 h. The intensity ratios of major absorbance bands were examined (I(1066)/I(1392), I(1168)/I(1392), I(1234)/I(1454), I(1301)/I(1392), I(1647)/I(2956), I(2921)/I(2850), and I(1647)/I(1539)). The spectra of rat brain displayed prominent changes with increasing PMI. The band at 2871 and 1737 per cm became weak with the time increasing and even disappeared at postmortem 96 and 72 h, respectively. A close linear correlation was shown between the relative absorption intensity and the PMI, and the I(1234) /I(1454) offered a stronger correlation (r = 0.973). Our results indicate that ATR-FTIR spectroscopy may be a useful technique for estimating the PMI.     

Reflective political reasoning: Political disagreement and empathy

As political polarization increases across many of the world's established democracies, many citizens are unwilling to appreciate and consider the viewpoints of those who disagree with them. Previous research shows that this lack of reflection can undermine democratic accountability. The purpose of this paper is to study whether empathy for the other can motivate people to reason reflectively about politics. Extant studies have largely studied trait-level differences in the ability and inclination of individuals to engage in reflection. Most of these studies focus on observational moderators, which makes it difficult to make strong claims about the effects of being in a reflective state on political decision making. We extend this research by using a survey experiment with a large and heterogeneous sample of UK citizens (N = 2014) to investigate whether a simple empathy intervention can induce people to consider opposing viewpoints and incorporate those views in their opinion about a pressing political issue. We find that actively imagining the feelings and thoughts of someone one disagrees with prompts more reflection in the way that people reason about political issues as well as elicits empathic feelings of concern towards those with opposing viewpoints. We further examine whether empathy facilitates openness to attitude change in the counter-attitudinal direction and find that exposure to an opposing perspective (without its empathy component) per se is enough to prompt attitude change. Our study paints a more nuanced picture of the relationship between empathy, reflection and policy attitudes.     

繁荣与困惑——单位犯罪研究30年的回顾与反思

我国单位犯罪刑事立法的政策和功利性,决定了相关理论研究的现实性。但理论研究固有的价值和使命决定了它可以超越实践。建立在不同基础之上的理论研究的功能价值应该有所区别。从我国的刑法基础和单位犯罪的立法演进看,自然人犯罪是追究单位刑事责任的基础,以此为基点的理论研究立足现实,对实践具有较强的指导意义。     

全球背景下中国纠纷解决机制之重构

全球化对中国纠纷解决提出了特殊要求,主要体现为回应型的纠纷解决机理及纠纷解决模式的趋同,在此背景下,应对中国的纠纷解决机制进行反思,并重构当代中国的纠纷解决机制。     

关于在高等学校实施开展导生制的几点思考

“导生制”作为一种重引导轻管理的教学模式,对解决大学生适应大学生活问题,有积极推动作用。高等学校学生教育管理工作大多实行班主任制和辅导员制,重学生的共性培养,轻学生的个性发展。在高校中推行“导生制”将是以上两种教育管理模式的有益补充。     

中国法治秩序建构理论的反思与重构--以日常生活批判理论为视角

本文运用日常生活批判理论对当代中国法治秩序建构理论进行了反思,认为当前法治秩序建构理论的致命弱点在于主体维度的缺失;法治秩序建构的本质在于由传统的日常生活世界向非日常生活世界跃迁;当代日常生活作为传统法律文化的寓所对于法治秩序的建构形成巨大的阻滞与消解因素;日常生活批判对于法治秩序的建构具有根基性价值.进而提出重构当代法治秩序建构理论的设想,即建构一套以国家(政府)为动力,以社会为基础,以日常生活批判和深层文化启蒙为主体维度的国家·社会·日常生活批判三位一体的新的法治秩序建构理论.